Aureal Vortex soundcard drivers

1999-07-25 Thread Kenneth Wayne Culver
I was just wondering how the drivers on the aureal vortex are coming along... I know that Cameron Grant was working on them, but I have not heard anything on that subject fora while, so I was kinda hoping to hear about it soon. Thanks. Kenneth Culver To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTE

Re: userland ppp - startup

1999-07-25 Thread Josef Karthauser
On Wed, Jul 07, 1999 at 10:02:44PM +0100, Brian Somers wrote: > > This aside, I think there are more bits required for the patches :*1 > > rc.conf.5 needs to be updated - that's the easy bit. Done - see attached. > I think we also need a src/etc/ppp/ppp.conf that installs with 0600 > permissi

Re: whereis broken?

1999-07-25 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Sun, 25 Jul 1999 21:33:55 +0200, Mark Murray wrote: > > It's been pointed out to me in private mail that current's > > manpath.config is broken. > > Fixed. Hi Dan, You'll need rev 1.11 of src/gnu/usr.bin/man/manpath/manpath.config, but you should be able to get away with commenting out th

Re: whereis broken?

1999-07-25 Thread Mark Murray
> It's been pointed out to me in private mail that current's > manpath.config is broken. If nobody's looked at it by tomorrow, I'll do > so then. Fixed. M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-c

Re: whereis broken?

1999-07-25 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
* Sheldon Hearn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [990725 20:29]: > > > On Sun, 25 Jul 1999 14:12:53 -0400, Dan Moschuk wrote: > > > whereis anything yields.. > > > > Warning: couldn't stat file /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.00502/man! > > Staleness. Unfortunately, the whereis(1) manpage doesn't tell you to > loo

Re: whereis broken?

1999-07-25 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Sun, 25 Jul 1999 20:12:46 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > Warning: couldn't stat file /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.00502/man! > > Staleness. It's been pointed out to me in private mail that current's manpath.config is broken. If nobody's looked at it by tomorrow, I'll do so then. Ciao, Sheldon.

Re: PLIP is still broken :(

1999-07-25 Thread Bruce Evans
>>Otherwise, >>the generic code is missing mainly update of the interrupt masks when >>an interrupt is unregistered. > >For the low level side, we could consider something like the following code. >But this shall be called by the nexus layer and then needs generic newbus >support (as you said abov

Re: whereis broken?

1999-07-25 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Sun, 25 Jul 1999 14:12:53 -0400, Dan Moschuk wrote: > whereis anything yields.. > > Warning: couldn't stat file /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.00502/man! Staleness. Unfortunately, the whereis(1) manpage doesn't tell you to look at the manpath(1) manpage. Do so now and you'll see that you should ch

whereis broken?

1999-07-25 Thread Dan Moschuk
whereis anything yields.. Warning: couldn't stat file /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.00502/man! Warning: couldn't stat file /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.00502/man! Warning: couldn't stat file /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.00502/man! Warning: couldn't stat file /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.00502/man! Warning: couldn't stat

Re: PLIP is still broken :(

1999-07-25 Thread Nicolas Souchu
On Sun, Jul 25, 1999 at 09:35:36AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > >>>Possible quick fix (hack): change all the spltty()'s in lpt.c to >>>splnet()'s. lpt isn't a tty driver; it just abuses spltty(). Abusing >>>splnet() instead should work OK for lpt and fix if_plip. >> >>This seems good until the in

Re: Unkillable processes

1999-07-25 Thread Zhihui Zhang
> > No. You can't kill a process which is in kernel mode. If it doesn't > come out, you won't be able to stop it. It seems rather unlikely that > that's the case here, though. It seems to me that a process can only suicide after it detects somebody wants to kill it. Anyway, it is the process

Re: Unkillable processes

1999-07-25 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Nope. I did attach to it with gdb at one point to try and figure out what > it was running, but because it was compiled w/o debugging symbols I didn't > get anything out of a backtrace except for something similar to: You *can* compile it again, just adding the -g and _w

Re: Unkillable processes

1999-07-25 Thread Amancio Hasty
> On Sun, 25 Jul 1999, Amancio Hasty wrote: > > > while you are at it try to compile a kernel with symbols ... > > I already have (this is my standard practice). What should I do with it > here? > > Kris > Well, if the process is not in a zombie state and you can't kill it . We may need to e

Re: Unkillable processes

1999-07-25 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, 25 Jul 1999, Amancio Hasty wrote: > while you are at it try to compile a kernel with symbols ... I already have (this is my standard practice). What should I do with it here? Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the mes

Re: Unkillable processes

1999-07-25 Thread Amancio Hasty
while you are at it try to compile a kernel with symbols ... -- Amancio Hasty [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: Unkillable processes

1999-07-25 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, 25 Jul 1999, Greg Lehey wrote: > > The tcsh listed below that is a zombie of the running kvt. > > There aren't any zombies here. Right, they'd show up as 'Z' in the state field, I'd guess. > > This seems to be more of a kvt bug than a freebsd bug. :) > > I don't see that either. T

Re: FreeBSD-current and Netscape Java

1999-07-25 Thread Sheldon Hearn
[Hijacked from the freebsd-current mailing list] On Sat, 24 Jul 1999 19:46:52 -0400, Bill Pechter wrote: > Are there any tricks to getting Java in Netscape running with > FreeBSD --current. Just because CURRENT is the platform you use when you encounter a problem, doesn't mean that the freeb

Re: IDE_DELAY

1999-07-25 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Sat, 24 Jul 1999 20:26:56 +0200, Thomas Schuerger wrote: > I've set the option > > IDE_DELAY=1500 Did you read the warning in LINT about this one? # Setting this below 1 violate the IDE specs, but may still work for # you (it will work for most people). _May_ still work for you imp

Re: PR 12634

1999-07-25 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Sat, 24 Jul 1999 18:47:37 +0200, Nick Hibma wrote: > PR 12634 mentions the increase of MAXSYMLINKS (src/sys/sys/param.h) to > 64. There has to be a limit. Like so many limits, it has to increase as more and more people bump up against it, provided: 1) They're not bumping up against

Re: Unkillable processes

1999-07-25 Thread Greg Lehey
On Sunday, 25 July 1999 at 1:21:03 -0500, Kevin Day wrote: >> On Saturday, 24 July 1999 at 20:51:37 -0500, Kevin Day wrote: On Sat, 24 Jul 1999, Kevin Day wrote: > For one, do another 'ps' with the 'l' option, so you can see what it's stuck > on. UID PID PPID CPU