In the last episode (May 05), Jean-Marc Zucconi said:
> Here is something I don't understand:
>
> $ sh -c '/usr/bin/time ./a.out'
> 2.40 real 2.38 user 0.01 sys
> $ /usr/bin/time ./a.out
> 7.19 real 7.19 user 0.00 sys
>
> The same program is 3 t
On Fri, 5 May 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote:
# It's not clear that you installed the openssl.cnf file before making the
# cert - can you confirm?
Yes I did. I put it in /etc/ssl as you suggested.
-steve
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the bod
On Fri, 5 May 2000, Steve Price wrote:
> It didn't help here. I rebuilt the port and re-installed from
> a clean WRKDIR and I get the same error message. If I do a
> 'make certificate', copy those files over, and try to start
> apache it just hangs definitely until I ^C it. After I kill
> it I
On Fri, 5 May 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote:
# How long ago was the previous port built?
>From the best I can remember it was sometime early to middle of
March.
# Do you still have the openssl
# port installed, if it was built against that?
Nope.
-steve
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROT
On Fri, 5 May 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote:
# I'm suspecting it might be something missing in the ASN.1 encoding of the
# certificate, which netscape requires but IE permits. This would be
# consistent with a missing openssl.cnf file at the time of certificate
# generation. Could one of you try copy
On Fri, 5 May 2000, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> Okay, I just did, using MS Explorer 5 and it worked with no problems.
> So, this is related to Netscape-4.72. But is it a bug on their part,
> or something else?
I'm suspecting it might be something missing in the ASN.1 encoding of the
certificate, w
Duh :) It didn't occur to me to try another browser:
Okay, I just did, using MS Explorer 5 and it worked with no problems.
So, this is related to Netscape-4.72. But is it a bug on their part,
or something else?
Forrest
On Fri, May 05, 2000 at 10:49:04PM -0500, Steve Price wrote:
> On Fri, 5
On Fri, 5 May 2000, Steve Price wrote:
> Nope. I generated the key with 'make certificate' on the
> apache13-php4 port. Here's what openssl says about the key.
>
> % openssl rsa -noout -text -in server.key | grep bit
> Private-Key: (1024 bit)
> %
It sounds like somehting is broken with the c
On Fri, 5 May 2000, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
# FWIW, I've had a weird (perhaps related) problem, only in the
# reverse. After creating a certificate (ie: 'make certificate' in
# apache), I was unable to connect to the server from a Netscape
# 4.72 browser. It only told me there was a decryption
On Fri, 5 May 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote:
# #define RSAREF_F_RSAREF_BN2BIN 101
# #define RSAREF_R_LEN 0x0406
#
# RSARef can't handle keys > 1024 bits long. This is a design limitation
# which the license forbids us from fixing.
#
# Do
On Fri, 5 May 2000, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> I understand, from private correspondence, that OpenSSH will have
> SSH2 protocol support, thus allowing people to not use RSA. Can
> someone confirm as it applies to use on FreeBSD.
It's being developed in the current version of OpenSSH. I'll proba
I understand, from private correspondence, that OpenSSH will have
SSH2 protocol support, thus allowing people to not use RSA. Can
someone confirm as it applies to use on FreeBSD.
I personally find the RSARef licensing to be a sham, in the light
of everything else on the internet, an would rathe
FWIW, I've had a weird (perhaps related) problem, only in the
reverse. After creating a certificate (ie: 'make certificate' in
apache), I was unable to connect to the server from a Netscape
4.72 browser. It only told me there was a decryption error in the
apache logs.
?
On Fri, May 05, 2000
On Fri, 5 May 2000, Steve Price wrote:
> [Fri May 5 20:46:19 2000] [error] OpenSSL: error:1E06D401:RSAref
> routines:func(109) :reason(1025)
You can interpret these error codes by looking up the defines in
- for example, these two are:
#define RSAREF_F_RSA_REF_PRIVATE_DECRYPT 1
Is anyone else noticing the following problems on their
-current boxen? I first noticed when my apache webserver
quit allowing secure connections with errors like this.
[Fri May 5 20:46:19 2000] [error] mod_ssl: SSL handshake failed (server
new.host.name:443, client 127.0.0.1) (OpenSSL library
Here is something I don't understand:
$ sh -c '/usr/bin/time ./a.out'
2.40 real 2.38 user 0.01 sys
$ /usr/bin/time ./a.out
7.19 real 7.19 user 0.00 sys
The same program is 3 times slower in the second case. The effect is
systematic but depends o
On Fri, May 05, 2000 at 02:29:01PM -0400, Donn Miller wrote:
>
> On Fri, 5 May 2000, Sergey Osokin wrote:
>
> > Hello!
> > After cvsuped my 5.0-CURRENT (FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Mon May 1 02:25:08 MSD 2000)
> > i try to buildworld...
> >
> > # make -DNOCLEAN -j6 buildworld
> >
> > ===> lib
On Fri, 5 May 2000, Sergey Osokin wrote:
> Hello!
> After cvsuped my 5.0-CURRENT (FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Mon May 1 02:25:08 MSD 2000)
> i try to buildworld...
>
> # make -DNOCLEAN -j6 buildworld
>
> ===> librsausa
> mkdir: openssl: File exists
> cp /usr/src/secure/lib/librsausa/../libcry
Hello!
After cvsuped my 5.0-CURRENT (FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Mon May 1 02:25:08 MSD 2000)
i try to buildworld...
# make -DNOCLEAN -j6 buildworld
===> librsausa
mkdir: openssl: File exists
cp /usr/src/secure/lib/librsausa/../libcrypto/opensslconf-i386.h openssl/opensslconf.h
*** Error code 1
Already fixed.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Lucas writes:
>Anyone else, or am I special?
>
>===> usr.bin/systat
>cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/usr.bin/systat/../../sys -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include
>-c /usr/src/usr.bin/systat/iostat.c
>In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/systat/i
Anyone else, or am I special?
==ml
===> usr.bin/systat
cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/usr.bin/systat/../../sys -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include
-c /usr/src/usr.bin/systat/cmds.c
cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/usr.bin/systat/../../sys -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include
-c /usr/src/usr.bin/systat/cmdtab
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Gary Jennejohn
had to walk into mine and say:
[...]
> Yes, this patch fixes the problem. Thank you, Bill Paul !
*sigh* It figures. Ok, I applied the patch to -current and -stable.
We now return you to your regularly scheduled program. P
You seem to have put in some hard work there. Yes, your analysis is
correct. the problem has been corrected not so long ago, albeit in a
slightly different way.
As it is now the ppi bus does not attach if the bus is polled mode. But
you are saying it works in polled mode as well.
I've attached
No, could you add
options DDB
makeoptions DEBUG=-g
to your kernel config and compile again? And reboot?
When the kernel panics it will end up in the kernel debugger. When that
happens, please write down the function names it comes up with.
if there is a function ca
Arg. What I really wanted to say was:
When it drops into the debugger, type 'trace' without quotes.
*sigh*
/me wanders off in search for a brain
On Fri, 5 May 2000, Nick Hibma wrote:
>
> No, could you add
>
> options DDB
> makeoptions DEBUG=-g
>
> to your kernel con
Bill Paul writes:
>Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Gary Jennejohn
>had to walk into mine and say:
>
>> OK. Unfortunately, gdb core dumps when I try to analyze a crash dump
>> with a debugging kernel :( Even worse, gdb core dumps when I try to
>> run a debugging gdb in gdb
26 matches
Mail list logo
