Hello!
I just wanted to tell you quickly that you can scrap the vague reports I
made about network problems yesterday... (including ssh and ftp hangs...)
*Sigh...* I thought I was quite sure it was a FreeBSD problem, processes
really appeared to be hung. And besides, never thought that packet lo
On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 18:32 +0100, Leif Neland wrote:
>
> My isp's router is sending me IGMP queries.
>
> 18:25:07.850008 212.242.151.2 > 224.0.0.1: 212.242.151.2 >
> 224.0.0.1: igmp v2 query [intvl 10]igmp query [ttl 1]
Ask your provider to not do it. :) Do you run any multicast
enabled app
I already have and that fixed it.
John Baldwin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> On 30-Dec-00 Paul Saab wrote:
> > This will not fix the problem. I even removed rev 1.57-1.58 and it
> > still causes gdb to lockup the system.
>
> Try backing out the proctree lock.
>
> --
>
> John Baldwin <[EMA
A bug in specfs's fsync dating back to Kirk's original softupdates work
( which required a similar mark/scan fix to the FFS fsync ) appears to
have been exposed by recent pageout peformance commits I made.
I've committed a mark/scan fix to specfs's fsync, which appears
to so
On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 12:36:36PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
> That's ok. I seem to have goofed up in kern_sig.c. Please try the (untested)
> patch at http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/kern_sig.patch.
Well, the kernel is ready and the patch appears to work. Ie I can run a
large dirlisting on
On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 12:36:36PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
> That's ok. I seem to have goofed up in kern_sig.c. Please try the (untested)
> patch at http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/kern_sig.patch.
OK, trying it right now... it applied cleanly, but it will take sometime
until the compile
On 30-Dec-00 Szilveszter Adam wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 12:23:58PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>> On 30-Dec-00 Szilveszter Adam wrote:
>> > On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 12:08:48PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 30-Dec-00 Michael Harnois wrote:
>> >> > panic: lockable mtx_enter()
On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 12:23:58PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 30-Dec-00 Szilveszter Adam wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 12:08:48PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
> >>
> >> On 30-Dec-00 Michael Harnois wrote:
> >> > panic: lockable mtx_enter() of lockmgr interlock when not legal @
> >> > .
On 30-Dec-00 Szilveszter Adam wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 12:08:48PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>> On 30-Dec-00 Michael Harnois wrote:
>> > panic: lockable mtx_enter() of lockmgr interlock when not legal @
>> > ../../kern/kern_lock.c: 247
>> >
>> > which is
>> >
>> > mtx_enter(lkp->lk_
On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 12:08:48PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 30-Dec-00 Michael Harnois wrote:
> > panic: lockable mtx_enter() of lockmgr interlock when not legal @
> > ../../kern/kern_lock.c: 247
> >
> > which is
> >
> > mtx_enter(lkp->lk_interlock, MTX_DEF);
>
> We need to know where
On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 11:46:15AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> A checkin was just made that fixed a mutex that was being held incorrectly
> in psignal, which features in your stack trace.
>
> It's possible that this has been fixed in the last 24 hours.
Hello Julian!
If you are referring to
On 30-Dec-00 Michael Harnois wrote:
> panic: lockable mtx_enter() of lockmgr interlock when not legal @
> ../../kern/kern_lock.c: 247
>
> which is
>
> mtx_enter(lkp->lk_interlock, MTX_DEF);
We need to know where interrupts were disabled (since that is what makes the
blockable mtx_enter() not l
On 30-Dec-00 Paul Saab wrote:
> This will not fix the problem. I even removed rev 1.57-1.58 and it
> still causes gdb to lockup the system.
Try backing out the proctree lock.
--
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
PGP Key: http://www.Baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc
"
A checkin was just made that fixed a mutex that was being held incorrectly
in psignal, which features in your stack trace.
It's possible that this has been fixed in the last 24 hours.
Szilveszter Adam wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 09:41:08AM -0600, Michael Harnois wrote:
> > panic: lockab
POSIX says that getlogin_r should return an int, not a char *. Our
implementation is also broken; it will only work the first time.
Since we've already bumped libc version number, anyone mind if I
fix it?
--
Dan Eischen
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-
On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 11:58:05AM -0500, Raymond Hicks wrote:
> Please respond directly to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as I am not on this mailing
> list..
>
> I am hoping that this is not something I am doing wrong ... the procedur
> ei followed was cvsup src and ports... using supfile in handbook for
My isp's router is sending me IGMP queries.
18:25:07.850008 212.242.151.2 > 224.0.0.1: 212.242.151.2 > 224.0.0.1: igmp
v2 query [intvl 10]igmp query [ttl 1]
I think it keeps my user-ppp connection open, even if I have this rule in my
firewall:
$fwcmd add 65432 deny ip from 212.242.151.2 to any
On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 09:41:08AM -0600, Michael Harnois wrote:
> panic: lockable mtx_enter() of lockmgr interlock when not legal @
>../../kern/kern_lock.c: 247
Hello!
OK, so since nobody has done it before me, I just decided to investigate a
bit. Remember, that I am not a kernel hacker, so I
Please respond directly to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as I am not on this mailing
list..
I am hoping that this is not something I am doing wrong ... the procedur
ei followed was cvsup src and ports... using supfile in handbook for
going to current.. from there i did /usr/src make buildworld then make
i
panic: lockable mtx_enter() of lockmgr interlock when not legal @
../../kern/kern_lock.c: 247
which is
mtx_enter(lkp->lk_interlock, MTX_DEF);
my system is an i386 UP with two dc cards and a kernel configured as
follows:
machine i386
cpu I586_CPU
cpu I686_CPU
id
This gives an almost -current kernel without the hangs:
setenv TZ PST8PDT
cvs -q update -P -d -D "2000-12-26 10:00"
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attrib
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 04:19:38PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> I'd appreciate it if those who are having issues with gdb were to
> try this patch and let me know if it fixes things.
Sorry, but gdb keeps hanging my box after this patch.
In fact, the behaviour didn't changed.
> Index: sys_p
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 10:57:10PM +0100, Szilveszter Adam wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Maybe this is related, maybe not... I upgraded to the latest CURRENT
> available this morning and now I also see occasional (albeit short) hangs
> sometimes, although the machine seems to be responsive otherwise.
>
> Bu
This will not fix the problem. I even removed rev 1.57-1.58 and it
still causes gdb to lockup the system.
Szilveszter Adam ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hello everybody!
>
> ps 2000/12/29 16:44:44 PST
>
> Modified files:
> sys/kern sys_process.c
> Log:
> Pass me
24 matches
Mail list logo