> seems to be going ok, but I pick up a kernel panic whilst printing.
Ditto. Also on a dual-cpu machine, also a really recent CURRENT.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mai
Please review. This syncs up our code with some NetBSD changes, as well
as attempting to sync rwall up with wall.
Kris
Index: wall/wall.c
===
RCS file: /mnt/ncvs/src/usr.bin/wall/wall.c,v
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -r1.15 wall
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 10:28:53PM +0100, Leif Neland wrote:
> Could this be the reason why Avp (virusscanner) for FreeBSD 4X just dumps
> core on Fbsd current?
> It works on a Fbsd stable.
Could be malloc.conf defaults. i.e. a bug in avp triggered by the
debugging /etc/malloc.conf settings in -c
Christian Carstensen wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, Rogier R. Mulhuijzen wrote:
>
> > 1) is this a CardBus card maybe?
>
> It happens with
>
>a) Lucent WaveLAN (silver)
>b) 3com 3c589d
>
>
> > 2) What does 'pccardc dumpcis' return?
>
> Code 85 not found
> Code 85 not found
> code Unkn
"David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 01:08:37AM +0100, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
> > > Its in the scrollback buffer.
> >
> > and how do you access the scroll-back buffer if you are not front to the
> > console (read remote) ?
>
> Do you mean remotely loged in acros
Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 24 Nov, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
>
> >> >> The attached patch is a "proof-of-concept" on which I would like
> >> >> to get some comments:
> >> >
> >> > I'm only a moronic user, but this would make my life easier. My machine
> >> > switches in
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 03:34:49PM -0800, Derek Schene' wrote:
> I tried this-
>
> > I'd suggest just symlinking libc.so.4 to libc.so.5, nothing terrible
> > should happen.
Since nothing has changed in the -CURRENT libc yet, this will work.
BTW, you'd want to do the same for libc_r.so.4.
Thanks for everyone's input, I feel I'm getting closer and see where my previous
thinking had gone wrong.
I tried this-
> I'd suggest just symlinking libc.so.4 to libc.so.5, nothing terrible
> should happen.
and now when booting get-
Local package initialization:fopen: No such file or
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 18:01:33 -0500 (EST), Bosko Milekic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> jlemon, I think you may want to remove the include for
> sys/mbuf.h in if_var.h if it isn't needed (try) -- I think this
> is what may be screwing up netstat.
I tried your suggestion and it got me
No biggie guys...
jlemon, I think you may want to remove the include for sys/mbuf.h in
if_var.h if it isn't needed (try) -- I think this is what may be screwing
up netstat.
Sorry, Steve, for this inconvenience, but this stuff does occasionally
happen in -CURRENT. :-)
On Sat, 25 No
I'm finally having enough time again to look at FreeBSD again, so I went
back and I'm looking at my port complaints. In looking at a2ps, after I
reinstalled it fresh (so if it'd been changed I would see those) I see it
seems to be going ok, but I pick up a kernel panic whilst printing.
The proce
Gentlemen,
I'm holding up on committing this as we speak as I believe the
counter manipulations become illegal following the ifq locking commits.
This is good as it will give us an opportunity/bigger reason to review
this code further before making a commit.
Feel free to
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 03:07:05PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am not sure, if anybody care for this fix, but I just copied libc.so.5
> to libc.so.4 when kde was complaining about not finding it. I am not sure
> if this should work, but it does work just fine...
It will work for a while.
I am not sure, if anybody care for this fix, but I just copied libc.so.5
to libc.so.4 when kde was complaining about not finding it. I am not sure
if this should work, but it does work just fine...
JAn
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 12:44:34PM -0600, Bill Fu
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 12:44:34PM -0600, Bill Fumerola wrote:
> > Huh? Why the worst of both worlds??
>
> Incompatible changes AND no way to differentiate between the two. (plus we
> don't even know what changed it, so we have no way of telling people "your
> libc before X won't work with binar
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 10:28:53PM +0100, Leif Neland wrote:
> Could this be the reason why Avp (virusscanner) for FreeBSD 4X just dumps
> core on Fbsd current?
> It works on a Fbsd stable.
no, if it was missing the proper version of libc, the linker would let you
know about it. coredump is compl
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 01:08:37AM +0100, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
> > Its in the scrollback buffer.
>
> and how do you access the scroll-back buffer if you are not front to the
> console (read remote) ?
Do you mean remotely loged in across the network, or a serial [remote]
console? If you mean t
Could this be the reason why Avp (virusscanner) for FreeBSD 4X just dumps
core on Fbsd current?
It works on a Fbsd stable.
Leif
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
===> usr.bin/netstat
cc -O -pipe -Wall -DIPSEC -DINET6 -DIPSEC -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c
/usr/src/usr.bin/netstat/if.c
In file included from /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/net/if_var.h:78,
from /usr/src/usr.bin/netstat/if.c:49:
/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chuck Paterson writes:
>
> Is there reason to believe that we won't have dead lock
>problems from the M_WAITOK? It seems like that if anything in
>the path needed to full fill the malloc needs to log there
>is a problem.
We don't otherwise treat the /dev/cons
Is there reason to believe that we won't have dead lock
problems from the M_WAITOK? It seems like that if anything in
the path needed to full fill the malloc needs to log there
is a problem.
Chuck
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the
Hi,
This works ! I was the dummynet victim due to dummynet, but now
I'm saved :-) Hopes this to be committed soon.
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 11:40:19AM +0800, Bosko Milekic wrote:
> Please try this patch and report:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~bmilekic/ip_pipe.diff
--
CirX - This sit
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 03:08:34AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> In this case it doesn't matter -- "a fresh hard drive" and "local
> package" implies that the -current packages on ftp.freebsd.org haven't
> been built since the bump and are thus slightly out dated.
Plus all 3rd party software tha
LCA systems doesn't like probing after PCI slot 19.
Probing slot 20 panics the system.
The following patch made it into single user mode on my AXPpci33.
I asume it will also work on multias.
I can't tell more as the tested system is a 4.1-RELEASE and I need
to update the world before further testi
cc -O -pipe -march=i686
-I/usr/src/kerberosIV/libexec/kipd/../../../crypto/kerberosIV/include
-I/usr/src/kerberosIV/libexec/kipd/../../../crypto/kerberosIV/lib/roken
-I/usr/src/kerberosIV/libexec/kipd/../../../crypto/kerberosIV/lib/krb
-I/usr/src/kerberosIV/libexec/kipd/../../../crypto/kerb
I'm missing the ithread processes for irq10 and irq15.
As you can see in the dmesg output there are de devices that
are using the irqs in question.
I asume that they are only missing in the list as the devices are
working fine.
PID TT STAT TIME COMMAND
0 ?? DLs0:00.16 (swapper
This is strange. I deinstalled all kde11 type ports and then made
installed the kde2 port. However, each time I got and startx, I stay with
kde 1.1.2. I am using Xfree86 4.01 and a reasonably recent version of
CURRENT. Has anybody got an explanation for this behavior?
To Unsubscribe: send mail
In message <1050.974925641@critter>, Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
>
> The attached patch is a "proof-of-concept" on which I would like
> to get some comments:
>
> It bugs me big time that the output from /etc/rc and all other output
> to /dev/console is volatile and lost once it scrolls of your con
Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Eivind Eklund wrote:
> > (Based on suggestion from Robert Watson.)
> >
> > I want to enable INVARIANTS by default in -current. This result in some
> > slowdown, but it also makes it more likely that we'll find bugs quickly.
> > People that want to run -
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 02:44:08AM -0600, Bill Fumerola wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 12:18:43AM -0800, Derek Schene' wrote:
> > On a fresh hard drive I installed 5.0 20001123 Current and got the
> > following after installation:
> >
> > Local package initialization:/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: S
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 12:18:43AM -0800, Derek Schene' wrote:
> On a fresh hard drive I installed 5.0 20001123 Current and got the
> following after installation:
>
> Local package initialization:/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object
> "libc.so.4" not found
we bumped the libc version to 5, bu
On a fresh hard drive I installed 5.0 20001123 Current and got the
following after installation:
Local package initialization:/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object
"libc.so.4" not found
I tried again from scratch with 5.0 20001124 Current and have the same
problem.
This affects emacs, apache,
32 matches
Mail list logo
