On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> So far about alls I have confirmed is that the problem does not exists
> with BIOS 1009 when the apm code is not compiled into the kernel. I'll
> have a full matrix of with/without apm 1008/1009/1010 some time tomarrow,
> as the machines are buildin
> OK, Upgraded my Asus P2B-D machien from BIOS version 1008 to 1010, the
> problem disappeared. Popped back to my old 1008 BIOS, problem came back.
So far about alls I have confirmed is that the problem does not exists
with BIOS 1009 when the apm code is not compiled into the kernel. I'll
have
OK, Upgraded my Asus P2B-D machien from BIOS version 1008 to 1010, the
problem disappeared. Popped back to my old 1008 BIOS, problem came back.
Looks like there was some wierd issue that got resolved in 1009 or 1010.
- ( Adam Strohl ) -
- UNI
> Anybody know if this ever got ported to FreeBSD?
It has now. See /usr/ports/benchmarks/postmark/
--
-- David([EMAIL PROTECTED])
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Friday, 17 September 1999 at 11:17:48 -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> : Might I then request that you help rewrite it so that it performs
> :a much more comprehensive testing of OS/filesystem throughput?
> :Myself, I'd really love to see something that lets you seriously
> :stress your syste
Mike Smith wrote:
> > Matthew Dillon wrote:> thereabouts. Patches have been posted to several ma
iling lists, I was
> > wondering whether they've been committed somewhere along the line, and
> > whether APM was safe for inclusion into a 4.0-CURRENT SMP kernel again.
>
> APM and SMP are not f
> Matthew Dillon wrote:> thereabouts. Patches have been posted to several mailing
>lists, I was
> wondering whether they've been committed somewhere along the line, and
> whether APM was safe for inclusion into a 4.0-CURRENT SMP kernel again.
APM and SMP are not functional in -current; this bro
On Sat, Sep 18, 1999, Chris Costello wrote:
>As is the case with mine. (PCI NE2000 type card -- Kingston
> KNE20BT)
KNE30BT. Typo.
--
|Chris Costello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|MIPS: Meaningless Indicator of Processor Speed.
`
To Unsubscribe
On Sat, Sep 18, 1999, Sean O'Connell wrote:
> Chris-
>
> This has been my experience, too. What kind of soundcard do
> you have? Mine is Crystal CS4236B
Sound Blaster 64.
>
> FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm) Sep 17 1999 00:55:11
> Installed devices:
> pcm0: at io 0x530 irq 5 drq 0:1 (1/1 ch
On 1999 Sep 18, Chris Costello (aka [EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 18, 1999, Bill/Carolyn Pechter wrote:
> > Is user mode ppp involved here with any one else?
>
>RealVideo stuff from http://www.broadcast.com/events/nasa
> (IIRC) caused my system to crash, and I'm not using PPP at all
Hi,
> We're seenig it too in the 19990815ish time frame. This is both with
> the 3.2R binaries AND the ones rebuilt and reinstalled.
Saw it too on my ASUS P2B-DS (F.Rev.1008)
Solved by a patch flooding around to /sys/i386/isa/clock.c But why?
The patch is attached.
Bye!
Michael Reifenberge
On Sat, Sep 18, 1999, Bill/Carolyn Pechter wrote:
> Is user mode ppp involved here with any one else?
RealVideo stuff from http://www.broadcast.com/events/nasa
(IIRC) caused my system to crash, and I'm not using PPP at all.
I believe it's got something to do with newpcm.
--
|Chris Costello <
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael R
eifenberger writes:
>Hi,
>> We're seenig it too in the 19990815ish time frame. This is both with
>> the 3.2R binaries AND the ones rebuilt and reinstalled.
>Saw it too on my ASUS P2B-DS (F.Rev.1008)
>Solved by a patch flooding around to /sys/i386/isa/cl
It seems I'm not the only one seeing crashes involving Real Audio
Streams.
Interesting. I had a similar repeatable incident with the -current box crashing
when running Real Audio/Video (ABC TV news) from my wife's box
over the aliased user mode ppp connection over my 33.6.
Going back to a ppp r
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Andrzej
Bialecki writes:
: The problem seems to occur reliably on ASUS boards - perhaps a
: coincidence, but I have several machines here which behave this way. And
: yes, libkvm is in perfect sync with the rest of the system (3.3-RC)
We're seenig it too in the 199
Hi!
I've just configured a couple of MultiPort Cards on my 3.2FreeBSD using sio
driver.
All works fine (Or so seems) but i got the following messages at boot:
sio5: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0x8
sio5 at 0x2a8-0x2af flags 0x701 on isa
sio5: type 16550A (multiport)
and this for
> <
>said:
>
> > I've been getting this too on 4.0-C, just rebuild last night, still there.
> > top displays:
> > CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0%
> > idle
>
> On my dual-PPro Intel BB440FX system I am not seeing this.
Do you have apm compiled in or not?
On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
>
> Yes, it definitely seems ASUS related... I dropped back to uni processor
> ASUS boards, and it's fine. didn't need the SMP anyway, just wanted to
> play with it some more.
Now, here's the difference - I don't play, I NEED SMP, and the machines in
< said:
> I've been getting this too on 4.0-C, just rebuild last night, still there.
> top displays:
> CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0%
> idle
On my dual-PPro Intel BB440FX system I am not seeing this.
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are
Yes, it definitely seems ASUS related... I dropped back to uni processor
ASUS boards, and it's fine. didn't need the SMP anyway, just wanted to
play with it some more.
On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Sep 1999, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
>
> > > :> I/O, and then clo
Matthew Dillon wrote:
>> 4.0-CURRENT (SMP on an ASUS P2B-DS with two CPU's installed; BIOS revision
>> 1008.A, running `systat -vm 1' gives the normal display but without any
>> numbers filled in, then switches over to an empty screen that says:
[..]
> Whenever systat or top do weird things i
On Fri, 17 Sep 1999, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > :> I/O, and then closing it.
> > :
> > :4.0-CURRENT (SMP on an ASUS P2B-DS with two CPU's installed; BIOS revision
> > :1008.A, running `systat -vm 1' gives the normal display but without any
> > :numbers filled in, then switches over to an emp
22 matches
Mail list logo
