Re: beta gfortran 14.x.y (using -march=native and intrinsic repeat) gives a signal SIGILL

2023-08-11 Thread Jerry D via Fortran
On 8/11/23 5:34 AM, Jorge D'Elia via Fortran wrote: Dear GFortran developers, With the beta gfortran 14.x.y versions we are noticing some runtime errors in a production code. One type of runtime errors is related to the concurrent use of the intrinsic "repeat" when the source code is compiled w

Re: beta gfortran 14.x.y (using -march=native and intrinsic repeat) gives a signal SIGILL

2023-08-12 Thread Jerry D via Fortran
On 8/12/23 6:41 AM, Jorge D'Elia wrote: Hi Paul, - Mensaje original - De: "Paul Richard Thomas" Para: "Jerry" CC: "Jorge D'Elia" , "Gfortran List" , "Jorge D'Elia" Enviado: Sábado, 12 de Agosto 2023 3:56:44 Asunto: Re: beta gfortran 14.x.y (using -march=native and intrinsic repeat)

Re: [PATCH] Fortran: improve bounds checking for DATA with implied-do [PR35095]

2023-08-24 Thread Jerry D via Fortran
On 8/24/23 2:28 PM, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote: Dear all, the attached patch adds stricter bounds-checking for DATA statements with implied-do. I chose to allow overindexing (for arrays of rank greater than 1) for -std=legacy, as there might be codes in the wild that need this (and this is

Re: [PATCH] fortran: fix checking of CHARACTER lengths in array constructors [PR70231]

2023-09-18 Thread Jerry D via Fortran
On 9/18/23 1:27 PM, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote: Dear all, as correctly analyzed by Jerry, the code for checking the consistency of character lengths in array constructors did not properly initialize the auxiliary variable used in "bounds checking". The attached patch resolves this by initi

Re: [Ping^2, Patch, Fortran] PR98301 Re: RANDOM_INIT() and coarray Fortran

2021-05-21 Thread Jerry D via Fortran
yes, please commit On 5/21/21 8:08 AM, Steve Kargl via Fortran wrote: On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 10:09:02AM +0200, Andre Vehreschild wrote: Ping, ping! Please find attached a rebased version of the patch for the RANDOM_INIT issue with coarray Fortran. Nothing changed to the previous version, just

Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 100227, write with implied DO loop

2021-07-05 Thread Jerry D via Fortran
Looks OK Thomas, Good for backport as well. Regards, Jerry On 7/4/21 9:09 AM, Thomas Koenig via Fortran wrote: Hello world, after a bit of an absence, I am now back, at least for some regression fixing (and for reviewing patches, if that is called for). So, here's a regression fix to start

Re: *Ping**2 [Patch] Fortran: Fix bind(C) character length checks

2021-07-16 Thread Jerry D via Fortran
Good to go Tobias. Jerry On 7/14/21 5:50 AM, Burnus, Tobias wrote: Ping**2 On Juli 8, 2021 I wrote: *Ping* I intent to incorporate Sandra's suggestions, except for the beginning of line spacing - that's needed to avoid exceeding the 80 character line limit. I did not include an updated pat

Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/102458 - ICE tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6136

2021-09-23 Thread Jerry D via Fortran
Harald, Looks good. OK and thanks for your time and efforts. Jerry On 9/23/21 12:47 PM, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote: Dear Fortranners, we missed certain intrinsics as being disallowed in constant expressions, which lead to an ICE when these intrinsics were used in a specification expressi

Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/65454 - accept both old and new-style relational operators

2021-10-08 Thread Jerry D via Fortran
On 10/8/21 2:33 PM, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote: Dear Fortranners, F2018:10.1.5.5.1(2) requires the same interpretation of old and new-style relational operators. We internally distinguish between old and new style, but try to map appropriately when used. This mapping was missing when r

Re: *PING* [PATCH] PR fortran/99348, 102521 - ICEs when initializing DT parameter arrays from scalar

2021-10-09 Thread Jerry D via Fortran
This one looks OK.  Sorry I missed it earlier. Thanks again for the patch! Jerry On 10/9/21 12:27 PM, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote: *Ping* Am 03.10.21 um 21:20 schrieb Harald Anlauf via Fortran: Dear Fortranners, when initializing parameter arrays from scalars, we did handle only the case

Re: [PATCH,FORTRAN 28/29] Free type-bound procedure structs

2021-10-29 Thread Jerry D via Fortran
Looks good and simple. Proceed. Thanks Jerry On 10/28/21 5:05 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Fortran wrote: ping [Rebased, re-regtested cleanly. Ok for trunk?] On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 14:57:31 + Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer compiling gfortran.dg/typeboun

Re: [PATCH,FORTRAN 01/29] gdbinit: break on gfc_internal_error

2021-10-29 Thread Jerry D via Fortran
Looks OK. Cheers On 10/29/21 11:58 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Fortran wrote: ping On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 14:57:04 + Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer Aids debugging the fortran FE. gcc/ChangeLog: 2017-11-12 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer * gdbin

Re: ping re F2003 and F2008 standards compliance

2021-11-02 Thread Jerry D via Fortran
Paul, great for getting this posted! I would approve but maybe Sandra should. Regardless, thanks for getting this together. Best Regards, Jerry On 11/2/21 1:18 AM, Paul Richard Thomas via Fortran wrote: Hi Sandra, Some weeks ago Andrew Benson triggered me to recover a patch for finalization

<    1   2   3   4