> Hi all,
>
> Is there a howto/example guide for configuring IPSec for -current.
Hi, I prepared one and sent the patches to freebsd-doc yesterday.
I'll attach IPsec part from the document to end of this mail.
Also,
http://www.kame.net/newsletter/19991007/
might have better description about I
For all of you seeing problems with eg. the if_xl module's dependancies
on the miibus module, this should be the cure.
--- Forwarded Message
Return-Path: msmith
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from hub.freebsd.org
by localhost with POP3 (fet
Hi all,
Is there a howto/example guide for configuring IPSec for -current.
Needless to say I've spent fruitless hours trying to convince "setkey"
to sent an IPSec packet to my network's internet gateway w/o success.
My setup is typical: mobile/dynamic-assigned-ip-address freebsd box
trying to c
> Tried to install the snapshot, but it hangs at Probing devices.
> ALT-F2 shows as last entry:
>
> DEBUG: Found a disk device named mlxd0
>
> Verbose boot seems not to show more. System is still active, ALT-CONTROL-DEL
> will ask if you really want to stop the install.
>
> System is an AMD K7-
At 04:33 PM 2/24/00 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote:
>
>> So when is this event scheduled to end, so we can go for a test drive?
>>
>> 57^H^H61 commits to -current and counting...
>
>The last message to show up in the series said Mark was finished and ab
Well that does't seem to work for me. Becase mergemaster doesn't use
NOCRYPT stuff and /usr/src/crypto doesn't exist by default, if you
just cvsup (or use CTM for my case).
I think checking for crypto is just simple.
Munehiro (Haro) Matsuda
From: Jim Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 24 Fe
On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 08:31:30PM -0800, Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
> Tried to install the snapshot, but it hangs at Probing devices.
> ALT-F2 shows as last entry:
>
> DEBUG: Found a disk device named mlxd0
>
> Verbose boot seems not to show more. System is still active, ALT-CONTROL-DEL
> will ask i
hi, there!
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:31:01PM +0100, Martin Cracauer wrote:
> > Where's the bug, anyway? Do we need to fix the compiler or would it be
> > better to get a newer assembler?
>
> A new assembler (whole binutils) is on the way, probably ar
auth ceff744c subscribe freebsd-current [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> I agree but the wording is a bit weird. Maybe it should read:
> "Do you want to enable anon ftp?" but if they just hit return it
> defaults to no.
There's no way to make a libdialog yes/no requestor "default to no" or
I'd have done exactly that. C'mon, give me at least minimum credit
for havin
While I was working on this project before I found out that Mark was 95%
done already, I made those tests be:
.in !defined(NO_OPENSSH) && !defined(NOCRYPT)
NOCRYPT has been the standard way of indicating that the cryptograph
package has not been installed.
Jim Bloom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M
On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 08:29:01PM -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> > I just did an install of the Feb 22 snap. The new wording for the anon
> > ftp section is really screwy. It's been turned around. The old straight
> > forward "Do you want to enable anon ftp?" was fine.
>
> It's been turned ar
Hi all,
I don't have crypto in my source tree, because I'm in Japan,
I get following error using mergemaster.
--8<-8<-Cut here-8<-8<-
# mergemaster
install: /usr/src/etc/../crypto/openssh/ssh_config: No such file or directory
***
At 07:51 PM 2/24/2000 -0800, Bill Swingle wrote:
>I just did an install of the Feb 22 snap. The new wording for the anon
>ftp section is really screwy. It's been turned around. The old straight
>forward "Do you want to enable anon ftp?" was fine.
>
>Hrmm.
OK, I am embarrassed now :-) I cant beli
Tried to install the snapshot, but it hangs at Probing devices.
ALT-F2 shows as last entry:
DEBUG: Found a disk device named mlxd0
Verbose boot seems not to show more. System is still active, ALT-CONTROL-DEL
will ask if you really want to stop the install.
System is an AMD K7-750, 256MB memory,
> I just did an install of the Feb 22 snap. The new wording for the anon
> ftp section is really screwy. It's been turned around. The old straight
> forward "Do you want to enable anon ftp?" was fine.
It's been turned around because people usually just hit return without
reading the dialogs and I
I just did an install of the Feb 22 snap. The new wording for the anon
ftp section is really screwy. It's been turned around. The old straight
forward "Do you want to enable anon ftp?" was fine.
Hrmm.
-Bill
On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 08:57:11PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
> The first time I thoug
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Mike Smith wrote:
> > > I'd hazard a guess that the presence of modules is causing the kernel
> > > linker to run and pull all the sysctl hooks for modules it's finding.
> > > I'm probably wrong, just a guess.
> ...
> > I'll go look up cold usage, and see if it necessarily
- Original Message -
From: "urania" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2000 10:05 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with IBM Netfinity 5000 Server
> Thanks you all,
> I do know gcc do nothing more as optimization levels large than
>Donn Miller wrote:
> I looked at the code for gcc a while back, and it looks like optimization
> levels of 3 and above are considered 3. So, -O6 is the same as -O3. I
> think gcc a long time ago had flags that went this high. I think pgcc
> uses -O6, though.
>
> Sometimes when using flags -
> > I'd hazard a guess that the presence of modules is causing the kernel
> > linker to run and pull all the sysctl hooks for modules it's finding.
> > I'm probably wrong, just a guess.
...
> I'll go look up cold usage, and see if it necessarily has to be done that
> early. I'll also investiga
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:27:31PM +0800, User URANIA wrote:
> > I also set these flags at my /etc/make.conf
> > CFLAGS= -mpentiumpro -O6 -pipe -funroll-loops -fexpensive-optimizations
> > COPTFLAGS= -mpentiumpro -O6 -pipe -funroll-loops
>
> -O6 (a
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Mike Smith wrote:
> > It seems Mike Smith wrote:
> > > That's possible; it may be that the kernel linker is calling something
> > > before you expect it to be called.
> >
> > Well, its rather that the delayed probe rutine I register with
> > config_intrhook_establish() is
The first time I thought I made a typo, but the second time through it
happened again. It seems that even if you choose NO to setup anon FTP, it
still gets setup. Anyone else notice this ? This was through the standard
installation.
---Mike
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PR
> "Matthew" == Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matthew> Please try the following patch and tell me if the crashes
Matthew> still occur. If this fixes the problem then I'm homing in on
Matthew> the bug.
Matthew> I am beginning to suspect that there is a case where a
Matthe
At 03:22 PM 2/24/2000 -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
> > megaraid: v107 (December 22, 1999)
> > megaraid: found 0x8086:0x1960:idx 0:bus 0:slot 10:func 1
> > scsi1 : Found a MegaRAID controller at 0xd0002000, IRQ: 12
> > megaraid: [GH6D:1.43] detected 1 logical drives
> > scsi0 : Adaptec AHA274x/284x/294
I can reliably reproduce this problem with the following lines in
/boot/loader.conf.local
splash_bmp_load="YES"
bitmap_name="/boot/earth.bmp"
bitmap_load="YES"
I have the same VESA and splash screen options in my kernel now
(sources cvsup'ed yesterday) that I did on the system pr
:This would explain why messing with the pmap_remove_all() case does
:not do what we expect -- I suspect that routine is not being called
:at all in certain cases.
:
:I have not found the case where the pmap gets cleared without being
:flushed yet but when I force the flush in
Please try the following patch and tell me if the crashes still occur.
If this fixes the problem then I'm homing in on the bug.
I am beginning to suspect that there is a case where a pmap can get
cleared without the tlb being flushed, causing origpte to be 0 when the
new pte i
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote:
> So when is this event scheduled to end, so we can go for a test drive?
>
> 57^H^H61 commits to -current and counting...
The last message to show up in the series said Mark was finished and about
to collapse unconscious, so I guess that means "let
At 12:58 AM 2/25/00 +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
>Gimme a break, I'm getting there! :-)
So when is this event scheduled to end, so we can go for a test drive?
57^H^H61 commits to -current and counting...
Jeff Mountin - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems/Network Administrator
FreeBSD - the power to serve
Does anyone know how to allow 3.4 or 4.0 to read
the memory on the riser board. The Compaq smart start reads it and it
shows up when the system boots. It knows the riser board is there, because
the CPU is on it
Scott
Ok, I've reproduced the crash. It isn't running out of KVM.
I suspect there is a bug in kmem_malloc() or kmem_free(), or
possibly kmem_malloc() of a previously freed space.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
> No, it is not. It is 100Mbps upstream and 100Mbps downstream. You cannot get
> 200Mbps in one direction. FDX (Full Duplex) simply means that the RX and TX
> cables are used simultaneous. Due to the small ethernet frame size, it is
> next to impossible to get the full speed for data transmission.
At 02:51 PM 2/24/00 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:27:31PM +0800, User URANIA wrote:
>> I also set these flags at my /etc/make.conf
>> CFLAGS= -mpentiumpro -O6 -pipe -funroll-loops -fexpensive-optimizations
>> COPTFLAGS= -mpentiumpro -O6 -pipe -funroll-loops
>
>-O6 (an
> Ok ... we all know what exactly should be theoretical maximum and all ...
> but that wasn't exactly my question ... I have having weird problems with
> the network performance permanently dropping to below 100 kB/s (while still
> in 100 Mbps/FDX). Is there anybody that could give a plausible exp
> megaraid: v107 (December 22, 1999)
> megaraid: found 0x8086:0x1960:idx 0:bus 0:slot 10:func 1
> scsi1 : Found a MegaRAID controller at 0xd0002000, IRQ: 12
> megaraid: [GH6D:1.43] detected 1 logical drives
> scsi0 : Adaptec AHA274x/284x/294x (EISA/VLB/PCI-Fast SCSI) 5.1.25/3.2.4
>
> scsi1
> It seems Mike Smith wrote:
> > That's possible; it may be that the kernel linker is calling something
> > before you expect it to be called.
>
> Well, its rather that the delayed probe rutine I register with
> config_intrhook_establish() is called before interrupts are actually
> working, tha
On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 09:03:55AM +, Doug Rabson wrote:
[snip]
> Nick Hibma's machine at work shows this problem. Its an AMD Athlon FWIW.
> Nick spent a couple of hours looking at it without much success. I'll try
> some things today to see if the probe is being called with interrupts
> di
Gimme a break, I'm getting there! :-)
M
>
> --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 09:34:36PM +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
> > markm 2000/02/24 21:34:35 SAST
> > IP libdes. All hail libcrypto!
>
> With -current (cvsuped from cvsup.free
There's something fishy going on here. I have a feeling that the
issue may be related to the reallocation fragmentation -- we might
be running the system out of KVM and there are *NO* NULL checks
in the file descriptor allocation code.
I'm trying to instrument the code and du
On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:27:31PM +0800, User URANIA wrote:
> I also set these flags at my /etc/make.conf
> CFLAGS= -mpentiumpro -O6 -pipe -funroll-loops -fexpensive-optimizations
> COPTFLAGS= -mpentiumpro -O6 -pipe -funroll-loops
-O6 (any -O above 3) is nonsense with the base GCC compiler.
On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 09:34:36PM +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
> markm 2000/02/24 21:34:35 SAST
> IP libdes. All hail libcrypto!
With -current (cvsuped from cvsup.freebsd.org/cvsup.internat.freebsd.org) as
of right now (23:40 +0100):
>>> stage 4: populating /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include
Hi Bruce,
it's running now. I removed every slice and started over.
I randomly choosed another size for the WIn98 slice (~6GB)
installed after that FreeBSD and now I don't get that messages
anymore. Maybe fdisk was the culprit ... have no other explanation.
Thanks for your help and patience
At 01:59 PM 2/24/00 -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>* Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000224 13:45] wrote:
>> I'm guessing this is related to jkh's mention of OpenSSH coming into
>> the tree, but I'm posting it anyway. Just in case it helps. my cvsup is
>> less then 4 hours old.
>>
>> ===>
On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 02:07:40PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
> Assuming you mean ``100BASE-T (half duplex)'' here... This is not
> quite right. In a CSMA/CD medium access protocol, like that used by
> Ethernet, the actual capacity of the link is always(*) somewhat less than
> 100%;
* Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000224 13:45] wrote:
> I'm guessing this is related to jkh's mention of OpenSSH coming into
> the tree, but I'm posting it anyway. Just in case it helps. my cvsup is
> less then 4 hours old.
>
> ===> libssl
> rm -f .depend
> mkdep -f .depend -a-DTERMIOS
Yes it is. strlcat and strlcpy are not needed in libssh since they are
in the libc already. They existed in the port because earlier version
of 3.x did not have them.
Mark is in the middle of committing all of the changes. It might be a
little while until everything is clean again.
Jim Bloom
I'm guessing this is related to jkh's mention of OpenSSH coming into
the tree, but I'm posting it anyway. Just in case it helps. my cvsup is
less then 4 hours old.
===> libssl
rm -f .depend
mkdep -f .depend -a-DTERMIOS -DANSI_SOURCE -DNO_IDEA -
I/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../crypto/
:> :MAXALLOCSAVE = 2 pages) when there is a lot of fork() activity.
:
:> Ahh. I presume you will commit this patch now that Bjoern has
:> confirmed that it works?
:
:Not until the reason that it works is understood.
:
:> I don't know why an unconditional invltlb() didn't work either,
On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Matthew Dillon wrote:
[I wrote]
> :See PR 16568. pmap_remove_all() doesn't flush the TLB properly in
> :FreeBSD-3.x on i386's. Somehow this doesn't cause many problems, but
> :it fairly reliably breaks the free() in fdfree() when there was a file
> :descriptor larger than a
It seems Mike Smith wrote:
> >
> > That megapatch was only newbus patches and cosmetics around that, one
> > new item was cmd646 support but that is hardly the problem here.
>
> You didn't mention the 0xa5 test, and I forgot to tell you that I backed
> it out as well (no change).
yeah, cosmeti
On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 07:48:35PM +0100, Dieter Rothacker wrote:
> No, it is not. It is 100Mbps upstream and 100Mbps downstream. You cannot get
> 200Mbps in one direction. FDX (Full Duplex) simply means that the RX and TX
> cables are used simultaneous. Due to the small ethernet frame size, it is
< said:
> The theoretical maximum for 100BaseT-FDX (which is 200Mbps) is 25MB/s
> (megabytes per second), 100BaseT-TX is 12MB/s [FYI: Mbps->MB/s you divide
> by 8] I realize my punctuation may be off, but there you are.
Assuming you mean ``100BASE-T (half duplex)'' here... This is not
quite rig
On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:31:01PM +0100, Martin Cracauer wrote:
> Where's the bug, anyway? Do we need to fix the compiler or would it be
> better to get a newer assembler?
A new assembler (whole binutils) is on the way, probably around the end
of March.
--
-- David([EMAIL PROTECTED])
To
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000 10:21:31 -0700, Chris Wasser wrote:
>> Downloading an 128 MB-file from the network to /dev/null results in speeds
>> like 9.8 MB/s (close to the theoretical maximum for a 100 Mbps network)
>
>The theoretical maximum for 100BaseT-FDX (which is 200Mbps) is 25MB/s
>(megabytes per
At 11:37 PM -0800 2/23/00, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>Since it came down to making openssl actually useful for something or
>taking it out of the tree, we accelerated progress somewhat on the
>openssh integration work.
Sounds like a good idea.
>I will also be delaying -current's release date unti
On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> But this didn't solve the crash at exit. But...
> rm -rf /usr/lib/compat/*
> cd /usr/src/lib/compat/compat22/
> make all install clean
> cd ../compat3x.i386/
> make all install clean
> solved this for me (YMMV).
After doing this, I notic
> It seems Mike Smith wrote:
> > > Forgive me if I'm beating a dead horse... I'm still having the following
> > > problem if I load any modules from /boot/loader.conf:
> >
> > I've reproduced this here, and narrowed it down to Soren's ATA megacommit
> > on the 18th. Unfortunately, the newbus pa
Don't forget protocol overhead.
Chris Wasser wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 12:04:38PM +0100, Pascal Hofstee wrote:
> > media: autoselect (100baseTX )
> >
> > Downloading an 128 MB-file from the network to /dev/null results in speeds
> > like 9.8 MB/s (close to the theoretical maximum fo
On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 12:04:38PM +0100, Pascal Hofstee wrote:
> media: autoselect (100baseTX )
>
> Downloading an 128 MB-file from the network to /dev/null results in speeds
> like 9.8 MB/s (close to the theoretical maximum for a 100 Mbps network)
The theoretical maximum for 100BaseT-FDX
Soren Schmidt wrote:
>
> It seems Mike Smith wrote:
> > > Forgive me if I'm beating a dead horse... I'm still having the following
> > > problem if I load any modules from /boot/loader.conf:
> >
> > I've reproduced this here, and narrowed it down to Soren's ATA megacommit
> > on the 18th. Unfort
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, O. Hartmann wrote:
> I cvsup'd this morning the sources, the original installed
> system was 4.0-2214. Built a new kernel, installed it, rebooted -
> locked out? Huh ... root's password won't run anymore and I have no
> glue why ...
You were using DES crypt libraries but
> Is it possible to get the RC2 iso via http?? The reason I ask is that the
> firewall here blocks ftp.
>
> PS...Please email directly as this address is not on the mailing list
>
> Thank you,
>
> William
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in th
At 12:26 AM 2/24/00 -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
>> OK, on the PERC2/SC and LINUX with the firmware from Dell (3.00), it pukes
>> with Redhat LINUX. I am able to talk to the card, fdisk and newfs it, but
>> it crashes hard when you write to the partition. I am going to try and
>> reflash the card
On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 04:13:34AM -0800, arnee wrote:
> sorry, i'm suppose to post this under freebsd-questions. this should teach
> me posting early in the morning :-)
>
> To continue the questions... if the sample ipfw rule "deny all from any to
> 192.168.0.0/16 via outside_interfaces" doesn't
At 12:26 AM 2/24/2000 -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
> > OK, on the PERC2/SC and LINUX with the firmware from Dell (3.00), it pukes
> > with Redhat LINUX. I am able to talk to the card, fdisk and newfs it, but
> > it crashes hard when you write to the partition. I am going to try and
> > reflash the c
I'm also
experiencing this under current since the Mega Patch, I'm running on Celeron
500. Asus P99B Board (2 IDE, 128MB Ram, 4.3 GB Hard Disk). But if I don't load
any modules, it works fine.
I cvsup'd this morning the sources, the original installed
system was 4.0-2214. Built a new kernel, installed it, rebooted -
locked out? Huh ... root's password won't run anymore and I have no
glue why ...
Gruss O. Hartmann
---
[
sorry, i'm suppose to post this under freebsd-questions. this should teach
me posting early in the morning :-)
To continue the questions... if the sample ipfw rule "deny all from any to
192.168.0.0/16 via outside_interfaces" doesn't always work. Should it be
included in the rc.firewall example?
Hello,
I am experiencing some weird problems with the dc-driver for a specific
ethernet-card ... the Compex Freedomline (10/100 Mbps).
The card perfectly seems to autodetect the mode it should operate on and
seems to indeed be working just fine just after the system has booted up.
--[dmesg]
I have been wondering what the right answer to this scenario is. Here is
the scenario:
machine A -- outside ip (internet)
machine B -- router, natd, registered ip and set to stop RFC1918 on the
public interface
machine C -- inside LAN, unregisterd ip 192.168.0.0/16
When I connect to machine A fr
On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:27:31PM +0800, User URANIA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've a Netfinity 5000 Server, internal 5 PCI slot onborad.
> If i put one Intel 82558 NIC at 5th PCI Slot, everythings goes
> fine. Every times i put the same Intel NIC to any other PCI
> slots ( 1th ~ 4th ), a
On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Kevin Day wrote:
> >
> > That's odd... I just built it tonight, and I havn't had anything but this:
> >
> > XFree86-Bigfont extension: shmat() failed, size = 4096, errno = 24
> > XFree86-Bigfont extension: shmat() failed, size = 4096, errno = 24
> > XFree86-Bigfont extensio
It seems Doug Rabson wrote:
> >
> > That megapatch was only newbus patches and cosmetics around that, one
> > new item was cmd646 support but that is hardly the problem here.
> >
> > > Soren - this is somewhat of a showstopper. Can you reproduce it there?
> >
> > Nope, I've tried several machi
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Mike Smith wrote:
> > > Forgive me if I'm beating a dead horse... I'm still having the following
> > > problem if I load any modules from /boot/loader.conf:
> >
> > I've reproduced this here, and narrowed it down to Soren's ATA megacommit
> >
On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 05:43:04AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > what do you mean exactly with "old systems" ?
> FreeBSD-3.x, or FreeBSD--current with the wd driver.
Oh, that you mean ... Well but I'm running a very up to date -current.
FreeBSD titan.klemm.gtn.com 4.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT
> Perhaps, but take a look at the installation... it sets it
> to USA_RESIDENT="YES" (note WITH quotes).
Fixed, whoops!
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
It seems Mike Smith wrote:
> > Forgive me if I'm beating a dead horse... I'm still having the following
> > problem if I load any modules from /boot/loader.conf:
>
> I've reproduced this here, and narrowed it down to Soren's ATA megacommit
> on the 18th. Unfortunately, the newbus patches (teste
> > > >Hmm. I did some testing, and I can lock both the G6HC and G6HD firmware
> > > >up within a few minutes. The Dell 3.00 firmware remains stable under the
> > > >same load (20 simultaneous 'bonnie -s 100's). I'm fairly sure it's a
> > > >firmware lockup - the SCSI bus is hung and usually th
Hi,
It seems that /usr/share/examples/kld/cdev example is broken for a long time,
which obviously not we want for 4.0-RELEASE. Could someone review my docs/16173
PR and commit it with corrections if it will be necessary (I'm really not very
prominent as a kld hacker)?
-Maxim
To Unsubscribe: s
> Forgive me if I'm beating a dead horse... I'm still having the following
> problem if I load any modules from /boot/loader.conf:
I've reproduced this here, and narrowed it down to Soren's ATA megacommit
on the 18th. Unfortunately, the newbus patches (tested) and the other
gunk (untested) end
82 matches
Mail list logo
