Re: UPDATING needs updating

1999-04-08 Thread Warner Losh
In message <19990408220132.a12...@netmonger.net> Christopher Masto writes: : Not very useful to tell people about the first major compiler change : in years? It may not break "make world", but it certainly breaks : things like C++ library compatability and a large part of the ports : collection. :

Re: CPP broken on egcs current

1999-04-08 Thread Warner Losh
In message <19990408122607.a19...@nuxi.com> "David O'Brien" writes: : > ===> rpcsvc : > rpcgen -C -h -DWANT_NFS3 /home/imp/FreeBSD/src/include/rpcsvc/key_prot.x -o key_prot.h : > /home/imp/FreeBSD/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cpp/../../../../contrib/egcs/gcc/cccp.c:1882: Internal compiler error in functio

Re: UPDATING needs updating

1999-04-08 Thread Warner Losh
In message <19990408142419.a24...@netmonger.net> Christopher Masto writes: : Mightn't it be a good idea to mention the egcs move in /usr/src/UPDATING? I suppose. What should we say about it? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the bod

Re: EGCS troubles

1999-04-08 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
On 08-Apr-99 David O'Brien wrote: >> > Something broken in new egcs c++ compiler - jade doesn't work with >> > following symptoms (checked on two machines). >> >> Apr 7 20:26:04 daemon /kernel: pid 61135 (jade), uid 0: exited on >> signal >> 11 (core dumped) >> >> Verified... >> >> David, might

Re: ATTENTION PLEASE: g77 in base system.

1999-04-08 Thread Steve Kargl
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > "David O'Brien" writes: > > I've only heard back from 4 folks about adding EGCS's g77 to the base > > system -- all 4 said "yes". Unless I get more feedback, I will add g77 > > to the base system this weekend. > > I beg your pardon? You're adding g77 to the system be

Re: ATTENTION PLEASE: g77 in base system.

1999-04-08 Thread Steve Kargl
Satoshi - the Ports Wraith - Asami wrote: > * From: "David O'Brien" > > * I've only heard back from 4 folks about adding EGCS's g77 to the base > * system -- all 4 said "yes". Unless I get more feedback, I will add g77 > * to the base system this weekend. > > Sorry, I wasn't paying enough a

Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os

1999-04-08 Thread Bruce Albrecht
Chuck Robey writes: > If that were true, but it's not. Older versions of the config files and > libraries can very easily cause the ports to fail to build. Every time > I upgrade stuff, I have to go about doing search and destroy on old > stuff. On top of that, there are various mistakes in

RE: CD Mount Troubles

1999-04-08 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 09-Apr-99 Rod Taylor wrote: > My Joliet formated cd's aren't mounting with the Joliet extensions. I > believe I saw that FreeBSD supported these extensions. I'm mounting > mostly recorded cds, in older nec cdrom drives. (OS/2 mounts joliet > extensions fine on same machine). There are p

Re: ATTENTION PLEASE: g77 in base system.

1999-04-08 Thread Brian Handy
On 9 Apr 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: >> [4 people said "YES! Add g77!"] >I beg your pardon? You're adding g77 to the system because you know of >four people who would find it useful? Where's the logic in that? Well, statistically speaking, that's a bunch of "ayes" and no "noes". Lots of th

PPP problems in -CURRENT

1999-04-08 Thread GuRu
cvsupped, built CURRENT as of April 8th, upgrading a 3.1-STABLE system to 4.0. A reboot later, all seems fine, except that I'm experiencing severe problems connecting to my ISP. Everything goes well till after the login phase, when entering the lcp negotiation phase, then things get FUBARed. (pas

CD Mount Troubles

1999-04-08 Thread Rod Taylor
My Joliet formated cd's aren't mounting with the Joliet extensions. I believe I saw that FreeBSD supported these extensions. I'm mounting mostly recorded cds, in older nec cdrom drives. (OS/2 mounts joliet extensions fine on same machine). Some disks done mount at all, and are complained about.

make world breakage?!?

1999-04-08 Thread Brian Feldman
Am I the only one to get this error?? cc -nostdinc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/amd/amd/../../../contrib/amd/amd -I. -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/amd/amd -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/amd/amd/../include -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/amd/amd/../../../contrib/amd/include -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/amd/amd/../../../contrib/amd -DHAVE

Re: msdosfs problems?

1999-04-08 Thread Jake
> I've got all my mp3s stored on my fat16 partition so I can easily share > them between Win98 and fbsd. However recently mpg123 has been complaining > about once valid mp3s: Hmm, odd, I'm doing exactly the same thing and have never had any problems. I play them from a 3 gig FAT16 partition with

Re: emacs* broken in -current (was Re: Vtable thunks with egcs)

1999-04-08 Thread Joel Ray Holveck
> You are absolutely right. I just tried the new version of emacs > that I built on my pre-egcs box and it doesn't work on that box > either. This definitely doesn't appear to be anything caused by > changing to egcs. Not that it matters much but for grins I just > built/installed the xemacs por

Re: -jN make world

1999-04-08 Thread Joel Ray Holveck
> I think I may have fixed the problem in the Makefile... well I might have > fixed another smaller problem, but it is now more broken than before and > -jN should work. If it's not yet fixed, why don't we add something to the buildworld target that checks MAKEFLAGS for -j and issues an error or w

ports dependencies (Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os)

1999-04-08 Thread Satoshi - the Ports Wraith - Asami
I'm just skimming through this discussion, as I don't have time to read them all. People, I know you are annoyed by many stupid things software authors have done in the past to make your life miserable (and believe me, I probably have more horror stories than most of you), but can you trim those b

Re: UPDATING needs updating

1999-04-08 Thread Christopher Masto
On Fri, Apr 09, 1999 at 03:54:27AM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > > On Thu, 08 Apr 1999 14:24:19 -0400, Christopher Masto wrote: > > > Mightn't it be a good idea to mention the egcs move in /usr/src/UPDATING? > > Now that both bootstrapping and -j8 seem to be working, it wouldn't be > very use

Re: ATTENTION PLEASE: g77 in base system.

1999-04-08 Thread Satoshi - the Ports Wraith - Asami
* From: "David O'Brien" * I've only heard back from 4 folks about adding EGCS's g77 to the base * system -- all 4 said "yes". Unless I get more feedback, I will add g77 * to the base system this weekend. Sorry, I wasn't paying enough attention I guess. What's wrong with it being a port? I

CAM changes causing prob?

1999-04-08 Thread Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS Tensor Perth
After the last lot of CAM changes, I occasionally get processes hanging attempting to access my QIC-525 tape drive. They can't be killed, so doing backups can be a mite troublesome. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. There seems to be some relation to how recently the last lot of tape act

Re: Panic: Invalid longjmp with vinum configured by novice

1999-04-08 Thread Greg Lehey
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html] On Friday, 9 April 1999 at 0:35:07 +0200, Michael Reifenberger wrote: > Hi, > I often get to above message while trying to configure vinum. > Trying the examples from the manpage works, of course. > Next try. > What I want to d

Re: ATTENTION PLEASE: g77 in base system.

1999-04-08 Thread Joe Abley
On Fri, Apr 09, 1999 at 03:16:41AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > "David O'Brien" writes: > > I've only heard back from 4 folks about adding EGCS's g77 to the base > > system -- all 4 said "yes". Unless I get more feedback, I will add g77 > > to the base system this weekend. > > I beg your

Re: ATTENTION PLEASE: g77 in base system.

1999-04-08 Thread Chuck Robey
On 9 Apr 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > "David O'Brien" writes: > > I've only heard back from 4 folks about adding EGCS's g77 to the base > > system -- all 4 said "yes". Unless I get more feedback, I will add g77 > > to the base system this weekend. > > I beg your pardon? You're adding g77

Re: ATTENTION PLEASE: g77 in base system.

1999-04-08 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
"David O'Brien" writes: > I've only heard back from 4 folks about adding EGCS's g77 to the base > system -- all 4 said "yes". Unless I get more feedback, I will add g77 > to the base system this weekend. I beg your pardon? You're adding g77 to the system because you know of four people who would

Re: ATTENTION PLEASE: g77 in base system.

1999-04-08 Thread Glenn Johnson
On Thu, Apr 08, 1999 at 04:50:56PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > I've only heard back from 4 folks about adding EGCS's g77 to the base > system -- all 4 said "yes". Unless I get more feedback, I will add g77 > to the base system this weekend. > > -- > -- David(obr...@nuxi.com -or- obr...@f

Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os

1999-04-08 Thread Chuck Robey
On Fri, 9 Apr 1999, Peter Jeremy wrote: > Chuck Robey wrote: > >Don't forget, with all the gnome and gtk ports (and the kde things) > > tcl and tk also install various version-specific information (and has > anyone else noticed that tk depends on X11 (ie XFree86) and the > XFree86 configuration

Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os

1999-04-08 Thread Jacques Vidrine
I get the feeling (not for the first time) that perhaps it is a mistake to have the package database indexed by PKGNAME. Or at least, it seems that there isn't an easy way to get from what I'll refer to as the ``port name'' from PKGNAME. For example, the port gtk12 was once gtk-1.2.0. Now it i

Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os

1999-04-08 Thread Jacques Vidrine
On 8 April 1999 at 19:57, Chuck Robey wrote: > Don't forget, with all the gnome and gtk ports (and the kde things) > there are various files with "config" in their names, that a bunch of > other ports depend on ... just to add confusion, and the rules for these > dependencies aren't as cut and dri

Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os

1999-04-08 Thread Jacques Vidrine
On 8 April 1999 at 19:25, Chuck Robey wrote: [snip] > And on top of that, there are about 5 top tracks of libs, each of these > 5 tracks (that have lots depending on them) has lived in both /usr/local > and in /usr/X11R6 in recent times, both leave ascii configuration files > behind (and in both

Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os

1999-04-08 Thread Peter Jeremy
John Fieber wrote: >For an update to work, files that must be preserved (shared >libraries mainly) over an update must be tagged. This is why I said my approach only worked for `minor' updates - which means those that don't bump library versions etc (eg XFree86-3.3.3 to XFree86-3.3.3.1). > If l

msdosfs problems?

1999-04-08 Thread Alex Zepeda
I've got all my mp3s stored on my fat16 partition so I can easily share them between Win98 and fbsd. However recently mpg123 has been complaining about once valid mp3s: zippy:~/mp3s#mpg123 -b10240 U2/U2\ -\ Sunday\ Bloody\ Sunday.mp3 High Performance MPEG 1.0/2.0/2.5 Audio Player for Layer 1, 2 a

Re: ATTENTION PLEASE: g77 in base system.

1999-04-08 Thread Chuck Robey
On Thu, 8 Apr 1999, David O'Brien wrote: > I've only heard back from 4 folks about adding EGCS's g77 to the base > system -- all 4 said "yes". Unless I get more feedback, I will add g77 > to the base system this weekend. Personally, yes, lets do it. In fact, I'd like to hear serious discussion,

Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os

1999-04-08 Thread Chuck Robey
On Thu, 8 Apr 1999, John Fieber wrote: > On Fri, 9 Apr 1999, Peter Jeremy wrote: > > > There's no mechanism for updating a package - and it's not clear (to > > me anyway) how this can be done safely in a general way. Where the > > update is only minor (and won't affect the dependent packages), y

Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os

1999-04-08 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, 9 Apr 1999, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On installation, the packages database stores both dependency > directions. /var/db/pkg//+CONTENTS contains the list of > pre-requisite packages in `...@pkgdep' records. The +CONTENTS file is > part of the package. /var/db/pkg//+REQUIRED_BY contains the

ATTENTION PLEASE: g77 in base system.

1999-04-08 Thread David O'Brien
I've only heard back from 4 folks about adding EGCS's g77 to the base system -- all 4 said "yes". Unless I get more feedback, I will add g77 to the base system this weekend. -- -- David(obr...@nuxi.com -or- obr...@freebsd.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsu

Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os

1999-04-08 Thread John Fieber
On Fri, 9 Apr 1999, Peter Jeremy wrote: > There's no mechanism for updating a package - and it's not clear (to > me anyway) how this can be done safely in a general way. Where the > update is only minor (and won't affect the dependent packages), you > can use something like: For an update to wor

Re: EGCS troubles

1999-04-08 Thread David O'Brien
> > Something broken in new egcs c++ compiler - jade doesn't work with > > following symptoms (checked on two machines). > > Apr 7 20:26:04 daemon /kernel: pid 61135 (jade), uid 0: exited on signal > 11 (core dumped) > > Verified... > > David, might this be due to the compiler itself of the lib

Re: make world breakage

1999-04-08 Thread David O'Brien
> > It seems Snob Art Genre wrote: > > > > Dont use -jN on the make world, that broke with the EGCS import. > > Soren, (if we know) is it the build of egcs (in whole or part) or is it > the effect of using egcs, that's broken the rest of the -j build? The build of egcs. ``cd src/gnu/usr.bin/cc

Re: -jN make world

1999-04-08 Thread David O'Brien
> Still broken here at v1.23. Luoqi's patch against v1.21 works though Please try rev 1.24 of src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/Makefile. -- -- David(obr...@nuxi.com -or- obr...@freebsd.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of t

Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os

1999-04-08 Thread Chas Pinckard
Suggestion: How bout a version detection flag for the update pkgs and a version requirement to the newly built ports? C~P Peter Jeremy wrote: > Tom Bartol wrote: > >ports/package database system but it occurred to me that perhaps the > >database is currently only storing which packages a given

Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os

1999-04-08 Thread Chuck Robey
On Thu, 8 Apr 1999, John Polstra wrote: > Jacques Vidrine wrote: > > > > Maintainers of these ports would appreciate PRs if the dependencies > > are broken. The ports infrastructure has the mechanisms necessary to > > handle these dependencies, but the port maintainer may not catch > > every dep

Re: port dependencies (was Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os)

1999-04-08 Thread Tom Bartol
On Thu, 8 Apr 1999, Jacques Vidrine wrote: > On 8 April 1999 at 12:24, John Polstra wrote: > [snip] > > Say you've got a bunch of ports that all depend on the same shared > > library -- maybe libjpeg or libXpm. You've had them installed for > > a few months, and they all work fine. Now you de

Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os

1999-04-08 Thread Peter Jeremy
Tom Bartol wrote: >ports/package database system but it occurred to me that perhaps the >database is currently only storing which packages a given package depends >upon and is NOT storing which packages depend upon a given >package The port source tree stores a list of pre-requisite packages in e

emacs* broken in -current (was Re: Vtable thunks with egcs)

1999-04-08 Thread Steve Price
You are absolutely right. I just tried the new version of emacs that I built on my pre-egcs box and it doesn't work on that box either. This definitely doesn't appear to be anything caused by changing to egcs. Not that it matters much but for grins I just built/installed the xemacs port and it _

Panic: Invalid longjmp with vinum configured by novice

1999-04-08 Thread Michael Reifenberger
Hi, I often get to above message while trying to configure vinum. Trying the examples from the manpage works, of course. Next try. What I want to do: First creating a non mirrored but striped volume and later add one mirror plex. I do: # vinum start # vinum resetconfig ... # cat x drive d1 device

port dependencies (was Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os)

1999-04-08 Thread Jacques Vidrine
On 8 April 1999 at 12:24, John Polstra wrote: [snip] > Say you've got a bunch of ports that all depend on the same shared > library -- maybe libjpeg or libXpm. You've had them installed for > a few months, and they all work fine. Now you decide to upgrade > one of them, the "foo" port. Oops, it

Re: Vtable thunks with egcs

1999-04-08 Thread Peter Jeremy
Steve Price wrote: >The one I'm fretting over right now is emacs. I haven't quite >figured out why, but invoking it brings up the window, but never >displays anything in the window. Using a version built with the >old compiler doesn't seem to make any difference. :( I submitted ports/10783 cove

Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os

1999-04-08 Thread Tom Bartol
On Thu, 8 Apr 1999, John Polstra wrote: > > I am not saying the dependencies are broken. I'm just lamenting the > general problem that it's difficult to upgrade a port that depends on > a lot of things. It's a general structural problem, and I don't know > how to fix it. > > Say you've got a

Re: CPP broken on egcs current

1999-04-08 Thread David O'Brien
> ===> rpcsvc > rpcgen -C -h -DWANT_NFS3 /home/imp/FreeBSD/src/include/rpcsvc/key_prot.x -o > key_prot.h > /home/imp/FreeBSD/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cpp/../../../../contrib/egcs/gcc/cccp.c:1882: > Internal compiler error in function main What rev of contrib/egcs/gcc/config/freebsd.h do you have? --

Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os

1999-04-08 Thread John Polstra
Jacques Vidrine wrote: > > Maintainers of these ports would appreciate PRs if the dependencies > are broken. The ports infrastructure has the mechanisms necessary to > handle these dependencies, but the port maintainer may not catch > every dependency. I am not saying the dependencies are broken

Re: -jN make world

1999-04-08 Thread Bob Bishop
At 9:44 am -0700 8/4/99, David O'Brien wrote: >I think I may have fixed the problem in the Makefile... well I might have >fixed another smaller problem, but it is now more broken than before and >-jN should work. > >Please give it a try and let me know. Still broken here at v1.23. Luoqi's patch ag

Re: f77 not working.

1999-04-08 Thread Steve Kargl
Jim Bryant wrote: > > I attempted to run some fortran benchmarks to see the improvement that > egcs gives with the pentium opts... > > 1:56:13pm argus(57): f77 [flags elided] -o pitest.mx=14 pi4.f mp.f > cc: pi4.f: Fortran compiler not installed on this system > cc: mp.f: Fortran compiler not i

Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os

1999-04-08 Thread Jacques Vidrine
On 8 April 1999 at 11:49, John Polstra wrote: [snip] > Everything works fine for the initial installation. But now 3 months > later you want to upgrade to the new version. About the only reliable > way to do that is to manually track down all the dependencies, > pkg_delete every one of them, and

Re: /etc/hosts.allow

1999-04-08 Thread Mark Murray
Christopher Masto wrote: > Why are we installing a hosts.allow with live entries in it? Why are > we allowing the people at mydomain.com (MyInternet Services in > Seattle) access to sendmail, while blocking the currently-non-existant > d00d.org and spamnest.org from various services? No problem;

f77 not working.

1999-04-08 Thread Jim Bryant
I attempted to run some fortran benchmarks to see the improvement that egcs gives with the pentium opts... 1:56:13pm argus(57): f77 -O2 -mpentium -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -o pitest.mx=14 pi4.f mp.f cc: pi4.f: Fortran compiler not installed on this system cc: mp.f: Fortran compiler not instal

Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os

1999-04-08 Thread John Polstra
Alex Zepeda wrote: > On Thu, 8 Apr 1999, Chuck Robey wrote: > >> When Satoshi builds stuff, it's in a real clean environment, but in >> fact, all the gnome and kde ports are extraordinarly sensitive to >> stuff from older ports hanging around. That's why folks are wary of >> upgrading those guys.

Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os

1999-04-08 Thread Alex Zepeda
On Thu, 8 Apr 1999, Chuck Robey wrote: > When Satoshi builds stuff, it's in a real clean environment, but in > fact, all the gnome and kde ports are extraordinarly sensitive to > stuff from older ports hanging around. That's why folks are wary of > upgrading those guys. That's news to me. Perha

Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os

1999-04-08 Thread Brian Feldman
On Thu, 8 Apr 1999, Bruce Evans wrote: > >> Actually, they don't. Compiler-specific options can be put in ${CC}. > >> Perhaps they even should be. > > > >But in this case, we want "-Os" (egcs) or "-O2" (gcc) only for > >building boot -- not for everything. It could be parameterized with > >make

UPDATING needs updating

1999-04-08 Thread Christopher Masto
Mightn't it be a good idea to mention the egcs move in /usr/src/UPDATING? -- Christopher Masto Senior Network Monkey NetMonger Communications ch...@netmonger.neti...@netmonger.nethttp://www.netmonger.net Free yourself, free your machine, free the daemon -- http://www.

Re: make world breakage

1999-04-08 Thread Chuck Robey
On Thu, 8 Apr 1999, Soren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Snob Art Genre wrote: > > Dont use -jN on the make world, that broke with the EGCS import. Soren, (if we know) is it the build of egcs (in whole or part) or is it the effect of using egcs, that's broken the rest of the -j build? > > > Trying

Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os

1999-04-08 Thread Warner Losh
In message Alex Zepeda writes: : That was one of the BIG pitfalls of egcs, binary incompatable C++ programs : and libs. Sounds like you're overdue for your favorite shot of caffiene. g++ and its derivitives have never been binary compatible for long. I'm aware of at least three ABI breakagese s

Re: CPP broken on egcs current

1999-04-08 Thread Warner Losh
In message <199904081734.laa54...@harmony.village.org> Warner Losh writes: : I'm getting cpp internal error, and I know I have a mkstemps in my : libc. I did rebuild cpp w/o any hacks and reinstalled it from the latest sources, and things seem to be working now (the rpcgen command that was failing

/etc/hosts.allow

1999-04-08 Thread Christopher Masto
Why are we installing a hosts.allow with live entries in it? Why are we allowing the people at mydomain.com (MyInternet Services in Seattle) access to sendmail, while blocking the currently-non-existant d00d.org and spamnest.org from various services? I think it would make sense to have "sample"

Re: CPP broken on egcs current

1999-04-08 Thread Warner Losh
In message <19990405130529.h22...@nuxi.com> "David O'Brien" writes: : Thinking about it... some people might need to build libc to get one with : mkstemp() in it. Of course that is hard to do if `cpp' is totally : broken. If this is the case, people can try adding "SRCS += mkstemp.c" : to src/gnu

RE: EGCS troubles

1999-04-08 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
On 08-Apr-99 Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Hi, > > While this problem might not belongs to this list however it is > difficult in this case to distinguish exactly. > > Something broken in new egcs c++ compiler - jade doesn't work with > following symptoms (checked on two machines). Apr 7 20:26:04 daem

Re: Vtable thunks with egcs

1999-04-08 Thread Steve Price
On Tue, 6 Apr 1999, David O'Brien wrote: # > I'm assuming that the default for egcs uses vtable thunks instead of # > offsets in the vtable to handle multiple inheritance. # # At the moment, yes. # # > It occurred to me that since this changes the C++ calling convention, # > we have to bump the

Re: EGCS troubles

1999-04-08 Thread David O'Brien
> eebsd.dsl -t sgml handbook.sgml > *** Signal 11 > > Interesting that when it was compiled using pgcc port it worked just > fine. Then it would probably do fine using the EGCS Port. But, the port != /usr/src. The library setup of EGCS in /usr/src is very different than the Port -- -- David

-jN make world

1999-04-08 Thread David O'Brien
I think I may have fixed the problem in the Makefile... well I might have fixed another smaller problem, but it is now more broken than before and -jN should work. Please give it a try and let me know. -- -- David(obr...@nuxi.com -or- obr...@freebsd.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo

Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os

1999-04-08 Thread Chuck Robey
On Wed, 7 Apr 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote: > On Wed, 7 Apr 1999, John Polstra wrote: > > > Chuck Robey wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the clue, John! As much as I hate redoing the KDE and > > > gnome ports, it looks like doing that again ... > > > > I don't blame you. I've never even built them, for

Re: make world breakage

1999-04-08 Thread Snob Art Genre
On Thu, 8 Apr 1999, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Please don't disregard to read rpevious messages from this list! Sorry, I just started running current again the other day, I didn't re-subscribe until last night. > As it was pointed earlier make world now fails if -jN option used. >Try to build withou

Re: make world breakage

1999-04-08 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Please don't disregard to read rpevious messages from this list! As it was pointed earlier make world now fails if -jN option used. Try to build without -j. ? Snob Art Genre wrote: > Trying to make world today and last night, with fairly up-to-the-minute > source, I keep bombing out with: > > `/

Re: make world breakage

1999-04-08 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Snob Art Genre wrote: Dont use -jN on the make world, that broke with the EGCS import. > Trying to make world today and last night, with fairly up-to-the-minute > source, I keep bombing out with: > > `/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/egcs/gcc/config/i386/i386. > md'

make world breakage

1999-04-08 Thread Snob Art Genre
Trying to make world today and last night, with fairly up-to-the-minute source, I keep bombing out with: `/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/egcs/gcc/config/i386/i386. md' is up to date. `genattr.c' is up to date. `gencodes.c' is up to date. `genconfig.c' is up to date. `genemit.

EGCS troubles

1999-04-08 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Hi, While this problem might not belongs to this list however it is difficult in this case to distinguish exactly. Something broken in new egcs c++ compiler - jade doesn't work with following symptoms (checked on two machines). ===> handbook /usr/local/bin/jade -V html-manifest -ioutput.html? -c

EGCS -O2 vs -Os optimisation on kernels

1999-04-08 Thread Maxim Sobolev
It seems that -Os is not wery effective on kernels: -O2: -r-xr-xr-x? 1 root? wheel? 1418829 Apr? 6 16:50 kernel ?? text??? data bss dec hex filename 1044102? 111964? 123592 1279658? 1386aa kernel -Os: -rwxr-xr-x? 1 root? wheel? 1411885 Apr? 8 12:57 kernel ?? text??? data bss d

Re: EGCS

1999-04-08 Thread David O'Brien
> remove /usr/include and build it freshly before doing the above with > > make includes cd /usr/src make -DCLOBBER includes is the perfered method. -- -- David(obr...@nuxi.com -or- obr...@freebsd.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe

[no subject]

1999-04-08 Thread Alexey J. Suvorov
subscribe freebsd-current subscribe cvs-all To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: EGCS

1999-04-08 Thread Andreas Klemm
On Wed, Apr 07, 1999 at 07:17:42PM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > On 07-Apr-99 Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote: > > I can't get a make world to work with egcs. I deleted the whole obj > > directory, and recvsuppped the entire source tree, and it still doesn't > > work. Every time I cvsup I get a