>> This wouldn't help the poor sod whose connection gets shot down every
>> eight days while he's not there and doesn't know what hit him.
> If the poor sod hasn't touched his xterm for 8 days, he's either dead
> or he doesn't care if it goes away.
Again, Matt, with all due respect, please do not
On 09-Jun-99 Chuck Robey wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, W Gerald Hicks wrote:
>
>> > Our GNU patch has gone stale in the tree. Anyone want to upgrade it to
>> > 2.5?
>> > If not, I'll do it myself eventually. Patch 2.1 which we have now is
>> > broken
>> > for certain diffs (recently tried with gi
On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, W Gerald Hicks wrote:
> > Our GNU patch has gone stale in the tree. Anyone want to upgrade it to 2.5?
> > If not, I'll do it myself eventually. Patch 2.1 which we have now is broken
> > for certain diffs (recently tried with gimp 1.1.5-1.1.6 diffs), while 2.5
> > works fine.
>
> Our GNU patch has gone stale in the tree. Anyone want to upgrade it to 2.5?
> If not, I'll do it myself eventually. Patch 2.1 which we have now is broken
> for certain diffs (recently tried with gimp 1.1.5-1.1.6 diffs), while 2.5
> works fine.
The gimp patch situation offers a good example why
Pete,
I am usually installing many machines at a time, and to save time,
I've put together a simple script that generates the included config
file based on the machine's name. We can do this because our machines
are all configured identically with the exception of the name and IP
address. Once y
On 08-Jun-99 John W. DeBoskey wrote:
> Hi,
>
>I have a -current machine which I use to run a:
>
> cd /usr/src && make world && cd release && make release
>
>every night.
>
>On this machine, the sysinstall manpage is not installed onto
> the system during make world.
>
> % ma
* From: Nik Clayton
* On Tue, Jun 08, 1999 at 07:41:13AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
* > My question is: How do I create /usr/local/share/sgml/docbook/catalog?
* > It doesn't exist in any of the ports.
*
* It's created by the post-install target of ports/textproc/docbook.
Is it arranged to
On Tue, Jun 08, 1999 at 07:41:13AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> My question is: How do I create /usr/local/share/sgml/docbook/catalog?
> It doesn't exist in any of the ports.
It's created by the post-install target of ports/textproc/docbook.
N
--
[intentional self-reference] can be easily accom
.
---> Tue Jun 8 12:14:07 EDT 1999 - build of 4.0-19990608-SNAP was an abject
failure.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 1999 at 03:20:19PM -0400, Brian Feldman wrote:
> > Our GNU patch has gone stale in the tree. Anyone want to upgrade it to 2.5?
> > If not, I'll do it myself eventually. Patch 2.1 which we have now is broken
> > for
> > certain diffs
On Tue, Jun 08, 1999 at 03:20:19PM -0400, Brian Feldman wrote:
> Our GNU patch has gone stale in the tree. Anyone want to upgrade it to 2.5?
> If not, I'll do it myself eventually. Patch 2.1 which we have now is broken
> for
> certain diffs (recently tried with gimp 1.1.5-1.1.6 diffs), while 2.5
Our GNU patch has gone stale in the tree. Anyone want to upgrade it to 2.5?
If not, I'll do it myself eventually. Patch 2.1 which we have now is broken for
certain diffs (recently tried with gimp 1.1.5-1.1.6 diffs), while 2.5 works
fine.
Brian Feldman_ __ ___ ___ ___ ___
On Tue, Jun 08, 1999 at 11:23:26AM -0700, Matthew Dillon
wrote:
> :We've lost our T1 to the world for up to twelve hours.
>
> And at the time, which was more important: Getting the T1 back up, or
> keeping all those idle xterm's around? If it were my T1 that went down,
> I wouldn'
:} you have other problems than worring about connections...
:
:We've lost our T1 to the world for up to twelve hours.
And at the time, which was more important: Getting the T1 back up, or
keeping all those idle xterm's around? If it were my T1 that went down,
I wouldn't give a damn
On Tue, Jun 08, 1999 at 05:23:18PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Just completed fresh make world and discovered that man isn't
> functional:
>
> $ man man
> bad ctype locale env: Invalid argument
>
> Does anybody know what going wrong?
>
Yeah, it happened during ache's commit to src/gnu/usr.bin
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Jeremy [SMTP:jere...@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au]
> Sent: Monday, June 07, 1999 11:41 PM
> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
> Subject: Building www/en
>
> Part of my regular rebuild is a `cd www/en; make -DENGLISH_ONLY'
>
> My question is: How do I creat
> -Original Message-
> From: Chuck Robey [SMTP:chu...@picnic.mat.net]
> Sent: Monday, June 07, 1999 6:32 PM
> To: ito...@iijlab.net
> Cc: David E. Cross; freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
> Subject: Re: wide char support
>
> May you both live in interesting times!
[ML] No, not
On Tue, Jun 08, 1999 at 06:07:23AM -0700, Don Lewis
wrote:
> } yes, but are routers normally down for a couple hours?? if they are,
> } you have other problems than worring about connections...
>
> We've lost our T1 to the world for up to twelve hours.
Well, we had lightning storm yesterday a
Dom Mitchell once wrote:
> This is correct; there is no need for it, as the support for the
> wrappers was built directly into inetd. Check the CVS logs for inetd.
Are not there any other uses for it? Like "xinetd"? If everything else
(the libwrap, the man pages) is there, why not install
On Tue, Jun 08, 1999 at 05:23:18PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Just completed fresh make world and discovered that man isn't
> functional:
>
> $ man man
> bad ctype locale env: Invalid argument
>
> Does anybody know what going wrong?
Tell me values of LANG or LC_CTYPE environment variables you
Just completed fresh make world and discovered that man isn't
functional:
$ man man
bad ctype locale env: Invalid argument
Does anybody know what going wrong?
Maxim
--
"We believe in the Power and the Might!"
(Manowar, 1996)
Maxim
Does anybody know any legacy way to upgrade ld-elf.so.1 when making
world or it always should be reinstalled manually?
Maxim
--
"We believe in the Power and the Might!"
(Manowar, 1996)
Maxim V. Sobolev, Financial Analyst,
Vega Intern
On Jun 5, 5:43pm, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
} Subject: Re: RE: net.inet.tcp.always_keepalive on as default ?
} Garrett Wollman scribbled this message on Jun 5:
} > < said:
} >
} > > FWIW, I think only a fool would want a computer to NOT drop dead
connections.
} > > Any "connection" that doesn't re
Hello!
The last 30 minutes I had two of these spontanous errors.
That's a little strange - I had one some weeks ago.
When I had it the last minutes, I was making install in
/usr/ports/print/tetex-beta/
It was downloading teTeX-texmf-0.9-981113.tar.gz from ftp.freebsd.org
while this. (btw, this po
on current from @jun3 I noticed something odd from dmesg:
CPU: \^E (330.22-MHz 586-class CPU)
It is a K6-2/300 set at 330, the wt_alloc stuff all shows up and nothing seems
broken anywhere, just thought I'd mention it.
Luke
__
XFMail
-
subscribe freebsd-current
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
"Louis A. Mamakos" wrote:
>
> Before documenting it, how about we fix it's name to be more accurate
> to newcomers: net.inet.tcp.always_makedead, etc. There's no part of
> this (in many cases misguided) mechanism that keeps anything "alive."
I disagree. I use keepalive exactly to keep my connecti
I've been running IPFIlter on FreeBSD4.0-Current on my Pentium 233MMX box for a
while now. And up until the middle of last week I haven't had any problems
with it. I cvsup to the latest src tree everynight and make buildworld (done
at 4am with a crontab entry), and every morning I would instal
Louis A. Mamakos wrote:
> Before documenting it, how about we fix it's name to be more accurate
> to newcomers: net.inet.tcp.always_makedead, etc. There's no part of
> this (in many cases misguided) mechanism that keeps anything "alive."
I believe the rationale behind the nomenclature is to ``kee
Peter Jeremy wrote:
> Part of my regular rebuild is a `cd www/en; make -DENGLISH_ONLY'
>
> Lately, this has started failing due to the absence of
> /usr/local/share/sgml/docbook/catalog. This appears to be the
> result of:
>
> >nik 1999/06/03 12:39:30 PDT
> >
> > Modified files:
> >s
On 8 June 1999, "Andrew Reilly" proclaimed:
> Maybe 3.x users actually want tcpd too. I'm running -STABLE, and
> qmail, and discovered that tcp_wrappers was somehow part of the
> system when things started misbehaving. Oddly, tcpd itself is
> _not_ built by the system, it seems.
This is correc
31 matches
Mail list logo
