Re: Call for review... PR 25577

2001-03-31 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Brooks Davis wrote: > If anyone wants to try it one -stable, there's a patch against it at: > > http://www.one-eyed-alien.net/~brooks/FreeBSD/ifconfig.diff-stable Cool, thanks for making this available. > The fact that wi hasn't been repo-copied in to sys/dev in stab

Re: Call for review... PR 25577

2001-03-31 Thread Bruce A. Mah
I stupidly wrote: > it is not immediately obvious to me how to > set ad-hoc mode using ifconfig(8)). Please disregard...I see it now. Must be my allergy meds, yeah, that's it... :-) Bruce. PGP signature

Re: Interesting backtrace...

2001-03-31 Thread Leif Neland
On 18 Mar 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Anyway, here's the backtrace: > > root@des /var/crash# gdb -k ... > This GDB was configured as "i386-unknown-freebsd". > (kgdb) source ~des/kgdb <-- What's in here? I guess it is commands to load the crash dump into the debugger. Could you post it,

Re: Call for review... PR 25577

2001-03-31 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jordan Hubbard writes: > >Cool. Does this mean that any of the foocontrol programs can go away? > > As far as I can see, anything short of firmware updates can be > done by ifconfig and therefore, presumably, f

Re: third party shared library and ldconfig

2001-03-31 Thread Clive Lin
Hi, I'm just curious, why not just redefine ldconfig_paths in /etc/rc.conf, which is already in /etc/defaults/rc.conf ? Or install a script in ${PREFIX}/etc/rc.d .. this is how ports like postgresql or mysql, achive this goal. On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 10:20:25PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:

third party shared library and ldconfig

2001-03-31 Thread Steve Kargl
I recently installed NAGWare's Fortran 95 compiler, and it installed its shared libraries into /usr/local/lib/NAGWare. To get the compiler to work, I of course needed to use "ldconfig -m". When I rebooted the system, I found that the ldconfig portion of /etc/rc does not recurse into subdirector

Re: is it supposed to be this broken?

2001-03-31 Thread Mike Smith
> > > ppc1: at port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77b irq 7 drq 3 on > > > isa0 > > > > That's because the PnP entity is still matched. You can't disable PnP > > devices; it just doesn't work that way. 8) > > You mean it's impossible to disable lpt/floppy in a pnp system > and use thier IRQs for anyt

buildkernel fails with random device

2001-03-31 Thread Andrew Newlands
If I attempt to build a kernel with the random device it bombs out with this message: Error output: make: don't know how to make /usr/src/sys/crypto/rijndael/rijndael-alg-fst.c. Stop The kernel build happily if I comment out the random device in the configuration file. Cheers, Andrew

Re: is it supposed to be this broken?

2001-03-31 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alfred Perlstein writes: : You mean it's impossible to disable lpt/floppy in a pnp system : and use thier IRQs for anything else unless you remove the drivers : from the kernel? That's right. : Why? because no one has implement it. : Also, is there any system in

Re: is it supposed to be this broken?

2001-03-31 Thread Adam
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >* Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010331 12:41] wrote: >> > This is cute... >> > >> > If you disable a device using /boot/device.hints like so: >> > hint.ppc.0.disabled="1" >> > hint.ppc.1.disabled="1" >> > hint.ppbus.0.disabled="1" >> > hint.ppbus.1.

Re: is it supposed to be this broken?

2001-03-31 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010331 12:41] wrote: > > This is cute... > > > > If you disable a device using /boot/device.hints like so: > > hint.ppc.0.disabled="1" > > hint.ppc.1.disabled="1" > > hint.ppbus.0.disabled="1" > > hint.ppbus.1.disabled="1" > > > > you get this: > > ppc1: at por

Re: is it supposed to be this broken?

2001-03-31 Thread Mike Smith
> This is cute... > > If you disable a device using /boot/device.hints like so: > hint.ppc.0.disabled="1" > hint.ppc.1.disabled="1" > hint.ppbus.0.disabled="1" > hint.ppbus.1.disabled="1" > > you get this: > ppc1: at port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77b irq 7 drq 3 on > isa0 That's because the PnP en

Re: i586 FP optimizations hosed.

2001-03-31 Thread Leif Neland
- Original Message - From: "Mark Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 7:45 AM Subject: i586 FP optimizations hosed. > Hi > > I have an SMP kernel with I586 and I686 support. If I boot it > on a 686 it works. On a 586 it craps out with > > C

subscribe

2001-03-31 Thread Christian dang
subscribe To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: is it supposed to be this broken?

2001-03-31 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alfred Perlstein writes: : This is cute... : hint.ppc.1.disabled="1" : ppc1: at port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77b irq 7 drq 3 on : isa0 That should work. However, if it doesn't, consider removing the 'at' lines from your hints file. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail

Re: is it supposed to be this broken?

2001-03-31 Thread Dima Dorfman
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What I'd like you to do is try to disable your floppy drive > and/or lpt port without removing it from your kernel. > > If it's possible please let me know. It works for me by just sticking 'hint.fd.0.disabled="1"' into /boot/device.hints. I.e., I

RE: usb modems

2001-03-31 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 30-Mar-01 Adrian Browne wrote: > I was wondering if anyone has had any success with a usb isdn 3com modem or > other usb modem types. I have a usb scanner and printer that works great on > release 5.0-20010120, but i have failed miserably to get a usb/modem to > work. Does anyone know? or

Re: Call for review... PR 25577

2001-03-31 Thread Brooks Davis
On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 10:16:44AM +0100, Duncan Barclay wrote: > Can I suggest you add a DS22 for DS 22Mb/s which is going through final > approvals at the IEEE. I've added it and updated the diff for -current. I'll mess with the -stable diff Thursday when I get back from my short vacation. >

is it supposed to be this broken?

2001-03-31 Thread Alfred Perlstein
This is cute... If you disable a device using /boot/device.hints like so: hint.ppc.0.disabled="1" hint.ppc.1.disabled="1" hint.ppbus.0.disabled="1" hint.ppbus.1.disabled="1" you get this: ppc1: at port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77b irq 7 drq 3 on isa0 or how about this: hint.fdc.0.at="isa" hint.fd

Re: Call for review... PR 25577

2001-03-31 Thread Duncan Barclay
Hi Brooks, Can I suggest you add a DS22 for DS 22Mb/s which is going through final approvals at the IEEE. I'll wait for these patches to settle down and merge the functionality into the raylink driver. Are you planning on making a unified interface for things like the signal strenght cache? Du