On 2 Jun 1999 17:20:38 -0400, in sentex.lists.freebsd.current you wrote:
>Inbound mail to "mailbagging" customers is not queued normally by sendmail,
>but is delivered through a local-like mailer to a separate per-user
>queue directory.
>
>When users authenticate, radius uses a back-end RPC service
On Wed, Jun 02, 1999 at 11:03:05PM +0200, Leif Neland wrote:
> > When it comes down to it, there is very little justification for a static
> > address. The one I most commonly hear is "so we can do SMTP mail delivery
> > to the customer", but even that doesn't mandate use of static addressing --
>
On Wed, Jun 02, 1999 at 10:58:41PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Matthew Hunt wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 01, 1999 at 01:59:48PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote:
> >
> > > I think he was suggesting that the apps close the connection if they
> > > receive no data from some amount of time. (Isn't thi
> When it comes down to it, there is very little justification for a static
> address. The one I most commonly hear is "so we can do SMTP mail delivery
> to the customer", but even that doesn't mandate use of static addressing --
> we support SMTP mail delivery (we call it "mailbagging" for some re
Matthew Hunt wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 01, 1999 at 01:59:48PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote:
>
> > I think he was suggesting that the apps close the connection if they
> > receive no data from some amount of time. (Isn't this common sense?)
>
> No, I frequently keep telnet/ssh connections idle
On Wed, 2 Jun 1999, Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS Tensor Perth wrote:
>
> I'm having some problems since when the newbus code went in, in that
> my sound card doesn't seem to be interrupting anymore (PAS16, Voxware
> drivers). So what I'd like to do is look at the kernel and see
> if an i
FDC_YE is still marked as broken with newbus. What's the timetable on
getting this fixed, and is there anything I can do to help out? (I've
been looking for an excuse to learn kernel internals, anyway... ;) I'd
like to upgrade my Libretto to -current, but having a nonfunctional floppy
drive is k
< said:
>> But the sio non-multiport stuff should be able to use RF_TIMESHARE. --
>> If I'm not using my serial port, I should be able to use my
>> infrared
> Preemptive timesharing would be hard to implement reasonably for irqs.
> A uniform timeslice would have to be 86 usec to work properly
On Wed, 2 Jun 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > For EISA, it should be possible to add RF_SHAREABLE to the
> > bus_alloc_resource call (assuming that EISA interrupts are shareable like
> > pci interrupts).
>
> IRRC (it's been years) EISA cards can, but don't have to, support shared
> interrupts. I thin
As Doug Rabson wrote ...
> On Tue, 1 Jun 1999, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 1 Jun 1999, Mark Newton wrote:
> > > So, guys -- What is the officially blessed way of sharing IRQs under
> > > newbus?
> >
> > If you find out, let me know since the EISA code suffers the same problem
> > (though
Nathan Dorfman writes:
> Certain shareware lose95 FTP servers don't know how to do passive mode.
No need to go looking through Windows software; the unjustly popular
ncftp is equally braindead. The ncftp man page makes for very
interesting (and depressing) reading; it is quite obvious that the
au
On Wed, 2 Jun 1999, Leif Neland wrote:
> Where can I find a nice splash-screen?
>
> I'd like to try getting a splash screen, but I'm not sure the image is
> bad, or I just have misconfigured it wrong.
>
> So I wonder if an 'official FreeBSD splash screen' exists.
>
> Or does somebody have any s
writes:
> Is it that long? I honestly don't think I have ever seen one stay up for a
> week. Are you sure you did not mean 48 hours? I don't speak in jest.
49.7 days until an internal millisecond counter rolls around and
crashes the machine.
Microsoft have a patch out, but according to their web
>> This isn't solved. It was less serious before rev.1.196 of vfs_bio.c
>> when B_ERROR buffers were discarded insead of re-dirtied in the above
>> code fragment. See also PR 11697, and about 20 PRs reporting problems
>> with i/o errors and EOF "errors" (ENOSPC/EINVAL) for (mis)using buffered
>>
Where can I find a nice splash-screen?
I'd like to try getting a splash screen, but I'm not sure the image is
bad, or I just have misconfigured it wrong.
So I wonder if an 'official FreeBSD splash screen' exists.
Or does somebody have any splash screen for download somewhere?
Leif
To Unsubsc
I'm having some problems since when the newbus code went in, in that
my sound card doesn't seem to be interrupting anymore (PAS16, Voxware
drivers). So what I'd like to do is look at the kernel and see
if an interrupt actually has a function associated with it, and if
it's being masked out. Any i
Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote:
> The svr4 module is broken after the following change to svr4_machdep.c
> rev 1.5.
> --
> revision 1.5
> date: 1999/06/01 18:20:23; author: jlemon; state: Exp; lines: +0 -4
> Unifdef VM86.
> Revie
On Wed, 2 Jun 1999, Doug Rabson wrote:
> The EISA bus code needs a new maintainer (who could put back such
> things as resource reporting). Are you interested? You seem to be one
> of the few people who actively uses this bus.
I'm still fairly far behind on the learning curve with respect to the
n
The svr4 module is broken after the following change to svr4_machdep.c
rev 1.5.
--
revision 1.5
date: 1999/06/01 18:20:23; author: jlemon; state: Exp; lines: +0 -4
Unifdef VM86.
Reviewed by:silence on on -current
-
On Tue, Jun 01, 1999 at 02:16:55PM -0600, Nate Williams wrote:
> > this is less and less of a problem because
> > if you lose your link on PPP
> > you are liable to get a differetn IP address on your redial.
>
> Not true. Only if you're using a dynamic IP address setup. Most
> business connectio
On Tue, 1 Jun 1999, Joachim Kuebart wrote:
> Stefan Esser wrote:
> > On 1999-05-27 22:12 +0400, oZZ!!! wrote:
> > >
> > > wmsound with my card too can't work correct.
> > > SB 128 PCI its a PCI-device & (as i known) it must be detect as es0 + pcm1
> > > (not pcm0), because pcm0 reserved for ISA-
On Tue, 1 Jun 1999, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jun 1999, Doug Rabson wrote:
> > For EISA, it should be possible to add RF_SHAREABLE to the
> > bus_alloc_resource call (assuming that EISA interrupts are shareable
> > like pci interrupts).
>
> The observed behavior suggests that RF_SHAREABL
22 matches
Mail list logo
