On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 01:00:08AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Pascal Hofstee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > With a CURRENT build/installworld from yesterday ... i get a VERY unstable
> > system that page faults under the slightest CPU load (e.g. playing MP3's)
>
> What kind of CPU?
AMD
On 19 Mar 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On 19 Mar 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > > Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > Wrong. I fixed machdep.c to compute and print the bandwidth correctly:
> > > I mean npx.c. I'll commit
On 19 Mar 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Anyway, the bug is not K6-specific - I guess the reason why we're only
> seeing it on K6's is that they're the only 586-class CPUs that are
> fast enough to still be in widespread use.
I have the same panics in one of my pentium 166 mmx boxes. Even som
In muc.lists.freebsd.current, you wrote:
>
> Anyone have any experience with the Abit BP6 motherboards? I've been
> reporting and talking about problems with -CURRENT the past little while,
> where when I start X, it pretty much dies soon after ... well, this
> weekend, I needed to make my syste
Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 19 Mar 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Wrong. I fixed machdep.c to compute and print the bandwidth correctly:
> > I mean npx.c. I'll commit the fix in a second.
> Please send it to the maintaine
On 19 Mar 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Wrong. I fixed machdep.c to compute and print the bandwidth correctly:
>
> I mean npx.c. I'll commit the fix in a second.
Please send it to the maintainer for review.
Bruce
To Unsubscribe: send m
On 19 Mar 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > K6-2's aren't really i586's and i586_bzero should never be used for
> > them (generic bzero is faster),
>
> Wrong. I fixed machdep.c to compute and print the bandwidth correctly:
Wrong yourself. The fpu is
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Bruce Evans wrote:
> K6-2's aren't really i586's and i586_bzero should never be used for
> them (generic bzero is faster), but there is apparently another
> bug that may cause them to be used. From des's dmesg output:
>
> > i586_bzero() bandwidth = -1980152482 bytes/sec
>
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Wrong. I fixed machdep.c to compute and print the bandwidth correctly:
I mean npx.c. I'll commit the fix in a second.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-curren
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can you throw some extra tests in there to make sure m isn't NULL? Also, you
> might want to check VM_PAGE_TO_PHYS(m) for any weird values.
No need - David and Jake already tracked it down to evilness in
i586_bzero().
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMA
Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> K6-2's aren't really i586's and i586_bzero should never be used for
> them (generic bzero is faster),
Wrong. I fixed machdep.c to compute and print the bandwidth correctly:
des@des ~% egrep '(CPU|bzero)' /var/run/dmesg.boot
CPU: AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor (
On 18-Mar-01 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> I finally caught a backtrace from one of those recurring stack smash
> panics. I've been getting a few of these every day for a couple of
> weeks now but never caught a dump; I caught this one by typing 'panic'
> immediately instead of trying to get a tra
On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, David Malone wrote:
> Presumably what is happening is i586_bzero begins and finds that
> PCPU(NPXPROC) is not zero, so it decides to preserve the fpu
> registers. Then something interrupts it, but doesn't restore
> PCPU(NPXPROC). When i586_bzero returns it uses the first 8 by
Pascal Hofstee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With a CURRENT build/installworld from yesterday ... i get a VERY unstable
> system that page faults under the slightest CPU load (e.g. playing MP3's)
What kind of CPU?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMA
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 04:41:03PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> I finally caught a backtrace from one of those recurring stack smash
> panics. I've been getting a few of these every day for a couple of
> weeks now but never caught a dump; I caught this one by typing 'panic'
> immediately in
Andrea Campi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I didn't state it explicitely but yes, I dropped to single user from
> multi user, remounted / to ro, fsck'ed it.
Don't do that. It doesn't work the way it's supposed to.
>I only did this because I
> must conf
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andrea Campi writes:
>
>Anyway, that was not my point. If I reboot into single-user, and am thus sure
>to have the / fs in a clean, consistent state, should I expect growfs to work
>in a safe way? If so, we should document it.
I think it is still unlikely to be com
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 10:41:20PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Andrea Campi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Sorry? In single user with a readonly / and nothing else? I would have to be
> > EXTREMELY unlucky to get any other access while the fs is inconsistent ;-)
>
> Just because you drop
Andrea Campi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry? In single user with a readonly / and nothing else? I would have to be
> EXTREMELY unlucky to get any other access while the fs is inconsistent ;-)
Just because you dropped to single-user mode (from multi-user, as I
recall from your previous mail)
Verbose boot log as requested.
Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #63: Sun Mar 18 22:21:49 CET 2001
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Doug,
Database access in a shell script ? Tell me how to do this and
I'll do. Else I'll rewrite mergemaster in perl.
Yes - I think this is a good idea, shell-scripts just suck !
And mergemaster is badly formatted too, it's not easy to programm
like this (yes I know the formatting is needed to p
> Ian Dowse wrote:
> >
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Smith writes:
> > >
> > >I don't quite understand Paul's reasoning, though; it's not actually
> > >useful to unload/reload parts of a device's bus attachment without
> > >unloading/reloading all the downstream parts of the driver.
>
Valentin Nechayev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I did not reported them yet because of lack of understanding
> what's happen because pmap_zero_page() call is occured in vm_fault()
> without this call in source code ;|
It's called by vm_page_zero_fill() which is inlined and therefore
doesn't show
Hi Doug and all others.
here is a first version of the MD5 mergemaster. It works like this:
No checksum in existing /etc file
-
- If a installed version of a /etc file is the same as the temproot
version, we add a md5 checksum to the cvs-header of the file a
Ian Dowse wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Smith writes:
> >
> >I don't quite understand Paul's reasoning, though; it's not actually
> >useful to unload/reload parts of a device's bus attachment without
> >unloading/reloading all the downstream parts of the driver.
What do you mea
Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 16:41:03, des (Dag-Erling Smorgrav) wrote about "Interesting
backtrace...":
> I finally caught a backtrace from one of those recurring stack smash
> panics. I've been getting a few of these every day for a couple of
> weeks now but never caught a dump; I caught this one by
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 04:41:03PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> I finally caught a backtrace from one of those recurring stack smash
> panics. I've been getting a few of these every day for a couple of
> weeks now but never caught a dump; I caught this one by typing 'panic'
> immediately in
> This was completely untested by us, and is not guaranteed to work! I think
> you were lucky. We move and change blocks on the filesystem, during some
> time the filesystem is NOT consitent, so if one of those files is accessed than
> you might run into a panic.
Sorry? In single user with a read
I finally caught a backtrace from one of those recurring stack smash
panics. I've been getting a few of these every day for a couple of
weeks now but never caught a dump; I caught this one by typing 'panic'
immediately instead of trying to get a trace at the ddb prompt first.
These panics invaria
ache> Fix already commited in -current strptime.c v1.23 and not yet in
ache> -stable.
Very glad to hear that, thank you.
We are in a freeze stage, but are there any chances to merge this into
4-stable... ah, maybe I'm dreamin' :-)
-- -
Makoto `MAR' MATSUSHITA
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMA
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Smith writes:
>
>I don't quite understand Paul's reasoning, though; it's not actually
>useful to unload/reload parts of a device's bus attachment without
>unloading/reloading all the downstream parts of the driver.
>
>I think the fix should probably be commit
According to Brooks Davis:
> I'm seeing a very strange problem with ps. I was calling "ps -U
Speaking of ps, since we moved into SMPng, almost all processes seems to have
the 'D' state... I guess it is expected but a little strange, no?
388 [13:28] roberto@sidhe:~> ps aux
USER PID %CPU %ME
It seems Michael Kirstein wrote:
> Hello
>
> There seems to be a littel error in atacontrol.c
>
> I sugesst:
>
> diff -r1.3 atacontrol.c
> 78a79
> > exit(1);
> 133a135,136
> > if (argc == 1)
> > usage();
Fixes are underways...
-Søren
To Unsubscribe: send mail
Hello
There seems to be a littel error in atacontrol.c
I sugesst:
diff -r1.3 atacontrol.c
78a79
> exit(1);
133a135,136
> if (argc == 1)
> usage();
Best Regards
Michael Kirstein
--
Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 09:37:52 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 14:19:13 +0900, Makoto MATSUSHITA wrote:
>
> > Our strptime(3) implementation distinguishs '%A' and '%a', just like
> > strftime(3) does. However, the Single UNIX Specification v2 doesn't
>
>
> Upgrade yo
35 matches
Mail list logo
