On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 07:33:57AM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 26 May 1999 09:08:11 +0400, "Andrey A. Chernov" wrote:
>
> > Just check 'swapinfo' in recent -current, it shows "/dev/(null)" as swap
> > device, it means that devinfo() call in kvm_getswapinfo() returns NULL,
> > i.e.
Sheldon Hearn wrote...
>
>
> On Wed, 26 May 1999 09:08:11 +0400, "Andrey A. Chernov" wrote:
>
> > Just check 'swapinfo' in recent -current, it shows "/dev/(null)" as swap
> > device, it means that devinfo() call in kvm_getswapinfo() returns NULL,
> > i.e. called with wrong argument which is swin
On Wed, 26 May 1999 09:08:11 +0400, "Andrey A. Chernov" wrote:
> Just check 'swapinfo' in recent -current, it shows "/dev/(null)" as swap
> device, it means that devinfo() call in kvm_getswapinfo() returns NULL,
> i.e. called with wrong argument which is swinfo.sw_dev
Are you sure it isn't simp
On Tue, 25 May 1999 19:12:59 +0200, Sune Stjerneby wrote:
> Am I correct in the assumption that CCD and the new ATA/ATAPI subsystem
> is a bad combination? It won't let me configure ccd0 when using the adx
> rather than wdx syntax..
Without getting into the ccd/vinum comparisons, is there a rea
On Tue, 25 May 1999, Brian Feldman wrote:
> > > > device pcm0 at nexus?
> > > .
> > > > # cd /dev
> > > > # rm audio dsp dspW mixer
> > > > # ./MAKEDEV snd0
> > >
> > > > But play (from ports) can't work...
> > >
> > > That should be snd1 for the pcm driver
> > # cd /dev
> > # rm aud
Just check 'swapinfo' in recent -current, it shows "/dev/(null)" as swap
device, it means that devinfo() call in kvm_getswapinfo() returns NULL,
i.e. called with wrong argument which is swinfo.sw_dev
Fix it, please.
--
Andrey A. Chernov
http://nagual.pp.ru/~ache/
MTH/SH/HE S-- W-- N+ PEC>+ D A a
With egcs, the '-O' flag doesn't specify the optimization level like it
does in GCC. It specifies the desired stability of the generated code. Lower
numbers (0,1,2) request higher stability. ;)
DS
> Dan Nelson wrote:
> > -O4 doesn't exist in egcs (or it didn't a month or so ago).
Dan Nelson wrote:
> -O4 doesn't exist in egcs (or it didn't a month or so ago). According
> to the source, -O2 enables all optimizations except -funroll-all-loops,
> and all -O3 does is enable -funroll-all-loops.
I think I recall reading somewhere that EGCS uses -O numbers > 3 to test
experimenta
Would anyone have any objections to me hacking objcopy so that it could do the
following -
a) Change symbol names from one thing to another
b) Add/remove dependencies on other shared objects.
If I submit these changes, what chance do I have of getting them made
"official"?
Stephen
On Tue, 25 May 1999, oZZ!!! wrote:
>
> On Tue, 25 May 1999, W Gerald Hicks wrote:
>
> > [snips]
> > > device pcm0 at nexus?
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > > # cd /dev
> > > # rm audio dsp dspW mixer
> > > # ./MAKEDEV snd0
> >
> > > But play (from ports) can't work...
> >
> > That should be sn
On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 09:54:31AM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote:
>
> Could you also move the source for ppc out of the i386 tree into somewhere
> architecture independant.
PLEASE ask c...@freebsd.org for a repository copy when you do this. When
you renamed nlpt.c to lpt.c, you just committed a new f
Hi!
There is a driver to read from HPFS partition at:
http://iclub.nsu.ru/~semen/hpfs/hpfs-0.2b.tgz
Testers are welcome.
Bye.
P.S. We can put it in current, and i'll support it.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Disculpe la intromisión.
Tengo que comunicarles que mis tres direcciones principales de
redireccionamiento hasta ahora:
callb...@correo.nu
call-b...@correo.nu
call-b...@correovirtual.com
han sido eliminadas por cese de actividad de su dominio como pueden comprobar
en las direcciones http://www
> > > I am having some problems with a machine I recently rebuilt; I suspect
> > > either the drive geometry or something else in the boot process. The
> > > machine has to be booted "manually".
> > >
> > > Situation: I installed FreeBSD 3.1 on a 4G SCSI disk that had had
> > > Current on it before
< said:
> I'd like to see separate runs, one with each -march= option (i386,
> i486, i586, i686), so see if those many any difference at all.
As you will have seen from my post yesterday, there is no measurable
difference between -march=pentiumpro and no -march= option. You're
certainly welcome
> Mark Murray wrote:
> >
> > If I play around (Hit F5 or space or enter), I get "Invalid partition"
> > errors. Hitting enter at that stage gets me a Boot: prompt. The only
> > thing that gets an actial boot is typing 0:da(1,a)/boot/loader. Then
> > both disks are visible and fine. Both disks have
Mark Murray wrote:
>
> If I play around (Hit F5 or space or enter), I get "Invalid partition"
> errors. Hitting enter at that stage gets me a Boot: prompt. The only
> thing that gets an actial boot is typing 0:da(1,a)/boot/loader. Then
> both disks are visible and fine. Both disks have had fdisk -
> > I am having some problems with a machine I recently rebuilt; I suspect
> > either the drive geometry or something else in the boot process. The
> > machine has to be booted "manually".
> >
> > Situation: I installed FreeBSD 3.1 on a 4G SCSI disk that had had
> > Current on it before (CURRENT s
> I am having some problems with a machine I recently rebuilt; I suspect
> either the drive geometry or something else in the boot process. The
> machine has to be booted "manually".
>
> Situation: I installed FreeBSD 3.1 on a 4G SCSI disk that had had
> Current on it before (CURRENT snaps wouldn'
Hi
I am having some problems with a machine I recently rebuilt; I suspect
either the drive geometry or something else in the boot process. The
machine has to be booted "manually".
Situation: I installed FreeBSD 3.1 on a 4G SCSI disk that had had
Current on it before (CURRENT snaps wouldn't boot).
In the last episode (May 25), Garrett Wollman said:
> Just for completeness, I did one final run of HINT with just `-O'
> specified (our usual default). `-O' results in significantly better
> integer performance than `-O4'. (Floating-point performance is just
> the opposite.)
>
> This suggests t
Hi,
Don't know, but have a look a vinum instead, a much better solution.
/Jesper
On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 07:12:59PM +0200, Sune Stjerneby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am I correct in the assumption that CCD and the new ATA/ATAPI subsystem
> is a bad combination? It won't let me configure ccd0 when using th
On Tue, 25 May 1999, W Gerald Hicks wrote:
> [snips]
> > device pcm0 at nexus?
> .
> .
> .
> > # cd /dev
> > # rm audio dsp dspW mixer
> > # ./MAKEDEV snd0
>
> > But play (from ports) can't work...
>
> That should be snd1 for the pcm driver
# cd /dev
# rm audio dsp dspW mixer
# ./MAKE
Hi,
Am I correct in the assumption that CCD and the new ATA/ATAPI subsystem
is a bad combination? It won't let me configure ccd0 when using the adx
rather than wdx syntax..
// Sune Stjerneby
{Herfoelge, Denmark, EU}
-- "Go, Go, DECzilla!"
-- "Berkeley UNIX: 22 Years on the VAX."
-- http:/
ARGH! Trim the reply list next time Jerry...
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
[snips]
> device pcm0 at nexus?
.
.
.
> # cd /dev
> # rm audio dsp dspW mixer
> # ./MAKEDEV snd0
> But play (from ports) can't work...
That should be snd1 for the pcm driver
Good Luck,
Jerry Hicks
wghi...@bellsouth.net
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscr
Hello!
I install new SB card to my computer & configure kernel with
follwing string, describing SB 128 PCI:
device pcm0 at nexus?
and got this messages after reboot:
es0: irq 5 at device 11.0 on pci0
pcm0: using I/O space register mapping at 0xe800
o...@ozz$ cat /dev/sndstat
FreeBS
Just for completeness, I did one final run of HINT with just `-O'
specified (our usual default). `-O' results in significantly better
integer performance than `-O4'. (Floating-point performance is just
the opposite.)
This suggests that compiling the world with `-O' levels higher than
one is prob
Since identd and talk have been sandboxed in -current I was wondering if
rpc services could also be sandboxed, or is there something which says
they have to run as root. I'm guessing, but it might be possible to run
the following services with the following privilege.
rstatd kmem
On Mon, May 24, 1999 at 10:46:41PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
>>
>> Someone who would help me driving ppbus, yes. I didn't have enough time
>> last months.
>
>Do you expect that the situation will improve, or do you feel you need
>to hand it over to a new maintainer?
>
The situation shall improve.
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug White [SMTP:dwh...@resnet.uoregon.edu]
> Sent: Sunday, May 23, 1999 2:46 AM
> To: Doug Rabson
> Cc: FreeBSD current Mailing list
> Subject: Re: priorities
>
> On Fri, 21 May 1999, Doug Rabson wrote:
>
> If you've worked on Windows or Macs, you kn
>> SO! Why does "sh MAKEDEV all" NOT make the partition entries for the
>> slice(s) ???
>>
>> ie, "sh MAKEDEV all" only makes the "compatability" slice entries -- da0s1,
>> da0s2 etc.
>
>da0s1 is not a "compatibility slice" entry. That would be da0a, etc.
>
>The problem is that if you made all of
As Wilko Bulte wrote ...
> As Doug Rabson wrote ...
> > On Sat, 15 May 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> >
> > > As Doug Rabson wrote ...
> > > > On Mon, 10 May 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > > After a buildworld of yesterday's -current and a new kernel things
> > > work just fine. As an added bonus the s
On Mon, 24 May 1999, Mike Smith wrote:
> I would add
>
> - Improve ECP/EPP performance if possible.
>
> - Add/finish bidirectional ECP printer support.
Could you also move the source for ppc out of the i386 tree into somewhere
architecture independant. If its ported to new-bus
> Just a thought...
>
> Might it not be logical to put natd in the 'routing daemons' section of
> the boot process? That would start it before things like quota checking,
> which can take a lot of time and prevent a combination worgroup server/NAT
> box from providing network access, even wh
35 matches
Mail list logo
