In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John Hay writes:
: Does anyone else also have problems with pxeboot on -current? I just
: rebuilt a system and the pxeboot just garbles the screen when it starts.
: I have a pxeboot built on May 5 that do work.
June 11th -current works for me.
Warnr
To Unsubscribe
Does anyone else also have problems with pxeboot on -current? I just
rebuilt a system and the pxeboot just garbles the screen when it starts.
I have a pxeboot built on May 5 that do work.
John
--
John Hay -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe free
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 22:53:25 +0100, Adrian Browne wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks I'm having a prob with tcsh.cat when performing a a make install
> > after a buildworld and can't seem to shrug it off and or find a reason to
> > it's occurance does any
FWIW- your patches appear to work fine for top of tree alpha.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 22:53:25 +0100, Adrian Browne wrote:
>
> Hi folks I'm having a prob with tcsh.cat when performing a a make install
> after a buildworld and can't seem to shrug it off and or find a reason to
> it's occurance does any one know of a fix as I cant go any further :(
It seems
Hi folks I'm having a prob with tcsh.cat when performing a a make install
after a buildworld and can't seem to shrug it off and or find a reason to
it's occurance does any one know of a fix as I cant go any further :(
/bin/tcsh -> /bin/csh
install -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 csh.1.gz /usr/share
I've also seen this while making ports. If I ^C while fetch is trying to
connect to the distfile site, it doesn't die. It might be that the mk.*
stuff is spinning off shells and allowing them to become disconnected from
terminal input somehow.
> -Original Message-
> From: Szilveszter Ad
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Szilveszter Adam wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 12:38:43PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> >
> > Heh- is this a bug or a feature?
> >
> > Making a kernel, no -j args, -current, tot
>
> tot... what?:-) Hello? Are you still there?:-)
"Top of Tree"
>
> > oot/kernel make
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 12:38:43PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> Heh- is this a bug or a feature?
>
> Making a kernel, no -j args, -current, tot
tot... what?:-) Hello? Are you still there?:-)
> oot/kernel make all
> ===> 3dfx
> ^C<^C'd
Oh, this is make
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 12:38:43PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> >
> > Heh- is this a bug or a feature?
> >
> > Making a kernel, no -j args, -current, tot
> >
> > oot/kernel make all
> > ===> 3dfx
> > ^C <<
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 12:38:43PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> Heh- is this a bug or a feature?
>
> Making a kernel, no -j args, -current, tot
>
> oot/kernel make all
> ===> 3dfx
> ^C<^C'd it
>
> nellie.feral.com > ===> accf_data
Heh- is this a bug or a feature?
Making a kernel, no -j args, -current, tot
oot/kernel make all
===> 3dfx
^C <^C'd it
nellie.feral.com > ===> accf_data
root mak===> accf_http
e
nellie.feral.com > ===> agp
===> aha
fg===> amr
bash: f
To cancel your subscription please click on the link :
http://64.23.86.178/rejectmail.html
XXX FREE-ASIAN DAYLY PICTURE ARCHIVE!
Japanese 10 pics updated daily! Point your browser at:
http://www.free-asia.com/free/okazu/
JAPANESE SCHOOL GIRL'S GOLDEN ARCHIVES!
Our favorite now with o
Thus spake Michael Harnois ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Building the kernel without INET6 makes this error go away. cvsup as
> of about two hours ago.
Is it fixed now?
Ume has committed a fix to the mbuf locks recently.
Alex
(I just got the same panic with a different traceback with a kernel
from bef
Hi Terry,
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 01:03:13AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
>
> A general comment, and then a comment on the patch:
>
> I would like to see this code be optional, until such time
> as benchmarks have proven it to be better than the existing
> code, or have proben it to be worse.
The only BSD-related NFSv4 work I know about is at:
http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/download/
The amount of BSD-related information on the CITI NFSv4 page has gradually
diminished over time (that is, originally they proudly stated ports to
Linux and OpenBSD, and now they proudly sta
Salve,
Con DirectLine potrai riferirti ad un unico operatore per tutte le tue
chiamate urbane, interurbane, internazionali e verso cellulari a tariffe
MAI VISTE...
Segnalando il servizio ai tuoi amici, arriverai ad eliminare del tutto la
bolletta telefonica, e se gli amici sono tanti... potrai a
S?ren Schmidt wrote:
> > This was a 4.3 system -- things seem to have changed in
> > the source tree since then.
>
> Nope.
>
> > In 4.3, it's not possible to disable DMA, because it gets
> > reenabled in many places (atapi.c, etc.).
>
> there is no atapi.c...
>
> > This was off-topic for -curr
It seems Terry Lambert wrote:
> "Søren Schmidt" wrote:
> > > This won't work.
> > >
> > > Someone was having the same problem the other day, and
> > > I suggested the same soloution, but after probe, the
> > > damn driver enabled UDMA at attach time anyway.
> >
> > Just set hw.ata.ata_dma="0" in
"Søren Schmidt" wrote:
> > > Maybe _that_ will keep that ata code from over-riding
> > > the bios to disable dma (or maybe the bios just wasn't
> > > doing it's job right ;)
> >
> > This won't work.
> >
> > Someone was having the same problem the other day, and
> > I suggested the same soloution,
Good day!
On Mon, 28 May 2001, Søren Schmidt wrote:
>As promised I've made up a list of reports I've received so far go to
>http://freebsd.dk/ and follow the link.
>
>I also have a patch for the Yamaha's (yamaha-cdr.p1) which also
>can be found via the above URL. Let me know if that make things
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Smith writes:
: Define 'available'? If there are two slices, and they overlap, which one
: should be visible? Or both, with exclusion based on whichever is opened
: first?
All slices that the system considers to be valid. Ditto partitions on
*BSD slices th
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bruce Evans
>writes:
> : The first "ls" should create about 8000 new tun devices by first accessing
> : them via stat(2), but there is some garbage collection, so the second "ls"
> : may show that some of the devices have magically unappeared.
>
> I just want to
Bosko Milekic wrote:
> I plan to commit the new bits within the next week.
> However, as is usually the case with commits of this magnitude,
> I'd like a few more tests to be run by a few more people.
> I've been testing the allocator myself (in several different
> ways, mainly resource ex
24 matches
Mail list logo
