Re: BEWARE: CAM changes broke AHC!

1999-10-01 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Wemm writes : >If you boot with a -current kernel: > >(da0:ahc0:0:0:0) data overrun detected in Data-In phase. Tag = 0x8 >(da0:ahc0:0:0:0) Have seen Data Phase. Length = 0, NumSGs = 1 > >Backing out the following sys/cam/scsi change set: > >revision 1.39 >dat

Re: Loss of Functionality with newpnp

1999-10-01 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Daniel C. Sobral" writes: : I don't know, I have never used the aic driver before. It would seem : that aic users were not that unhappy with the driver. I tried getting it to work on 5 different occasions on one of 8 different cards. 0 for 8. I didn't try the pcmc

Re: FICL breakage...

1999-10-01 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Warner Losh wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Daniel C. Sobral" writes: > : OTOH, if we are still perl-safe, I could send you the newer perl > : script, so you can adapt from that. > > FWIW, one mus have perl installed to build a kernel. Yeah, but one must have world installed to build

Re: Loss of Functionality with newpnp

1999-10-01 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Warner Losh wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Daniel C. Sobral" writes: > : Let me chime in here. We *DO* care about ancient AIC drivers as long > : as no PCMCIA alternative exists. > > Justin has said that porting old scsi aic to cam wouldn't be too hard, > but would still provide a le

Re: BEWARE: CAM changes broke AHC!

1999-10-01 Thread Bruce Evans
> I am particularly suspicious about this: > > @@ -284,26 +283,14 @@ > return (error); /* error code from tsleep */ > } > > - if ((softc->flags & DA_FLAG_OPEN) == 0) { > - if (cam_periph_acquire(periph) != CAM_REQ_CMP) > - return

Re: BEWARE: CAM changes broke AHC!

1999-10-01 Thread Manfred Antar
At 06:03 AM 10/02/99 +0800, Peter Wemm wrote: >If you boot with a -current kernel: > >(da0:ahc0:0:0:0) data overrun detected in Data-In phase. Tag = 0x8 >(da0:ahc0:0:0:0) Have seen Data Phase. Length = 0, NumSGs = 1 > >Backing out the following sys/cam/scsi change set: Something also happened on

Re: sigset_t: a summary

1999-10-01 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
Nate Williams wrote: > > > 1. Should the ucontext_t changes be backed out, or is this the > >way we would like to go? (but only it better :-) > > We need something. Rather than say 'something better', I'd need to see > what that better things is. However, given Bruce's comments earlier, it

Re: BEWARE: CAM changes broke AHC!

1999-10-01 Thread Matthew Jacob
While I don't dispute that the change rolling/rollout fixed what you see, I'd have to say that if they're related there are *far* more serious problems in there. > (da0:ahc0:0:0:0) data overrun detected in Data-In phase. Tag = 0x8 > (da0:ahc0:0:0:0) Have seen Data Phase. Length = 0, NumSGs = 1

Re: ahc failure while updating from pre-signal-change

1999-10-01 Thread Matthew Hunt
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 09:35:51PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > Please boot your old system and email the output from > fdisk da0 > disklabel da0 > >---snip--- > >(da0:ahc0:0:0:0): have seen Data Phase. Length = 0. NumSGs = 1. > >(da0:ahc0:0:0:0): data overrun detected in Data-I

CVSup core dumps

1999-10-01 Thread Leonard Sitongia
I updated yesterday, installed the world and a new kernel. That all worked. Today when I run cvsup with the same supfile I used yesterday I get a core dump: # cvsup /root/current-supfile *** *** runtime error: ***Segmentation violation - possible attempt to dereference NIL *** Abort tra

Re: CVSup core dumps

1999-10-01 Thread Chris Costello
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999, Leonard Sitongia wrote: > # gdb cvsup.core > GNU gdb 4.18 > Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are > welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. > Type "sho

Re: CVSup core dumps

1999-10-01 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
Leonard Sitongia wrote: > > Is there a new static binary to use? > No. Using an old one should fix this. -- Marcel Moolenaarmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SCC Internetworking & Databases http://www.scc.nl/ The FreeBSD projectmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

machine freeze at boot

1999-10-01 Thread Jason Nordwick
In the last month something has changed that now causes my machine to lock up just before PCI bus detection (I don't know if it happens in the PCI detection or in the driver before that). It appears that it happens early enough that the kernel debugger isn't ready, yet, as the magic C-A-Esc doesn

BEWARE: CAM changes broke AHC!

1999-10-01 Thread Peter Wemm
If you boot with a -current kernel: (da0:ahc0:0:0:0) data overrun detected in Data-In phase. Tag = 0x8 (da0:ahc0:0:0:0) Have seen Data Phase. Length = 0, NumSGs = 1 Backing out the following sys/cam/scsi change set: revision 1.39 date: 1999/10/01 09:34:09; author: phk; state: Exp; lines: +4

Re: new sigset_t and upgrading: a proposal

1999-10-01 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
Daniel Eischen wrote: > > Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > > > > How about this: early in make world, we check whether or not the > > > current kernel supports the new syscalls. If it does, good. If it > > > doesn't, we build and load a small module which installs sysc

Re: ahc failure while updating from pre-signal-change

1999-10-01 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
Please boot your old system and email the output from fdisk da0 disklabel da0 Poul-Henning In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -SB.de writes: >Hi, > >last cvsup: 1 Okt 18:19 GMT > >I've build a new kernel and rebooted to be able to make a new world >(aktual system:

Re: new sigset_t and upgrading: a proposal

1999-10-01 Thread Daniel Eischen
Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > > How about this: early in make world, we check whether or not the > > current kernel supports the new syscalls. If it does, good. If it > > doesn't, we build and load a small module which installs syscalls > > which translate the sigset_

ahc failure while updating from pre-signal-change

1999-10-01 Thread A . Leidinger
Hi, last cvsup: 1 Okt 18:19 GMT I've build a new kernel and rebooted to be able to make a new world (aktual system: pre-signal-change, around Sep 29). Right after "Automatic reboot in progress..." I get: ---snip--- (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): have seen Data Phase. Length = 0. NumSGs = 1. (da0:ahc0:0:0:0):

Re: new sigset_t and upgrading: a proposal

1999-10-01 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > How about this: early in make world, we check whether or not the > current kernel supports the new syscalls. If it does, good. If it > doesn't, we build and load a small module which installs syscalls > which translate the sigset_t stuff into something the old sysca

No Subject

1999-10-01 Thread alanr
unsubscribe freebsd-current To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: current and mouse breakage

1999-10-01 Thread Roger Hardiman
Hi, I found the cause of my mouse failing to work after my recent make world. I forgot I had just installed mgetty before my make world and set mgett to listen to the same COM port as my mouse. Oops. Sorry for the noise to -current. Roger -- Roger Hardiman| Telepresence Research Gro

Re: sigset_t: a summary

1999-10-01 Thread Nate Williams
> 1. Should the ucontext_t changes be backed out, or is this the >way we would like to go? (but only it better :-) We need something. Rather than say 'something better', I'd need to see what that better things is. However, given Bruce's comments earlier, it seems like we need to have uconte

Re: ata driver (again)

1999-10-01 Thread Luke
> A dmesg to start with would be fine that way I may be able to reproduce > it here pn semilar HW. wdc0: unit 0 (wd0): , LBA, DMA, 32-bit, multi-block-16, sleep-hack wd0: 8693MB (17803440 sectors), 1108 cyls, 255 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S (sleep-hack I turned on last night) >> > /kernel: wd0

Socket problems

1999-10-01 Thread Thomas Schuerger
Hi! I´m running an FTP server on my FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT system using BeroFTPD. If I allow many users to connect simultaneously, after some hours I get error messages like "ping: socket buffer overflow" or "no sockets available". Anything requiring sockets cannot be used then. Netscape tells me th

Re: Recent kernel hangs during boot with pnp sio.

1999-10-01 Thread Daniel Eischen
Soren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Daniel M. Eischen wrote: > > > > More info on the kernel hang. > > > > Removing pnp from the kernel configuration will allow me to boot > > and successfully detects my pnp modem. So the culprit seems to > > be the new pnp code. Suggestions welcome. > > Hmm, I a

Re: Dump device

1999-10-01 Thread German Tischler
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 09:35:32AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > Could you send med the output of > fdisk da0 > disklabel da0 > > please ? Greg's hint already solved the problem. I had put more memory into the machine and forgot to increase the swapspace, so it could not hold

Re: system freezes with today's kernel

1999-10-01 Thread Bob Bishop
Hi, I wrote: >With today's kernel (cvsup at Thu Sep 30 04:04:55 BST 1999), this system >freezes (no DDB, nothing) as soon as any load is put on it (eg very early >in buildworld). FWIW, something that changed in the subsequent 24hrs fixed this. I'm suspicious of the fact that the netcard: ed1:

Re: Recent kernel hangs during boot with pnp sio.

1999-10-01 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Daniel M. Eischen wrote: > > More info on the kernel hang. > > Removing pnp from the kernel configuration will allow me to boot > and successfully detects my pnp modem. So the culprit seems to > be the new pnp code. Suggestions welcome. Hmm, I also have severe problems with the PnP s

Re: Recent kernel hangs during boot with pnp sio.

1999-10-01 Thread Daniel M. Eischen
More info on the kernel hang. Removing pnp from the kernel configuration will allow me to boot and successfully detects my pnp modem. So the culprit seems to be the new pnp code. Suggestions welcome. Here's a successful verbose boot with a kernel from Sept 30th sources. intpm0: at devi

Re: something odd w/ bind/named, I think

1999-10-01 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anyways, why are you running CURRENT on an ircd? Why not go with STABLE? There's no reason not to run -CURRENT on an IRC server, provided one is qualified to run -CURRENT in the first place. If one is not, the preferred version would be 3.3-REL

Re: new sigset_t and upgrading: a proposal

1999-10-01 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The problem > --- > When doing a make world, tools are being built that are used by the > build process. This is to make sure that the tools are appropriate for > doing a make world. The problem we now face is that the sigset_t change > causes

mouse breakage in Current

1999-10-01 Thread Roger Hardiman
Hi, Since CVSuping yesterday (after Marcels sig changes) my RS232 mouse has stopped working. It no longer works in XFree86 3.9.16 which talks directly to /dev/cuaa0 And I cannot get the mouse to work in /stand/sysinstall either (with moused). cat /dev/cuaa0 does give me characters when I move t

Re: sigset_t: a summary

1999-10-01 Thread Daniel Eischen
Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > So, to start with issue 2: > > To start with the beginning: > > 1. Should the ucontext_t changes be backed out, or is this the >way we would like to go? (but only it better :-) I think we want to keep the ucontext changes. SUSv2 requires them when SA_SIGINFO is se

Recent kernel hangs during boot with pnp sio.

1999-10-01 Thread Daniel M. Eischen
I have a pnp modem "SupraExpress 56i Sp V.90" that works fine with a kernel from Aug 22. Here is an excerpt from a successful boot: atkbdc0: at port 0x60-0x6f on isa0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 vga0: at port 0x3b0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0 sc0: on isa0 sc0:

sigset_t: a summary

1999-10-01 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
Ok, While in general the integration went well, a couple of issues have been raised. These are: 1. building with a -current source tree on -stable fails. This also means that we currently don't have the possibility to upgrade from -stable to -current. 2. Incompatibilities wrt to the disapp

Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed

1999-10-01 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > hmmm.. that might be an option of providing a kld that emulates the new > syscalls on an older kernel... I would want the patch to be available > for staticly linking into the kernel though.. I don't like LKM/KLD's on > servers that are suppose to be rock solid... (a

Re: system freezes with today's kernel

1999-10-01 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Thu, 30 Sep 1999 17:00:28 GMT, Bob Bishop wrote: > With today's kernel (cvsup at Thu Sep 30 04:04:55 BST 1999), this system > freezes (no DDB, nothing) as soon as any load is put on it (eg very early > in buildworld). >From the discussions I see which followed the recent changes to our sign