Re: NFSv3 on freebsd<-->solaris

1999-08-24 Thread Doug Rabson
On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: > :... > :am not implying that the problem might be on the FreeBSD side, it might > :as well be a bug in solaris NFS implementation). > : > :I would greatly appreciate any help with the following problem. I have > :a FreeBSD NFS server (3.2-STABLE, b

Re: Softupdates reliability?

1999-08-24 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Richard Tobin wrote: > > > Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x580 Stepping=0 > > > You have one of the first K6-2s off the line. There were definite problems > > with these, and as such, they were specially distinguished by having 66 > > printed on top. > > I have a 0x580 which has had no problem

Re: Softupdates reliability?

1999-08-24 Thread Stephen McKay
On Tuesday, 24th August 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote: >Hmm. I would generally expect SCSI errors etc to occur. Assuming the driver >reports those one would at least know the bus was whacko. I saw no errors, but that's not entirely surprising since I was running X11 and by that time xconsole was proba

Alpha/PC98/ i4b patches

1999-08-24 Thread Julian Elischer
I've been moving devfs forward to match PHK's latest changes, however there are some files I cannot test. These effect the ISDN stack, the alpha port and the PC98 code. If you can test these, apply the patch file found at http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/ and let me know if it breaks anythi

Unhappy recent -CURRENT's (was Re: Monday strikes again)

1999-08-24 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Tue, Aug 24, 1999 at 03:52:15PM -0500, a little birdie told me that Matthew D. Fuller remarked > > Here is some info from the panic I got mid-late April. I'll try > cvsup'ing and building a new kernel tonite and see if it's fixed, but in > case it isn't here's some info. Update: -CURRENT now

Re: Monday part II: The Terror Continues

1999-08-24 Thread Mike Smith
> This is the third unusable snap in a row that I've had the misfortune > to encounter. I'm starting to think this is more than a coincidence. Did > somebody launch a "Piss Bill Off" contest when I wasn't looking or > something? If so, let me stress that you really don't want to find out > what

Re: NFSv3 on freebsd<-->solaris

1999-08-24 Thread Alfred Perlstein
On 25 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Why would solaris machine make a request with vers=4: > >> galois.math.uic.edu -> galileo.math.uic.edu PORTMAP C GETPORT prog=100021 >(NLM) vers=4 proto=UDP > >> ? > >> (am I right that vers here is the same as the NFS version)

Re: Softupdates reliability?

1999-08-24 Thread Rodney W. Grimes
> On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Richard Tobin wrote: > > > > > Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x580 Stepping=0 > > > > > You have one of the first K6-2s off the line. There were definite problems > > > with these, and as such, they were specially distinguished by having 66 > > > printed on top. > > >

Re: followup to apm problems.

1999-08-24 Thread Mitsuru IWASAKI
Hi, I'd like to have full output of dmesg to investigate hardware interference in apm. Could you send me it later? > 'apm -Z' for standby jumps into standby mode for like.. an instant, then > comes right back out (while playing mp3) [snip] > 'zzz' or 'apm -z' for suspend jumps into suspend mode

Re: NFSv3 on freebsd<-->solaris

1999-08-24 Thread vladimir
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 25 01:11:10 1999 >Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 21:21:27 -0400 (EDT) >From: Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >cc: [EMAIL PR

VN fixed

1999-08-24 Thread Matthew Dillon
I have submitted a patch to DG that fixes VN for CURRENT. Since VN is currently broken on CURRENT, the patch is on a fast-track for commit. I've include the patch below, but beware that it may be committed quickly. This also fixes swap-backed VN. The -S option can be applied

K6-2 revisions (was: Re: Softupdates reliability?)

1999-08-24 Thread Stephen McKay
On Tuesday, 24th August 1999, "Brian F. Feldman" wrote: >On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Richard Tobin wrote: > >> > > Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x580 Stepping=0 >> >> > You have one of the first K6-2s off the line. There were definite problems >> > with these, and as such, they were specially disti

Re: NFSv3 on freebsd<-->solaris

1999-08-24 Thread Alfred Perlstein
On 24 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Following advice from Cejka Rudolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, I have edited > /src/sys/nfs/nfs_syscalls.c (commented out the lines after the "Solaris 2.5" > comment). The "File exists" errors went away, everything seemed normal, > but then I ran into anot

New kernel crashes as of yesterday

1999-08-24 Thread Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS Tensor Perth
After the vm subsystem changes that went in yesterday, I expierence crashes under heavy load situations (typically when running quake2 in OpenGL mode). A kernel built on the 23rd works fine. A kernel backtrace follows # gdb -k kernel.debug /var/crash/vmcore.12 GNU gdb 4.18 Copyright 1998 Free S

Re: Softupdates reliability?

1999-08-24 Thread Brian F. Feldman
On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Richard Tobin wrote: > > > Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x580 Stepping=0 > > > You have one of the first K6-2s off the line. There were definite problems > > with these, and as such, they were specially distinguished by having 66 > > printed on top. > > I have a 0x580 w

Re: Monday part II: The Terror Continues

1999-08-24 Thread Wilko Bulte
As Bill Paul wrote ... [...] > This is the third unusable snap in a row that I've had the misfortune > to encounter. I'm starting to think this is more than a coincidence. Did > somebody launch a "Piss Bill Off" contest when I wasn't looking or > something? If so, let me stress that you really

Re: whither readline.h?

1999-08-24 Thread Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami
* From: Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * I think using bsd.subdir.mk is an error if there is anything more to * be done than traversing subdirs. bsd.subdir.mk is mainly for optimising * this special case. * * Using bsd.lib.mk would be bogus since there are no libraries to be made, * and

Re: Softupdates reliability?

1999-08-24 Thread Richard Tobin
> > Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x580 Stepping=0 > You have one of the first K6-2s off the line. There were definite problems > with these, and as such, they were specially distinguished by having 66 > printed on top. I have a 0x580 which has had no problems at all. I'm pretty certain it d

Re: libalias or libnat. Vote ?

1999-08-24 Thread John Polstra
In article <3843.935363694@localhost>, Jordan K. Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've been on both sides of this issue, to be sure, but I have to say > that looking at it now, I can't see any reason to change the actual > name of the library right now unless we're also going to go whole-ho

Re: problem with the ata driver

1999-08-24 Thread Nicolas Souchu
On Tue, Aug 24, 1999 at 08:39:25AM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: >> Which ones, I found nothing in the LINT file related to ATA. > >"There is no user serviceable parts inside" :) and if patch someone just >posted works it seems like the drive is abusing the standard. I'll look >at it asap, then lets

Re: Any chances to solve bin/7973?

1999-08-24 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 8:44 AM +0200 8/24/99, Cejka Rudolf wrote: >Garance A Drosihn wrote (1999/08/23): > > > Why would the filter be reading the control file? It is just a > > filter, supposedly reading from stdin and writing to stdout... > >Yes and not. > >You can look into apsfilter for example. It gets from con

Re: Monday strikes again

1999-08-24 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 09:44:10PM +0100, a little birdie told me that Doug Rabson remarked > > It seems like isa bus is never being attached for some reason. Have a > look at nexus_attach() and see if anything suspicious is happening (like > an error return from device_probe_and_attach()). FWI

Re: whither readline.h?

1999-08-24 Thread Bruce Evans
>It is probably because /usr/src/gnu/lib/libreadline/Makefile use >bsd.subdir.mk and not bsd.lib.mk. Their distribute targets are different. >I don't know if you can just slot bsd.lib.mk in there because the >libreadline have some subdirs that have to be handled. I think using bsd.subdir.mk is an

Monday part II: The Terror Continues

1999-08-24 Thread Bill Paul
So today my ISA bus is detected properly and the kernel gets as far as trying to launch /stand/sysinstall, but then, just when I thought it was safe to try and load a new snapshot: rootfs is 2880 Kbyte compiled in MFS spec_getpages: I/O read failure: (error code=0) bp 0xc34fc3a0 vp 0xc7ed8ec0

Re: Monday part II: The Terror Continues

1999-08-24 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
I just found out myself, fix (I hope) committed. >spec_getpages: I/O read failure: (error code=0) bp 0xc34fc3a0 vp 0xc7ed8ec0 > size: 0, resid: 0, a_count: 49152, valid: 0x0 > nread: 0, reqpage: 0, pindex: 0, pcount: 12 -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD corete

Re: NFSv3 on freebsd<-->solaris

1999-08-24 Thread vladimir
Following advice from Cejka Rudolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, I have edited /src/sys/nfs/nfs_syscalls.c (commented out the lines after the "Solaris 2.5" comment). The "File exists" errors went away, everything seemed normal, but then I ran into another problem. mailx on solaris client could not

Re: SIO "lost interrupt" status in current?

1999-08-24 Thread Nate Williams
> > I'm actually pretty sure it happens even without X11 live. This worries m > e! > > changing the modem serial speed down from 57600 through 33600 to 19200 ma > de > > no difference. This also worries me. > > If the speed isn't being set down, then somehow interrupts are being >

Re: Softupdates reliability?

1999-08-24 Thread Brian F. Feldman
On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Stephen McKay wrote: > > Oh, and Brian wanted to know the processor revision. I don't know of any > problems with K6-2/300s, but here's the info: > > CPU: AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor (300.68-MHz 586-class CPU) > Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x580 Stepping=0 > Features=0x

Re: NFSv3 on freebsd<-->solaris

1999-08-24 Thread Cejka Rudolf
David O'Brien wrote (1999/08/23): > - - Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] - > Solaris 7 machines cannot use NFSv3 mounts from a FreeBSD NFS server. > ... > # rm -r /home/2/vladimir > rm: Unable to remove directory /home/2/vladimir/CVS/blowup/c: File exists > ... Yes, this is very

Re: whither readline.h?

1999-08-24 Thread John Hay
> * From: "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * > /usr/include/readline/readline.h (and whatever else that's supposed to > * > be in that directory) has been missing from 4-current and 3-stable > * > snaps for awhile. Does anyone know why? > * > * I just checked that cd /usr/src/gnu/l

Re: Softupdates reliability?

1999-08-24 Thread Wilko Bulte
As Peter Jeremy wrote ... > Stephen McKay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I was extracting from the Exabyte to the DDRS disk while applying a CTM > >update from that disk against one of the DCAS disks when it crashed. The > >Exabyte went wonky (took about 6 goes to get the tape ejected) and the > >

Re: followup to apm problems.

1999-08-24 Thread Mike Muir
Yeh, i just got all the latest sources (as of 24th August) and made em: $Id: apm.c,v 1.103 1999/08/23 20:58:36 phk Exp $ So yes i do have that recent version, but my problems persist. :( Nick Hibma wrote: > > Are you running CURRENT? > > Could you check whether you have at least rev. 101 of >

Re: whither readline.h?

1999-08-24 Thread Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami
* From: "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * > /usr/include/readline/readline.h (and whatever else that's supposed to * > be in that directory) has been missing from 4-current and 3-stable * > snaps for awhile. Does anyone know why? * * I just checked that cd /usr/src/gnu/lib/libreadline

Re: Softupdates reliability?

1999-08-24 Thread Stephen McKay
On Tuesday, 24th August 1999, Peter Jeremy wrote: >The exact order of events is not clear from this. In general, I'd say >that if something managed to upset the SCSI bus sufficiently to >confuse every target on it, then there's a reasonably likelihood that >data transfers were also corrupted. A