> Compiling Mozilla with make -j 2 got -current to lock up, twice in
> succession. I'm running a fairly recent snapshot (a week or two old)
> on a Dual celeron box (BP6) with UDMA66 enabled.
>
> The kernel had DDB enabled. I was running X, but I didn't see any
> signs of the kernel attempting to
Now that I've committed a change which fixes that pesky
lstat() panic in fdesc, I'd like to suggest that it replace the
existing /dev/fd devices and /dev/std{err,in,out}. I've already
got such a setup running on a test box:
Filesystem 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
Donn Miller wrote:
>
> It's probably more of a "placebo effect", which makes you think your
> are getting a big boost in performance. I'll admit that I've never
> seen a whole order or magnitude increase in performance between -O and
> -mpentium-O3, or whatever - it probably gives you boosts here
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 12:39:05PM +0900, Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote:
>
> >After a cvsup today, building a kernel finishes with this:
> >
> >linking kernel.debug
> >psm.o: In function `psmprobe':
> >/sys/compile/RJK191/../../isa/psm.c(.text+0x9fe): undefined
> >reference to `atkbdc
> >_open'
> >*** Er
On Sat, 18 Mar 2000, Alan Clegg wrote:
> Panasonic CD-ROM Changer that is found in by the kernel as:
>
> acd0-4: CDROM with 5 CD changer at ata0-master using PIO4
>
> Mounting /cdrom1 works just fine:
>
> /dev/acd0c on /cdrom1 (cd9660, local, read-only, reads: sync 5 async 0)
>
> But, attemp
Panasonic CD-ROM Changer that is found in by the kernel as:
acd0-4: CDROM with 5 CD changer at ata0-master using PIO4
In fstab, I have the following:
/dev/acd0c /cdrom1 cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0
/dev/acd1c /cdrom2 cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0
/dev/acd2c
>After a cvsup today, building a kernel finishes with this:
>
>linking kernel.debug
>psm.o: In function `psmprobe':
>/sys/compile/RJK191/../../isa/psm.c(.text+0x9fe): undefined
>reference to `atkbdc
>_open'
>*** Error code 1
>
>I know psm.c was changed today, I'd suppose one reference here was
>m
Idea Receiver wrote:
>
> Finally! IT WORKS!
Someone should let the XFree86 team know about this.
> On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, ANAZAWA Akio wrote:
> > bash$ diff -U2 FreeBSD.cf.orig FreeBSD.cf
> > --- FreeBSD.cf.orig Fri Feb 18 02:19:43 2000
> > +++ FreeBSD.cfSun Mar 19 00:27:11 2000
> > @
>linking kernel.debug
>psm.o: In function `psmprobe':
>/sys/compile/RJK191/../../isa/psm.c(.text+0x9fe): undefined
>reference to `atkbdc
>_open'
>*** Error code 1
>
>I know psm.c was changed today, I'd suppose one reference here was
>missed in the process. Just figured I'd be the first to say so.
Finally! IT WORKS!
:-)
On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, ANAZAWA Akio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > at Thu, 16 Mar 2000 14:41:53 +1000 (EST),
> > Idea Receiver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> IR> "make all" success without any problem.
> IR> however, make install fail ;(
* Arindum Mukerji ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000318 16:47]:
>
> I don't see an atkbdc_open() in the source tree. Perhaps this
> should be changed back to
> sc->addr = port;
> sc->kdbc = kbdc_open(sc->addr);
>
> Until someone commits an equivalent atkbdc_open() ?
>
My apologies for repl
* Ray Kohler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000318 15:35]:
> After a cvsup today, building a kernel finishes with this:
>
> linking kernel.debug
> psm.o: In function `psmprobe':
> /sys/compile/RJK191/../../isa/psm.c(.text+0x9fe): undefined
> reference to `atkbdc
> _open'
> *** Error code 1
I don't see an
> > Idea Receiver wrote:
> > >
> > > "make all" success without any problem.
> > > however, make install fail ;(
> > >
> > > following are the error msg.
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > xf86vmode.c: In function `ProcXF86VidModeGetMonitor':
> > > xf86vmode.c:1320: Unable to generate reloads for:
> > >
After a cvsup today, building a kernel finishes with this:
linking kernel.debug
psm.o: In function `psmprobe':
/sys/compile/RJK191/../../isa/psm.c(.text+0x9fe): undefined
reference to `atkbdc
_open'
*** Error code 1
I know psm.c was changed today, I'd suppose one reference here was
missed in the
David O'Brien wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2000 at 03:18:45AM +0100, Thomas Köllmann wrote:
> > If it doesn't I'll probably try `-03 -pipe -march=pentium' come next
>
> What are people hoping to get by doing this? Are you actually doing a
> scientific performance evaluation between the various o
On Sat, 18 Mar 2000, Howard Leadmon wrote:
> FYI, I tried both of the above, but still no solution. In fact I took a
> fresh machine, loaded the last RC from 0307 to give me a pure
> test bed in comparison to my other machines, and then did the
> cvsup and buildworld and now that box is also
>On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
>> One thing to check would be: did your installworld acutally
>> complete? At one point the installworld was falling over in h2ph
>> when a crypto-related header file was being perl'ified. If this is
>> your problem, try doing a 'make -i installw
< said:
> When the program is run, if you ping the IP address from the
> local machine, it sees packets. However, if you ping it from
> a remote machine, it doesn't see packets.
The ICMP never passes certain packets up to raw listeners. These
include ECHO REQUEST, TIMESTAMP REQUEST, and SUBNET
Steve Price wrote:
> On -current at least you can set the following sysctl knobs. Beware!
> No telling what might break if you do this, so you're on your own if
> you change them and weird things start happening with your other
> Linux apps.
>
> $ sysctl -a | grep linux
> compat.linux.osname: L
On Sat, Mar 18, 2000 at 03:18:45AM +0100, Thomas Köllmann wrote:
> | Perhaps this is a bit off topic, but can the pentium optimisations be used
> | for AMD K6 processors?
>
> I did a `make world' yesterday with
> CFLAGS= -O2 -pipe -march=pentium
> COPTFLAGS= -O2 -pip
I installed 4.0 on a notebook yesterday, using the docking station. As
previously described, I had hardware probing problems without using the
ethernet card in the docking station. Well, sadly, X11 requires an extra
option or two to work when with the docking station, but I figured that
out and
Hi,
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> at Thu, 16 Mar 2000 14:41:53 +1000 (EST),
> Idea Receiver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IR> "make all" success without any problem.
IR> however, make install fail ;(
IR> following are the error msg.
IR> anyway I can fix this problem?
IR> thx~
Thi
Thomas Köllmann wrote:
> I wrote/schrieb (Saturday, March 18, 2000):
>
> | R Joseph Wright wrote/schrieb (Friday, March 17, 2000):
> |
> | | > In contrast, I've been using -Os -march=pentium during the last three
> | | > months for buildworld and the kernel. Never had problems whatsoever.
> | |
>
I wrote/schrieb (Saturday, March 18, 2000):
| R Joseph Wright wrote/schrieb (Friday, March 17, 2000):
|
| | > In contrast, I've been using -Os -march=pentium during the last three
| | > months for buildworld and the kernel. Never had problems whatsoever.
| |
| | Perhaps this is a bit off topic,
On Mar 17, 6:27pm, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
} Subject: Re: kern/8324
} * Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000317 17:55] wrote:
} > This bug has been around since at least 2.2.6 and is still present
} > in RELENG_3, RELENG_4, and -current.
} >
} > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=8324
Hi!
The Konqueror built from sources of yesterday dies while trying to show
WWW pages. I'm using FreeBSD 5.0-current now, but the problem was same
about two weeks ago with 4.0-current. I tried to discuss the problem in
freebsd-current mailing list, but almost no feedback so far.
kio (KIOConnecti
26 matches
Mail list logo
