On Monday, 19 April 1999 at 21:46:30 -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>> integrate newconfig stuff. I hope you have the flexibility
>> to think seriously the integration of newconfig.
>
> As long as it doesn't significantly impact the work already in
> progress, I think the flexibility is certainly
> integrate newconfig stuff. I hope you have the flexibility
> to think seriously the integration of newconfig.
As long as it doesn't significantly impact the work already in
progress, I think the flexibility is certainly there.
> To make the communication more close, it is possible to post
> t
From: Julian Elischer
Subject: Re: HEADS UP Important instructions for -current users!
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 19:59:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:
julian> from my understanding, the biggest difference is that New-bus
julian> is being designed to eventually delegate 'config' to a very minor role
> On Fri, Apr 09, 1999 at 03:52:58PM +0200, Jeremy Lea wrote:
...
> Many people don't seem to understand that FreeBSD can be used for
> workstations as well as servers and Fortran is *essential* on a
> scientific/engineering workstation.
...
Absolutely correct. Some up-and-coming IBM simulation p
from my understanding, the biggest difference is that New-bus
is being designed to eventually delegate 'config' to a very minor role
where newconfig (as it's name suggests' maintains 'config' a s a major
component.. It has been a long standing goal of FreeBSD to make the system
as dynamic as possib
On Mon, 19 Apr 1999, Blaz Zupan wrote:
> I noticed that after the latest round of new-bus changes, my PCI VGA card
> is now recognized as a generic ISA card by the kernel. I don't see any ill
> effects from this, but the new-bus developers may want to know, in case it
> breaks something else.
>
>
On 19-Apr-99 Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
> since I am inexperienced at creating ports, I'll just give instructions on
> how to get the latest linux x11amp to work. First, it won't work with
> voxware, only pcm or OSS. other than that, here are the instructions:
What does it use that pcm and OS
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Tobin [mailto:rich...@cogsci.ed.ac.uk]
> Sent: 19 April 1999 23:59
> To: p...@originative.co.uk; freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG;
> freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
> Subject: RE: lnc0: broke for us between 3.1 and 4.0?
>
>
> > > lnc0: Memory allocated above 16M
> > lnc0: Memory allocated above 16Mb limit
> I've just committed a fix for this. It was caused by the change to the way
> vm_page.c allocates memory
Is this fix going into stable? (I'm a little surprised that such a
change was considered appropriate for the stable branch in the first
place.)
-
On Mon, 19 Apr 1999, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> Insert your e-mail message in your web page under a section titled such as
> Project Status.
Good idea.
> What specifically is needed in the driver to unplug and plug a device?
attach is straightforward.
detach requires:
- disconnect function
since I am inexperienced at creating ports, I'll just give instructions on
how to get the latest linux x11amp to work. First, it won't work with
voxware, only pcm or OSS. other than that, here are the instructions:
Well, there isn't that much to updating the port. I guess the linux_lib
port needs
Just make a port :-)
- Original Message -
From: Kenneth Wayne Culver
To:
Sent: 19. april 1999 23:33
Subject: x11amp 0.9beta1.1 for linux
> just in case anyone would like to know, I have gotten x11amp 0.9beta1.1
> for linux working on my FreeBSD-CURRENT cvsupped as of last night. If
>
> just in case anyone would like to know, I have gotten x11amp 0.9beta1.1
> for linux working on my FreeBSD-CURRENT cvsupped as of last night. If
> anyone would like instructions on how I did this, please email me.
Sure!
Are you planning on updating the port? If not, I'll do the grunt work
for y
Hi,
I have an Asus P2B-D with 2 PII/350, 128Mb Ram with FreeBSD 3.1R installed.
I just added the SMP lines to the generic kernel and I am having constant
reboots.
I am trying to upgrade to 4.0-current and I updated my source tree tonight
around 17:30 UTC but "make world" gives me errors, at diff
I would like that. Is it a port, or is it a linux compat thing?
On Mon, Apr 19, 1999 at 05:33:28PM -0400, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
> just in case anyone would like to know, I have gotten x11amp 0.9beta1.1
> for linux working on my FreeBSD-CURRENT cvsupped as of last night. If
> anyone would lik
Before I do a send-pr, I wanted to see if anyone else was having
problems with newbus and pccardd.
I've got a a 3COM/Megahertz 3CXM556 modem (sio1) and a Xircom 10/100
ethernet card (xe0).
Doing a "make world" and then building a new kernel (with appropriate
changes for newbus) renders the modem
just in case anyone would like to know, I have gotten x11amp 0.9beta1.1
for linux working on my FreeBSD-CURRENT cvsupped as of last night. If
anyone would like instructions on how I did this, please email me.
Kenneth Culver
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe fr
Insert your e-mail message in your web page under a section titled such as
Project Status.
What specifically is needed in the driver to unplug and plug a device?
>
> Currently we have the following:
>
> - working drivers for keyboards, mice, hubs
> - usable driver for USB Zip driv
Currently we have the following:
- working drivers for keyboards, mice, hubs
- usable driver for USB Zip drive (Iomega, SCSI) (any
coders/testers (the true combination) welcome)
I am currently finishing the initial workings of the Zip driver and have
been able to MSDOS fo
Redirected to -current...
I seem to recollect that you were having problems in handling interrupts so
were are
you at with this problem..
>
> Unplug a few devices and you will have the opportunity to review the
> devices probed in your machine (reboot).
>
> I've only removed the list
Hi:
Sorry for my lack of clarity. What I meant was that we DO need control
on the cvsup updates. I am perfectly happy with the way the FreeBSD team
runs the show.
Rick
- Original Message -
From: Wilko Bulte
To: Rick Whitesel
Cc: ; ; ;
; ; ;
Sent: Monday, April 19, 1999 2:12 PM
Subj
FYI.
The recent commit to move sys/sys/lkm.h to the attic breaks
"make world" is sys/module/joy.
1.19 Mon Apr 19 14:19:52 1999 UTC by peter
CVS Tags: HEAD
Diffs to 1.18
FILE REMOVED
Zap LKM option and support. Farewell old friend.
--
Steve
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.
Russell Cattelan wrote:
> I haven't been able to track down exactly where this
> is occuring, but disabling pcm allows eliminates the crash.
>
> The build is current as of Sun 18th.
>
> The one strange thing about this box, it has
> two sounds cards. A build in Yamaha OPL-3 (really really crappy)
I noticed that after the latest round of new-bus changes, my PCI VGA card
is now recognized as a generic ISA card by the kernel. I don't see any ill
effects from this, but the new-bus developers may want to know, in case it
breaks something else.
The VGA card is a S3 Trio64V+. Here's the dmesg out
In message <19990419143825.13fe01...@spinner.netplex.com.au> Peter Wemm writes:
: I'll bet you've got two 'psm0' lines in the config file..
I got the same error when I had two psm devices in my kernel.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current"
As Rick Whitesel wrote ...
> Hi:
> Just wanted to say that I think the lack of a free-for-all CVS is
> exactly what is required to consistently move FreeBSD forward. If someone
Free-for-all as in 'everybody can do commits' ?
This is a joke I hope. There already exists such a thing. It is call
--- Blind-Carbon-Copy
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98
To: Peter Wemm , d...@freebsd.org
Cc: s...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: HEADS UP Important instructions for -current users!
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 17 Apr 1999 05:30:41 +0800."
<19990416213043.95c7b1...@spinner
> This is not happening for the maddr stuff.
> I suspect this would do better:
>
> if (portsize > 0)
> isa_set_portsize(dev, portsize);
> if (dvp->id_iobase >= 0)
> isa_set_port(dev,
As Warner Losh wrote ...
> In message <199904181923.naa25...@mt.sri.com> Nate Williams writes:
> : This is wonderful, but has this ever happened in our mailing lists? I
> : guess I don't remember anyone *ever* ridiculing or harassing someone for
> : not being fluent in the language.
>
> I have se
John Hay wrote:
[..]
> Apr 19 19:22:28 orca /kernel.doug: ppc0: interrupting at irq 7
> Apr 19 19:22:28 orca /kernel.doug: ed0 at port 0x280-0x29f on isa0
> Apr 19 19:22:28 orca /kernel.doug: ed0: address 00:00:c0:1d:43:db, type SMC82
16/
> SMC8216C (16 bit)
> Apr 19 19:22:28 orca /kernel.doug
subscribe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> >
> > I ave found one more thing that seems to be broken. I have used the
> > irq "autodetect" feature of the ed(4) for a long time, but it seems
> > that the newbus compatability shim is not doing the right thing
> > with it. My kernel config file have a line like this:
> >
> > device ed0 at
> All 'source code' control is guarded by a certain group of people in
> *every* project, and FreeBSD is no different. It just has different
> folks guarding it, who have different standards and requirements.
Perhaps a good step towards understanding would be if those
"guarding" the process would
On Mon, 19 Apr 1999 18:17:05 +0900, Tomoaki NISHIYAMA wrote:
> By the way, how can I subscribe new-bus mailing list?
> It does not seem to be controlled by majord...@freebsd.org.
I took "HEADS UP" out of the Subject to help the guy who maintains
src/UPDATING . :-)
You can subscribe to the list
Hi:
Just wanted to say that I think the lack of a free-for-all CVS is
exactly what is required to consistently move FreeBSD forward. If someone
feels they would like to take a different approach, then I say by all means
do so. If you can convince people to join your development effort then
grea
> FreeBSD is somewhat of a closed development enviroment what
> some organizations do is that they maintain their own cvs repository.
FreeBSD is no more closed than "linux" is, which is touted as the most
open development project that exists.
Joe Average person can no more commit can't commit co
FreeBSD is somewhat of a closed development enviroment what
some organizations do is that they maintain their own cvs repository.
CVS repository is guarded by the core members and only "certified"
committers are allowed to commit code that in addition to not having
a procedure or a processs to mi
> > I saw this and just had to note something to you. THINK what branch you
> > are using. This is _WHERE_ things are being aired publically, and merged
> > eventually to the STABLE branch.
>
> Gosh, thank you, without your wonderful help and understanding, I NEVER
> would have been able to realize
> And then what about newconfig? To me this just adds more truth to the
> whole /. argument that *BSD promotes a closed development model.
It's a flawed argument and one that doesn't acknowledge, at least in
the case of FreeBSD, the existence of publicly accessible CVS repositories
along with the
I supped my system at 990417. Then I make world and rebuild
sysinstall. The command /stand/sysinstall crash my system during probe
hard disk.
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x31
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
instructi
Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
> I followed the instructions about NEXUS to rebuild my kernel, and it
> now it won't compile. It gets all the way through the compile, and then
> gives these errors.
I'll bet you've got two 'psm0' lines in the config file..
All that config is doing now is basically co
I followed the instructions about NEXUS to rebuild my kernel, and it
now it won't compile. It gets all the way through the compile, and then
gives these errors.
generating linker set emulation glue for ELF
cc -c -O -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing
-prototypes
In message <19990419124505.62d951...@spinner.netplex.com.au>, Peter Wemm wrote:
>Never mind, I understand now. :-)
Ok, I think I also understand.
The DRIVER_MODULE() macro is consist for static configuration to kick
module initialization routine for every driver.Is it correct?
But are ther more
Peter Wemm wrote:
> Doug Rabson wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Apr 1999, Takanori Watanabe wrote:
> >
> > > In message
> , Do
> > > ug Rabson wrote:
> > > >On Mon, 19 Apr 1999 takaw...@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp wrote:
> > > >> Simple Question.
> > > >> If there were 'Closed'-Host-Controller-I
Let me try to post an example to see whether I understood your question:
Let's assume we have a motherboard with an ISA NHCI (new host controller
interface) apart from the standard PCI UHCI (Universal Host Controller
Interface, Intel) available in the 82371AB chipset.
We boot the system, the UH
Brian Feldman wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Apr 1999, Ilya Naumov wrote:
>
> >
> > i have compiled the latest kernel and encountered a problem with IPDIVERT.
even
> > with "options IPDIVERT" string in kernel config, kernel says the following:
> >
> > IP packet filtering initialized, divert disabled,
Doug Rabson wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Apr 1999, Takanori Watanabe wrote:
>
> > In message
, Do
> > ug Rabson wrote:
> > >On Mon, 19 Apr 1999 takaw...@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp wrote:
> > >> Simple Question.
> > >> If there were 'Closed'-Host-Controller-Interface with object-only driver
On Mon, 19 Apr 1999, Ilya Naumov wrote:
>
> i have compiled the latest kernel and encountered a problem with IPDIVERT.
> even
> with "options IPDIVERT" string in kernel config, kernel says the following:
>
> IP packet filtering initialized, divert disabled, rule-based forwarding
> disabled, lo
> Hi,
>
> I ave found one more thing that seems to be broken. I have used the
> irq "autodetect" feature of the ed(4) for a long time, but it seems
> that the newbus compatability shim is not doing the right thing
> with it. My kernel config file have a line like this:
>
> device ed0 at isa? por
> One problem on the decision is that it was not based
> on a judge that new-bus is technically or philosophically
> superior to newconfig framework but you stated
I don't think they're so far apart that there's a "clear" superiority,
and we certainly didn't get that impression from any of the
dis
i have compiled the latest kernel and encountered a problem with IPDIVERT. even
with "options IPDIVERT" string in kernel config, kernel says the following:
IP packet filtering initialized, divert disabled, rule-based forwarding
disabled, logging disabled
of course, firewall rules like "add dive
> Simple Question.
> If there were 'Closed'-Host-Controller-Interface with object-only driver,
> Can the vendor make the Host controller recognized without changing
> usb.c code?
If he exports a USB bus with the appropriate methods, he will be able to
drop it in, yes. You might have noticed
jkh> > I don't go to new-bus, this direction is disunion of BSDs. It is
jkh> > bad decision.
jkh>
jkh> I'm sorry that you feel this way, but I can only re-state that better
jkh> communication could have prevented this in the first place and hope
jkh> that you've learned your own lessons from this
On Mon, 19 Apr 1999, Takanori Watanabe wrote:
> In message ,
> Do
> ug Rabson wrote:
> >On Mon, 19 Apr 1999 takaw...@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp wrote:
> >> Simple Question.
> >> If there were 'Closed'-Host-Controller-Interface with object-only driver,
> >> Can the vendor make the Host con
imp> Let us not forget that much of the newconfig work can be used with
imp> newconfig shims in the newbus scheme.
If you are to construct a newconfig shim in the new-bus scheme,
it means that you'll have two interface to device drivers.
Then, you should consider, whether it is better to make a
In message , Do
ug Rabson wrote:
>On Mon, 19 Apr 1999 takaw...@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp wrote:
>> Simple Question.
>> If there were 'Closed'-Host-Controller-Interface with object-only driver,
>> Can the vendor make the Host controller recognized without changing
>> usb.c code?
>>
>> #T
On Sun, 18 Apr 1999, John Hay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I ave found one more thing that seems to be broken. I have used the
> irq "autodetect" feature of the ed(4) for a long time, but it seems
> that the newbus compatability shim is not doing the right thing
> with it. My kernel config file have a line
On Mon, 19 Apr 1999 takaw...@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp wrote:
> In message , Nick
> Hibm
> a wrote:
> >> Why would I say it wasn't ready? Because outside of core (apparently),
> >> nobody was warned/told that this was going to be committed in a few
> >> days/hours/minutes.
>
> >I've por
58 matches
Mail list logo
