>
> > I've noticed that new PAM segfaults when I'm typing non-existing login
> > at console login prompt. Please fix.
>
> This current, right?
Did I complain?
> I'll sort it out. Thanks for the debug-sleuthing!
Yes, please do it.
-Maxim
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "u
Hi,
with -current as of yesterday evening I got:
/usr: mount pending error: blocks 76 files 9
/usr has (ufs, local, noatime, soft-updates)
Is this critical?
Furthermore psm stopped working. During boot I got:
psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0
psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3
atkbd1: irq 1 on a
If I run sync(1) while background fsck is in progress, sync(1) is
blocked and fsck stops. Using -CURRENT from yesterday, and
SOFTUPDATES (I don't know if it's related).
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP signature
> I've noticed that new PAM segfaults when I'm typing non-existing login
> at console login prompt. Please fix.
This current, right? I'll sort it out. Thanks for the debug-sleuthing!
M
--
Mark Murray
Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubsc
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Bosko Milekic wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:13:12PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> >
> > Right, will do some testing, thanks.. can you give us a bit more than a week
> > tho?
>
> Your prompt reply is extremely encouraging. Thanks! :-
>
> The reason I said "
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Samuel Tardieu writes:
: fine by adding "-I -i 9". It seems to be only my Psion Dacom Gold Card
: that has a problem.
OK. This is the second report of a modem failing (but mine worked,
grump) so I'll look into this some more.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Samuel Tardieu writes:
: I just did that. I got a panic, which I could not save (I cannot panic
: From=20ddb, it just doesn't work). ddb reports the faulty process as
: being ddb, and it relates to "trap 12 being called ..." (I don't
: remember the exact message unfo
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jun Kuriyama writes:
: Can I ignore these messages? Or something wrong in
: sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c?
SOFTUPDATES are not safe in current. Maybe I should write an UPDATING
entry.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-c
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Szilveszter Adam writes:
: > Thanks, it works. I was confused by 'devfs' this time which not show ad0s5
: > slice under /dev until it is actualy mounted.
:
: Yes, devfs really takes some getting used to in the beginning, at least it
: has for me:-)
I'm not sure I l
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:13:12PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> Right, will do some testing, thanks.. can you give us a bit more than a week
> tho?
Your prompt reply is extremely encouraging. Thanks! :-
The reason I said "in the next week" is actually because on Sat. June 23rd
(not th
Right, will do some testing, thanks.. can you give us a bit more than a week
tho?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Hi -current && -alpha,
If you run -CURRENT on multiprocessor alpha, please
please please read this! :-)
The final version (or next to final, depending on how
this final testing stage goes) of the new mbuf allocator which
I have been working on for the past 1.5 months and which I
In fbsd-current John Baldwin writes:
>On 09-Jun-01 Richard Todd wrote:
>> Note that the first panic is somewhat muddled by the fact that, while
>> syncing disks from the vm_object.c panic, it apparently paniced again with
>> "Giant locked" at i386/trap.c:1153. That probably confuses the issue
>
Although I'm ripping all this out and replacing it with new code within
[hopefully] the next week, a backtrace would be nice nonetheless.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 06:00:34PM -0500, Michael Harnois wrote:
> This is from today's current. Can you spot the problem from this or do
> you need a backtra
This is from today's current. Can you spot the problem from this or do
you need a backtrace?
recursed on non-recursive lock (sleep mutex) mbuf free list lock @
../../kern/uipc_mbuf.c:573
--
Michael D. Harnois[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redeemer Lutheran Church
I'm trying to obtain a dump of a (working) cd disk on
FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #17: Sat Apr 28 03:30:53 CEST 2001
I also have a 4.3-STABLE machine but I cannot test on
it because it has no cd...
The machine is all ide/ata, one hd, one cd and a writer.
---[ short-dmesg ]---
atapci0: port ...
ata0: at
On 09-Jun-01 Richard Todd wrote:
> Backtraces posted here in hopes they might enlighten someone.
> This is with kernel source from June 6 (specifically,
> "Sticky Date: 2001.06.06.22.16.24" according to cvs status). The machine
> is a dual PII/400; dmesg follows the backtraces from the two pani
< said:
> + qsort((void *)sp->fts_array, nitems, sizeof(FTSENT *),
> + (int (*) __P((const void *, const void *)))sp->fts_compar);
This is wrong. The declaration of the comparison function should be
fixed, rather than papering over the mistake here.
(This is arguably a deficiency i
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 03:53:18PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> I did not fix the CSRG's libm (-DWANT_CSRG_LIBM) because it
> does not compile with the current sources for the reason of
> missing library functions.
>
CSRG's libm should be deleted before 5.0 is tagged.
I sent in PR misc/1784
Hi,
I've noticed that new PAM segfaults when I'm typing non-existing login
at console login prompt. Please fix.
-Maxim
FreeBSD/i386 (big_brother) (ttyv0)
login: max1
pid 372 (login), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped)
FreeBSD/i386 (big_brother) (ttyv0)
login: max
Password:
Welcome t
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian Somers)
> Date: Fri 8 Jun, 2001
> Subject: Re: Unrecognised CBCP packet [strange problems with ppp(8)]
> To be honest, I have no idea what's going on here. It doesn't even
> look as if you sent any data. I think you may have to ask your ISP
> why they're closi
> "Sam" == Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sam> I just did that. I got a panic, which I could not save (I cannot
Sam> panic From ddb, it just doesn't work). ddb reports the faulty
Sam> process as being ddb, and it relates to "trap 12 being called
Sam> ..." (I don't remember the exa
> With new PPP I can't dial to my provider anymore. Two variants:
>
> 1) PPP says "Clearing choked output queue" and connection stuck forever
> with carrier on. Nothing else happens.
>
> 2) PPP says "Too many IPCP NAKs sent - abandoning negotiation" and drop
> carrier forever without further red
Hi!
The attached patch enables us to restore the -Werror bit of
the WARNS feature by fixing relevant headers and adding one
new header, complex.h, aligned with the POSIX.1-200x draft.
I did not fix the CSRG's libm (-DWANT_CSRG_LIBM) because it
does not compile with the current sources for the re
> "Warner" == Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Warner> In summary:
Warner> o Use the same config file you used before.
Warner> o Update pccardd
Warner> o Add "-I -i 9" to pccardd_flags (if your pcic's irq is 9).
Warner> o rebuild and reinstall the kernel.
Warner> o reboot. Send your p
I got panic with recently updated box. Brief trackback is here:
panic()
deallocate_dependencies()
softdep_setup_freeblocks()
ffs_truncate()
handle_workitem_remove()
softdep_setup_remove()
ufs_dirremove()
ufs_rmdir()
ufs_vnoperate()
rmdir()
syscall()
syscall_with_err_pushed()
--
Jun Kuriyama
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 19:07:44 +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
>
> I updated my notebook today and I got some messages on my console.
>
> handle_written_filepage: active pagedep
> handle_written_filepage: active pagedep
> handle_written_filepage: active pagedep
> ...
I can confirm that I saw them
I updated my notebook today and I got some messages on my console.
handle_written_filepage: active pagedep
handle_written_filepage: active pagedep
handle_written_filepage: active pagedep
...
Can I ignore these messages? Or something wrong in
sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c?
--
Jun Kuriyama <[EMA
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 15:25:27 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> >
> > > I just found that msdosfs can't mount legal Extended partition because
> > > required info is few blocks later in that case, not
The potential for breakage is there, but I've tested just about everything
I can think of for now. Ideally there should not be any user visible
differences.
In a nutshell:
- several poorly thought out API's for doing some stuff that cam etc needed
has been removed with extreme prejudice (resourc
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 07:32:57 +0200, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> I thought of two components, like ru_RU, en_US, or de_DE. AFAICT,
> that's the common practice i've seen in the other Unices.
Lets swith to i18n list, I Cc: here first time to notice -current readers.
> > But then we need to rewrite
Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2001-Jun-11 21:46:55 -0500, Steve Hocking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
rote:
> >I see that cvs-cur stuff hasn't been generated since the beginning of May -
>
> cvs-cur _is_ being generated[1], it just not being mirrored on
> ftp.freebsd.org at present. When I asked Jordan
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 01:01:02PM +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:47:43 +0200, Szilveszter Adam wrote:
> >
> > In your situation I would try ad0s5 and onwards. If you do not have the
> > device node under /dev, so create it:-) (No worries I have also forgotten
> > ho
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:47:43 +0200, Szilveszter Adam wrote:
>
> In your situation I would try ad0s5 and onwards. If you do not have the
> device node under /dev, so create it:-) (No worries I have also forgotten
> how to do such mounts on occasion before:-)
Thanks, it works. I was confused b
Hello Ache,
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 12:08:22PM +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 15:25:27 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> >
> > > I just found that msdosfs can't mount legal Extended partition because
> > > required info is fe
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 15:25:27 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
>
> > I just found that msdosfs can't mount legal Extended partition because
> > required info is few blocks later in that case, not immediately as for
> > Primary partition. Is it known pro
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:45:58 +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> On 11-Jun-2001 Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> > With new PPP I can't dial to my provider anymore. Two variants:
> >
> > 1) PPP says "Clearing choked output queue" and connection stuck forever
> > with carrier on. Nothing else hap
37 matches
Mail list logo
