On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 8:09 AM Thomas Koenig via Gcc wrote:
>
> [For the fortran people: Discussion on gcc@]
>
> Just a general remark.
>
> There are people, such as myself, who regularly mess up
> their git repositories because they have no mental model
> of what git is doing (case in point: The
On 3/4/23, Janne Blomqvist via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 11:31 PM Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Fortran
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Mere cosmetics.
>>
>> - if (foo != NULL)
>> free (foo);
>>
>> With the caveat that coccinelle ruins replacement whitespace or i'm
>> uneducated eno
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 3:53 AM Tobias Burnus wrote:
>
> On 20.08.21 09:34, Richard Biener via Fortran wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 10:10 PM Iain Sandoe wrote:
> >> libm is not needed on Darwin, and should not be added unconditionally
> >> even if that is (mostly) harmless since it is a s
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 5:09 PM Eric Gallager wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:41 AM Eric Gallager wrote:
> >
> > Currently the build machinery handles install-pdf and install-html
> > targets, but no install-dvi target. This patch is a step towards
> > fixi
rds
>
> Thomas
OK, thanks... so... at this point, who do I still need approval from
for the rest of it, then? Should I be cc-ing the build system
maintainers? The maintainers for all the rest of the subdirectories
I'm touching? Global reviewers? Someone else?
Thanks,
Eric Gallager
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 8:23 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/18/2021 7:30 PM, Eric Gallager wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 5:09 PM Eric Gallager wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:41 AM Eric Gallager wrote:
> >>> Currently the build machine
