Re: FINAL subroutines

Hi Salvatore, This looks like it's related to some of the missing finalization functionality (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336). Paul has some patches (e.g. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2022-January/057415.html) which implement most of the missing functionality. With

gfortran, OpenMP and static linking

I've been following the fix proposed by Bernhard in this thread: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055907.html to allow static linking of Fortran codes compiled with -fopenmp. (I know that static linking of OpenMP codes isn't guaranteed to work, but this fix has worked well for m

Re: Error message

Hi Salvatore, I've run into similar error messages occasionally. I've never been able to fully track down the cause, but it seems to happen if I change the content of a derived type (e.g. add some new variable to it), recompile the module containing it, but don't recompile some other module tha

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR37336 finalization

I agree with Steve that the lack of finalization support in gfortran means there are not many open-source Fortran projects that rely on it. I've made extensive use of finalization: https://github.com/galacticusorg/galacticus An issue with this is that I had to work-around the missing pieces of

Segfault when using defined assignment

I opened a PR on bugzilla for the following: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109066 The following code (compiled using current trunk), when run, causes a segfault, and valgrind complains about an invalid read. The code appears correct to me, and runs correctly (no segfault, no warn

Possible problems with OpenMP task parallelism

I've been starting to try using OpenMP task parallelism, but I'm running into some issues. I'm not sufficiently experienced with task parallelism in OpenMP to know if I'm misunderstanding how it should work, or if there's a compiler bug. Here's an example code (highly simplified from the actua

Re: Possible problems with OpenMP task parallelism

I've opened PRs for both of these issues: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110547 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110548 -Andrew -- * Andrew Benson: http://users.obs.carnegiescience.edu/abenson * Galacticus: https://github.com/galacticusorg/galacticus On Wed, Jun 28

Missing finalizations

I will (hopefully) have some time in the next few months to work on gfortran. I could pick up a few easy PRs to fix, but a more ambitious (and more useful) task would be to work on some of the missing finalizations. For my own work finalization of function results and stay constructors would be

Re: Missing finalizations

I do not come up with the goods by the > end of the week. > > Paul > > > On Wed, 15 Sept 2021 at 01:31, Andrew Benson via Fortran < > > fortran@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > I will (hopefully) have some time in the next few months to work on > > gfortr

Re: Missing finalizations

leading brand and I thought that the leading brand was > wrong. > > Give me a day or two and prod me if I do not come up with the goods by the > end of the week. > > Paul > > > On Wed, 15 Sept 2021 at 01:31, Andrew Benson via Fortran < > > fortran@gcc.gnu.org