hi, there!
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, John Polstra wrote:
> Really?! Augh. Naturally this comes just hours after I have merged
> the latest changes into -stable *sigh*.
>
> Could you please make sure your src/libexec/rtld-elf is
> up-to-date? rtld.c should be at revision 1.41.
yes. my src/libexec
OK. I said I'd clean this up and send this out. Well, I didn't get
as much ceanup done as I'd have liked. The order of hosts is
arbitrary and works for me. I'm sure this could be improved,
especially to make the order random.
Warner
#!/bin/sh
if [ -z "$1" ]; then
hosts=" \
cvs
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Jason Evans wrote:
> I often do a 'make includes' to be able to iteratively test changes. Once
> I'm happy that the changes are sound, there is no way to assure that the
> changes didn't cause a bootstrapping problem like this one.
`make includes' breaks your test environme
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" writes:
: "load" on the mirror. Where "load" is either one of the connection
: slots, or actual kernel resource load if I have 20% packet loss and thus
: cause a lot of retransmissions to occur.
Hmmm. A thought just occurred to me. There's no need
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Jason Evans wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 10:11:57AM -0800, Bill Swingle wrote:
>...
> > cc -DPROF -DLIBC_RCS -DSYSLIBC_RCS -I/usr/src/lib/libc/include
>-D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -DINET6 -DPOSIX_MISTAKE -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/locale
>-DBROKEN_DES -DYP -I/usr/obj/usr/s
"Matt M." wrote:
> Just wondering what potential problems I am facing by going from
> 3.4-release to -current. I was told on irc that my chances may not be
> well.
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
I tried upgrading
> I try to install FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT snapshot on
> server with have mylex accele raid 250 controler.
> FreeBSD installs on it without any problems, but
> can't boot from it. I try 2 and 8 GB BIOS mode,
> also FreeBSD and BIOS geometry (trick with small
> dos partition). Depending of situati
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 08:56:29PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
> I guess it means, is the main component trying to be balanced the server
> resources or the network resources. I may be wrong, but I think that the
> server resources are more likely to be the most important bottleneck, and
Not reall
Amancio Hasty wrote:
>
> > > My only point is that the first response to a problem isn't to necessarily
> > > pull out emacs and start hacking away on code.
> >
> > Yea, it is easier to do in a regular zone file then to implement the
> > network measurement logic into cvsup.
>
> Yes, it is a rat
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, David O'Brien wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 07:03:51PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
> > > I don't know ... I think it might be a good idea for the cvsup client to
> > > make a connection to a cvsup master, get redirected from that master to
> > > the actual handler of t
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 07:03:51PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
> > I don't know ... I think it might be a good idea for the cvsup client to
> > make a connection to a cvsup master, get redirected from that master to
> > the actual handler of the connectio
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 07:27:08PM -0500, Will Andrews wrote:
> Traceroute works fine.
Traceroute can be annoying to use as it is much slower. And not all
routers respond "properly" to it.
> If you knew the history of fadeto.blackened.com, you'd know why ICMPs
> are filtered out
I really don'
> > > Hi David,
> > >
> > > John can implement a ping echo packet protocol for cvsup whose
> > > response can have "cool" information on the server. Steven's
> > > book on Networking already has the code for doing network latency
> > > calculations . It is more like if John has the time to implem
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 07:03:51PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
> I don't know ... I think it might be a good idea for the cvsup client to
> make a connection to a cvsup master, get redirected from that master to
> the actual handler of the connection, and then work. That way, a config
> file on the
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 07:02:10PM -0500, Will Andrews wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 03:33:19PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > What do you mean? JKH said there would be a Feature Freeze on Jan 15 and
> > it happened. What more did JKH need to say on the topic?
>
> I lost some mail from earl
> > Hi David,
> >
> > John can implement a ping echo packet protocol for cvsup whose
> > response can have "cool" information on the server. Steven's
> > book on Networking already has the code for doing network latency
> > calculations . It is more like if John has the time to implement
> > such
I have the same soundcard, and as of right now, the only problem I have
with it is that sometimes it will play static instead of the sound I
wanted it to play.
=
| Kenneth Culver | FreeBSD: The best OS around.|
| Un
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Will Andrews wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 03:33:19PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > What do you mean? JKH said there would be a Feature Freeze on Jan 15 and
> > it happened. What more did JKH need to say on the topic?
>
> I lost some mail from early this week, but I d
> Hi David,
>
> John can implement a ping echo packet protocol for cvsup whose
> response can have "cool" information on the server. Steven's
> book on Networking already has the code for doing network latency
> calculations . It is more like if John has the time to implement
> such scheme
Brian Somers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Unless there are objections in the next day or two, I'm going to
> deprecate the TUNSLMODE ioctl favour of TUNSIFHEAD. Where TUNSLMODE
> prepended a sockaddr to each packet, TUNSIFHEAD will instead prepend a
> 4-byte network-byte-order address family.
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, David O'Brien wrote:
> Possibly, being ping'able should be be a requirement to being a CVSup
> mirror.
I don't think it makes sense to try to dictate network policy to people
who are doing the FreeBSD Project a favor. Anyway, an application-level
round-trip time measurement
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 03:40:14PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> I have to agree with Amancio. Otherwise how are we to determine if
> cvsup8 is worth our time? I personally will not be switching to it until
> I can determine it is a better path for me.
>
> Possibly, being ping'able should be be
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 03:33:19PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> What do you mean? JKH said there would be a Feature Freeze on Jan 15 and
> it happened. What more did JKH need to say on the topic?
I lost some mail from early this week, but I didn't get anything from
Jordan saying the FF was in
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, David O'Brien wrote:
> I have to agree with Amancio. Otherwise how are we to determine if
> cvsup8 is worth our time? I personally will not be switching to it until
> I can determine it is a better path for me.
>
> Possibly, being ping'able should be be a requirement to be
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 04:47:42PM -0700, Wes Peters wrote:
> Perhaps an option to CVSup to test a group of servers and render a "rating"
> for each, or to choose a "best" one. Then an intelligent human being could
> use this information to occasionally change which cvsup server they use.
>
> Su
Hi David,
John can implement a ping echo packet protocol for cvsup whose
response can have "cool" information on the server. Steven's
book on Networking already has the code for doing network latency
calculations . It is more like if John has the time to implement
such scheme
--
Amanci
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 03:47:27PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 02:22:51PM -0800, Jason Evans wrote:
> >
> > I did a 'make includes' during my testing, so I didn't have this
> > problem.
> ...
> >
> > In any case, doing a 'make includes' will get you past this.
>
> But t
> > My only point is that the first response to a problem isn't to necessarily
> > pull out emacs and start hacking away on code.
>
> Yea, it is easier to do in a regular zone file then to implement the
> network measurement logic into cvsup.
Yes, it is a rather cool idea to rotate on the cvs se
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 02:22:51PM -0800, Jason Evans wrote:
>
> I did a 'make includes' during my testing, so I didn't have this
> problem.
...
>
> In any case, doing a 'make includes' will get you past this.
But this is not a very satisfiable bootstrap requirement.
We need to keep in mind that
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 05:33:53PM -0500, Will Andrews wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 04:14:47PM -0600, Mohit Aron wrote:
> > Hi,
> > wasn't the release date set for Jan 15 ? Anyone knows the new
> > tentative date ? Thanks,
>
> That was the Feature Freeze (tm). Jordan hasn't made any "off
: > Does it matter? Who cvsup's regulary more than once or twice a day?
: > Committers AFAIK do cvs directly.
: I "cvs co" from my local copy of the repository, which is kept
: up-to-date using cvsup.
When I'm making lots of commits, I'll do 10-20 cvsups in a day, but
usually it is more like 3-5
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 11:11:17AM -0800, John Polstra wrote:
> I have been reminded that a few mirrors (cvsup8 in particular) filter
> pings. Don't take ping failures as a certain indication that the
> server is down.
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 11:22:33AM -0800, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> So have the
Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > Jesper Skriver wrote:
> > >
> >
> > > You will risk hitting 2 different server in 2 rapid cvsup run's, where
> > > the first may be more up to date than the next, as Jordan wrote earlier
> > > in this thread ...
> >
> > Does it matter? Who cvsup's
Thought I'd post this to -current also since it gives a little more detail
(I hope). I can't believe I'm the only one experiencing this since it's
still around when I do a fresh install from a snapshot. Not a huge deal for
me since I can use Windows for audio, but I'd rather use FreeBSD again. I'm
On Sat, 22 Jan 2000, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Ah, well, ok. I used it extensively with bind 8.1.2 in an internal
> application in a big bank to get approx. load distribution with
> Windumb clients (they always take the first record in the list
> returned).
>
> Anyway, if multi CNAME is no good t
Louis A. Mamakos wrote:
>
> > > Second, a domain name can at most a single CNAME record associated
> > > with it, and other other record types. BIND will (should) barf on a
> > > zone file containing the example you listed.
> >
> > It does not. It will round-robin over the CNAME's.
>
> If it do
On 21-Jan-00 Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Jesper Skriver wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 11:06:40PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>> > I don't see any appearant reson (short of network connectivity) that
>> > one *needs* to get always the *same* server.
>>
>> This has been discussed regulary .
Matthew Hunt wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 11:56:11PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
> > OK, then you should hardwire your cvsup server to cvsup[1-8]. You can
> > master cvs so you can master this.
>
> I do. Thanks for your vote of confidence in my abilities, though.
> If you meant "comm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > Second, a domain name can at most a single CNAME record associated
> > > with it, and other other record types. BIND will (should) barf on a
> > > zone file containing the example you listed.
> >
> > It does not. It will round-robin over the CNAME's.
>
> See the
> > Second, a domain name can at most a single CNAME record associated
> > with it, and other other record types. BIND will (should) barf on a
> > zone file containing the example you listed.
>
> It does not. It will round-robin over the CNAME's.
If it does, than this is a bug in BIND. The DN
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 11:56:11PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> OK, then you should hardwire your cvsup server to cvsup[1-8]. You can
> master cvs so you can master this.
I do. Thanks for your vote of confidence in my abilities, though.
If you meant "committers use cvs directly or hardwire t
Matthew Hunt wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 11:39:24PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
> > Does it matter? Who cvsup's regulary more than once or twice a day?
> > Committers AFAIK do cvs directly.
>
> I "cvs co" from my local copy of the repository, which is kept
> up-to-date using cvsup.
Jesper Skriver wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 11:06:40PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > I don't see any appearant reson (short of network connectivity) that
> > one *needs* to get always the *same* server.
>
> This has been discussed regulary ...
Must have been some time ago...
> You wi
Some more information: I can not reproduce the problem with a -current as of
yesterday on my home system. I'll re-check my system at work next week and let
you know.
--
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/ "Reliability means never
_/ _/ _/ having
> > Second, a domain name can at most a single CNAME record associated
> > with it, and other other record types. BIND will (should) barf on a
> > zone file containing the example you listed.
>
> It does not. It will round-robin over the CNAME's.
See the documentation for the multiple-cnames op
Louis A. Mamakos wrote:
> > cvsup IN CNAMEcvsup1.freebsd.org.
> > cvsup IN CNAMEcvsup2.freebsd.org.
> > cvsup IN CNAMEcvsup3.freebsd.org.
> > cvsup IN CNAMEcvsup4.freebsd.org.
> > cvsup IN CNAMEcvsup5.freebsd.org.
> >
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 11:39:24PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Does it matter? Who cvsup's regulary more than once or twice a day?
> Committers AFAIK do cvs directly.
I "cvs co" from my local copy of the repository, which is kept
up-to-date using cvsup.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Jesper Skriver wrote:
> >
>
> > You will risk hitting 2 different server in 2 rapid cvsup run's, where
> > the first may be more up to date than the next, as Jordan wrote earlier
> > in this thread ...
>
> Does it matter? Who cvsup's regulary more than once or twice a d
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mohit Aron writes:
: wasn't the release date set for Jan 15 ? Anyone knows the new
: tentative date ? Thanks,
No. Jan 15 was a feature freeze. Likely first part of Feb for a
release, but no date has been widely circulated.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mai
Brad Knowles wrote:
>
> At 11:06 PM +0100 2000/1/21, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
> > Thats not so easy. What about this:
> >
> > cvsupIN CNAMEcvsup1.freebsd.org.
> > cvsupIN CNAMEcvsup2.freebsd.org.
> > cvsupIN CNAMEcvsup3.
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 04:14:47PM -0600, Mohit Aron wrote:
> Hi,
> wasn't the release date set for Jan 15 ? Anyone knows the new
> tentative date ? Thanks,
That was the Feature Freeze (tm). Jordan hasn't made any "official"
announcements about the Feature Freeze yet, I don't think.
Anywa
At 11:06 PM +0100 2000/1/21, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Thats not so easy. What about this:
>
> cvsupIN CNAMEcvsup1.freebsd.org.
> cvsupIN CNAMEcvsup2.freebsd.org.
> cvsupIN CNAMEcvsup3.freebsd.org.
> cvsup
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 10:11:57AM -0800, Bill Swingle wrote:
> I updated my source tree around 10pm PST last night (01/20) and made
> world only to find it broken this morning. I reupdated my tree just now
> and it doesnt look like any files that might fix this have been touched.
> Anyone else se
Hi,
wasn't the release date set for Jan 15 ? Anyone knows the new
tentative date ? Thanks,
- Mohit
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> > Maybe you should make cvsup.freebsd.org as a rotary (of sorts),
> > which returns a different IP address based on the callers IP
> > address. (or is that even possible?) That way, any given
> > host will always try the same cvsup server, but you'll be
> > spreading the load out among the se
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 04:24:41PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Warner Losh wrote:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Chuck Robey
>writes:
> > : I would think using a fixed order would be a really bad thing, causing
> > : overload of the first server in line. Did I misunderst
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 11:06:40PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> >
> > At 10:43 AM -0800 1/21/00, John Polstra wrote:
> > >This is another in my series of occasional nags to try to get people
> > >to use some of the less heavily loaded CVSup mirrors. In the US
> > >a
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>
> At 10:43 AM -0800 1/21/00, John Polstra wrote:
> >This is another in my series of occasional nags to try to get people
> >to use some of the less heavily loaded CVSup mirrors. In the US
> >alone, we have 8 mirror sites now, named (duh) cvsup[1-8].FreeBSD.org.
> >The
> A nice heuristic that attempts to minimize latency and maximize throughput
> would be a nice feature to have. For extra credit, reverse entropy as well.
>
> Seriously, attempting to connect to a list of servers using record route
> and minimizing the latency and/or hop count would be a great
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John Polstra writes:
> : > Can you make cvsup accept multiple servers to try in it's configuration
> : > file?
> :
> : I'll add that to the to-do list.
>
> I have a very crude script that does its own (fixed) round robin o
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Chuck Robey writes:
: I would think using a fixed order would be a really bad thing, causing
: overload of the first server in line. Did I misunderstand you? How about
: doing a script (say in perl, it has random numbers) that randomly picks
: the server from a lis
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Chuck Robey
>writes:
> : I would think using a fixed order would be a really bad thing, causing
> : overload of the first server in line. Did I misunderstand you? How about
> : doing a script (say in perl, it has random n
John Polstra wrote:
>
> > Can you make cvsup accept multiple servers to try in it's configuration
> > file?
>
> I'll add that to the to-do list.
A nice heuristic that attempts to minimize latency and maximize throughput
would be a nice feature to have. For extra credit, reverse entropy as well
At 9:42 PM +0100 1/21/00, Jesper Skriver wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 03:34:42PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> > At 10:43 AM -0800 1/21/00, John Polstra wrote:
> > >This is another in my series of occasional nags to try to get
> > >people to use some of the less heavily loaded CVSup mirrors
At 1:20 AM -0800 1/15/00, Soren Schmidt wrote:
>It seems Harold Gutch wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 14, 2000 at 09:29:58AM +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote:
>> > I have it on my TODO list, but I'm not started yet, and probably wont for
>> > some time to come.
>> > The reason I've put it on the backburner for n
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John Polstra writes:
: > Can you make cvsup accept multiple servers to try in it's configuration
: > file?
:
: I'll add that to the to-do list.
I have a very crude script that does its own (fixed) round robin of
multiple servers. It tries three times fast (yes, I
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 03:34:42PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> At 10:43 AM -0800 1/21/00, John Polstra wrote:
> >This is another in my series of occasional nags to try to get people
> >to use some of the less heavily loaded CVSup mirrors. In the US
> >alone, we have 8 mirror sites now, name
At 10:43 AM -0800 1/21/00, John Polstra wrote:
>This is another in my series of occasional nags to try to get people
>to use some of the less heavily loaded CVSup mirrors. In the US
>alone, we have 8 mirror sites now, named (duh) cvsup[1-8].FreeBSD.org.
>The newest, cvsup8, is a very high-capacit
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 05:15:36PM +0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 09:19:22AM +0200, John Hay wrote:
> [..]
> > > cp: /usr/src/release/texts/HARDWARE.TXT: No such file or directory
> > > *** Error code 1
> [..]
> > > It looks like the handling of HARDWARE.
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 09:19:22AM +0200, John Hay wrote:
> Stop in /usr/src/release.
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /usr/src/release.
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /usr/src/release.
> ---
>
> It looks like the handling of HARDWARE.TXT in release/Makefile is broken.
> Jordan, I believe this change should go into 4.0-RELEASE rather than
> happening afterwards so that we have a minimal number of people
> (hopefully none) using TUNSLMODE. TUNSLMODE was never MFC'd.
Do it. :)
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd
Unless there are objections in the next day or two, I'm going to
deprecate the TUNSLMODE ioctl favour of TUNSIFHEAD. Where TUNSLMODE
prepended a sockaddr to each packet, TUNSIFHEAD will instead prepend a
4-byte network-byte-order address family.
Jordan, I believe this change should go into 4.
Bill Paul wrote:
> Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, arnee had to walk
> into mine and say:
hehehhe... Oh no!! What did I walk into... a quicksand! :-)
> Ack...
> No, please...
> Stop, you're killing me...
> Aie!
>
> Oh for the love of *god*. Rip this thing out of you
> Can you make cvsup accept multiple servers to try in it's configuration
> file?
I'll add that to the to-do list.
John
--
John Polstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John D. Polstra & Co., Inc.Seattle, Washington USA
"Disappointmen
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Amancio Hasty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am fairly certain that Java + TYA worked before Jan 7 -- haven't
> upgraded my system since then.
Yes, that assert that failed wasn't in the dynamic linker on January
7. What I need to know is: did it start failing soo
So have the cvsup client do the pinging to the server and extract
its current work load or other vital statistic.
--
Amancio Hasty
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Amancio Hasty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If the user does specifiy a cvsup , can you decide for the user which
> server is best based upon some simple statistic?
Some day I hope it's possible, but there's nothing like that
implemented currently. Also there are
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, I wrote:
> To choose a mirror site, try pinging the mirrors in your country.
I have been reminded that a few mirrors (cvsup8 in particular) filter
pings. Don't take ping failures as a certain indication that the
server is down.
John
--
John Polstra
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 10:43:39AM -0800, John Polstra wrote:
>
> To choose a mirror site, try pinging the mirrors in your country.
> Pick one with a low packet loss rate. The round trip time doesn't
> matter very much as long as it doesn't undergo wild variations.
> Second, pick a site that's n
If the user does specifiy a cvsup , can you decide for the user which
server is best based upon some simple statistic?
--
Amancio Hasty
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
|From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 21 11:23:14 2000
|
|In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
|Russell L. Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> I've seen it with yesterdays current and libc_r threads, and it's intermittent.
|
|Did this problem just start, or has it been there for awhile? I
|haven't changed
This is another in my series of occasional nags to try to get people
to use some of the less heavily loaded CVSup mirrors. In the US
alone, we have 8 mirror sites now, named (duh) cvsup[1-8].FreeBSD.org.
The newest, cvsup8, is a very high-capacity and well-connected site,
yet hardly anybody is us
I am fairly certain that Java + TYA worked before Jan 7 -- haven't
upgraded my system since then.
--
Amancio Hasty
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Russell L. Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've seen it with yesterdays current and libc_r threads, and it's intermittent.
Did this problem just start, or has it been there for awhile? I
haven't changed the dynamic linker in -current since January 9, and
I'm w
$B"#"#(B $B7HBSEEOC(B $B:G?75!$N:G?75!\$7$/$O2<5-#U#R#L$K%"%/%;%9$7$F2<$5$$!#(B
http://cwj.to/link.cgi/ID=441/GO=linker/cwm/keitai_shop/gekiyasu/free.html
$B"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#(B
$BFMA3$N%a!<%k<:Ni$$$?$7$^$9!#$b$7!"A4$/6=L#$NL5$$Fb
I updated my source tree around 10pm PST last night (01/20) and made
world only to find it broken this morning. I reupdated my tree just now
and it doesnt look like any files that might fix this have been touched.
Anyone else seeing this?
cc -pg -O -pipe -DLIBC_RCS -DSYSLIBC_RCS -I/usr/src/lib/li
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Frank Mayhar writes:
: Now I'm looking forward to the newcard cardbus support so I can finally use
: the 575BT which came with the laptop. (Tapping fingers impatiently. :-)
Hope you are tapping something soft :-) Wouldn't want you to hurt
yourself, or have others
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Will Andrews writes:
: On Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 02:48:25AM -0800, Frank Mayhar wrote:
: > Interestingly, I rebuilt world with the latest pccardd changes and,
: > suddenly, the 589D started working perfectly. Unfortunately, the
: > 574BT doesn't work at all now. It a
I've seen it with yesterdays current and libc_r threads, and it's intermittent.
Russell
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Will Andrews writes:
> : On Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 02:48:25AM -0800, Frank Mayhar wrote:
> : > Interestingly, I rebuilt world with the latest pccardd changes and,
> : > suddenly, the 589D started working perfectly. Unfortunately, the
> : > 574BT d
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Max Khon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi, there!
>
> applet_viewer bombs out with a lot of stuff in the output like this
> (until killed -9):
>
> ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c:55
Really?! Augh. Naturally this comes just hours
This message was sent from Geocrawler.com by "Steven Jurczyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Be sure to reply to that address.
I try to install FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT snapshot on
server with have mylex accele raid 250 controler.
FreeBSD installs on it without any problems, but
can't boot from it. I try 2 an
i'm just reporting this, i have no real info, other than it happened.
i installed the 2114 snapshot. SUPed -current, uhm, two days ago i
think. did a make buildworld at that time. then yesterday evening i had
a chance to reboot my machine so i did make installworld (as well as a new
kernel
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Brian Hechinger wrote:
> rebooted, tried to log in and couldn't. not as root, not as my regular user.
Sounds like you clobbered your DES libcrypt libraries with non-DES ones,
and now you can't use your DES passwords.
Kris
"How many roads must a man walk down, before
Your userland is out of sync with your kernel. I suggest you tell us
what steps you took to get here. I'm referring to steps like:
- make world
- compile your kernel
- update /etc/fstab and the likes
- update /dev/MAKEDEV
and other things you could come up with t
On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 09:21:13PM -0800, Matt M. wrote:
> Just wondering what potential problems I am facing by going from
> 3.4-release to -current. I was told on irc that my chances may not be
> well.
You should read /usr/src/UPDATING (for -CURRENT). I won't say you shouldn't
use it since 4.0-
On Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 02:48:25AM -0800, Frank Mayhar wrote:
> Interestingly, I rebuilt world with the latest pccardd changes and,
> suddenly, the 589D started working perfectly. Unfortunately, the
> 574BT doesn't work at all now. It appears to configure properly, but
> it doesn't transmit or r
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 06:42:51PM +0600, Max Khon wrote:
> hi, there!
>
> applet_viewer bombs out with a lot of stuff in the output like this
> (until killed -9):
>
> ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c:55
> ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/lock
# mount -u -o rw /
mount: block device required
what is the problem? :(
thanks
-Mensaje original-
De: Nick Hibma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: joanra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fecha: viernes, 21 de enero de 2000 10:53
Asunto: RE: error wich devices ad*
Hi,
I've seen the following error for the last 2 days since the
make release change to HARDWARE.TXT.
CVS shows this file as removed from the head of the tree at
revision 1.30 but the Makefile is unconditionally attempting
to copy them in the ftp.1 & cdrom.1 targets, followed by optionally
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
