RE: Problems with -CURRENT

2001-04-13 Thread Chris Knight
Howdy, I thought it was just me that had the problem, but it appears to be the recent dirpref commit. I managed to get a working system by booting to single user, fsck'ing all partitions, then using tunefs to specify the number of files per directory to be greater than zero. I also specified the

Re: NFS export to netgroup with duplicate hosts

2001-04-13 Thread Matt Dillon
:on BSD, and we can do more finetuning than on Solaris itself. Also :mountd and export seems to support more features than in Solaris, :according to the manpage. : :Could this export restriction change in future with nfsv4, when nfs :does get stateful (I've heard about that the stateless behaviour

Re: miibus/fxp intel etherexpress broken

2001-04-13 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Darren Henderson writes: > > I had a functional install of -current which was created back on Jan 11th of > this year. > > I cvsup'd yesterday (4/12. I had also tried this on 4/4) fixxed what I > needed too from UPDATING and RELNOTES, built and installed world and a new > kernel. > >

RE: Problems with -CURRENT

2001-04-13 Thread John Baldwin
On 13-Apr-01 Matthew Schlegel wrote: > I have been working on doing an update to the latest -CURRENT (last cvsup for > this upgrade attempt was this morning at about 9:30 PDT) for the last > couple days from : > FreeBSD msops.crossgain.com 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT >#0: Wed Jun 28 13:23:44

Problems with -CURRENT

2001-04-13 Thread Matthew Schlegel
I have been working on doing an update to the latest -CURRENT (last cvsup for this upgrade attempt was this morning at about 9:30 PDT) for the last couple days from : FreeBSD msops.crossgain.com 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Jun 28 13:23:44 PDT 2000 Right now I can boot into single user

Re: readline.h 1.12 incompatible with gdb.291/gdb/top.c 1.2, I think

2001-04-13 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 06:40:42PM +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > Yes. Backward-compatible prototypes was enabled very recently > to help old applications. I didn't expect it break gdb compilation again I need to update my box to test. It will probably be 2-3 hours and it will be fixed. To

Re: ISO image available?

2001-04-13 Thread Jordan Hubbard
> Do you have a script that will pull in the latest snapshot and write an > ISO image? This would be a nice addition to the supplied documentation. No, since I don't do release engineering that way, but someone else should certainly feel free to do this. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail t

miibus/fxp intel etherexpress broken

2001-04-13 Thread Darren Henderson
I had a functional install of -current which was created back on Jan 11th of this year. I cvsup'd yesterday (4/12. I had also tried this on 4/4) fixxed what I needed too from UPDATING and RELNOTES, built and installed world and a new kernel. fxp now fails. Searching back I saw that fxp now re

Re: readline.h 1.12 incompatible with gdb.291/gdb/top.c 1.2, I think

2001-04-13 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 18:40:42 +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 07:27:53 -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > > Yes. Backward-compatible prototypes was enabled very recently > to help old applications. I didn't expect it break gdb compilation again > :-( > > David, please r

Re: readline.h 1.12 incompatible with gdb.291/gdb/top.c 1.2, I think

2001-04-13 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 07:27:53 -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: Yes. Backward-compatible prototypes was enabled very recently to help old applications. I didn't expect it break gdb compilation again :-( David, please remove offending prototype from top.c > Others have mentioned that world appear

readline.h 1.12 incompatible with gdb.291/gdb/top.c 1.2, I think

2001-04-13 Thread David Wolfskill
Others have mentioned that world appears broken on -current; happened to me as well, and it appears that r1.12 of libreadline/readline.h has exposed a definition of filename_completion_function() that conflicts with the one in gdb.291/gdb/top.c: src/contrib/libreadline/readline.h 2001/04/12 17:1

Re: SOMAXCONN -- not tunable?

2001-04-13 Thread Garrett Wollman
< said: > Actually, the correct fix is most likely to redefine it to -1. :) POSIX.1-200x draft 5 has this to say: Implementations shall support values of backlog up to SOMAXCONN, defined in If listen( ) is called with a backlog argument value that is less than

Re: SOMAXCONN -- not tunable?

2001-04-13 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010412 22:25] wrote: > > Changing the actual limit using either the sysctl or an option breaks > > SOMAXCONN. I think the correct fix is to never define it change > > whatever uses it to use sysconf(_SC_SOMAXCONN).

Re: SOMAXCONN -- not tunable?

2001-04-13 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010412 22:25] wrote: > On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Jonathan Lemon wrote: > > > In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >you write: > > >Here are patches to make SOMAXCONN tunable from the config files. > > > > > >Right now, it's not possible to override SOMAXCONN. > > > >

Buildworld failure. [Re: make release Börked...]

2001-04-13 Thread NAKAJI Hiroyuki
My buildworld today also fails at gdb. cc -O -pipe -D_GNU_SOURCE -I- -I. -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/i386 -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/../libbfd/i386 -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/../../../../contrib/binutils/include -Dprint_insn_i386=p

make release Börked...

2001-04-13 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
===> gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb install -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 gdb /syv/release/usr/libexec/elf install: gdb: No such file or directory *** Error code 71 Stop in /syv/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb. *** Error code 1 : -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED