Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR120843, v2] Fix reject valid, because of inconformable coranks

2025-06-30 Thread Andre Vehreschild
Hi all, here now the version of the patch that seems to be more complete. Regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / F41. Ok for mainline and later backport to gcc-15? Regards, Andre On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 15:44:20 +0200 Andre Vehreschild wrote: > I take this patch back. It seems to be incomp

Re: [Patch, Fortran, Coarray, PR88076, v1] 0/6 Add a shared memory multi process coarray library.

2025-06-30 Thread Steve Kargl
Andre, I've never built gcc for aarch64-freebsd. I was going to suggest doing the full bootstrap, but that seems to be too slow. On amd64, I use ../gcc/configure --prefix=$WDIR \ --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto \ --enable-bootstrap \ --disable-nls \ --disable-libssp \ --disa

Re: [Patch, Fortran, Coarray, PR88076, v1] 0/6 Add a shared memory multi process coarray library.

2025-06-30 Thread Andre Vehreschild
Hi Steve, how to you get a recent gcc compile on aarch64-freebsd-14.3 ? I am seeing several issues in core libraries of gcc that are far away from where I touched the compiler. I am configuring with: configure --disable-multilib\ --enable-stage1-languages=c,fortran,c++\

Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR120846, v1] Fix ICE when a function is called more than once in a coarray expression.

2025-06-30 Thread Harald Anlauf
Am 30.06.25 um 15:29 schrieb Andre Vehreschild: Hi all, attached patch fixes an ICE when in an expression with a coindex a function was used more than once. E.g. coarray(mod( something ), mod( something else ))[i] ICE'd because a component for aliasing the second mod() could not be created. Reg

[Fortran, Patch, PR120846, v1] Fix ICE when a function is called more than once in a coarray expression.

2025-06-30 Thread Andre Vehreschild
Hi all, attached patch fixes an ICE when in an expression with a coindex a function was used more than once. E.g. coarray(mod( something ), mod( something else ))[i] ICE'd because a component for aliasing the second mod() could not be created. Regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / F41. Ok for main

Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR120843, v2] Fix reject valid, because of inconformable coranks

2025-06-30 Thread Harald Anlauf
Am 30.06.25 um 15:25 schrieb Andre Vehreschild: Hi all, here now the version of the patch that seems to be more complete. Regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / F41. Ok for mainline and later backport to gcc-15? This looks good to me. OK for both. Thanks for the patch! Harald Regards,