Dear all,
here's a patch fixing the handling of parameter inquiries of
constant complex arrays. It profits from previous fixes for
inquiries of substrings and essentially adds only the simplification
of %re/%im applies to complex arrays - and fixes a minor frontend
memleak encountered on the way
On 5/30/25 19:44, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 07:37:49PM +0200, Harald Anlauf wrote:
here's a patch fixing the handling of parameter inquiries of
constant complex arrays. It profits from previous fixes for
inquiries of substrings and essentially adds only the simplification
of %
Hello world,
I have just committed the attached patch as obvious and simple
after regression-testing. Will backport to gcc 15 soonish.
This fixes a 15/16 regression where the code was looking at
the typespec of the symbol which we don't set if there is
a RESULT clause.
Thanks to Harald for poin
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 07:37:49PM +0200, Harald Anlauf wrote:
>
> here's a patch fixing the handling of parameter inquiries of
> constant complex arrays. It profits from previous fixes for
> inquiries of substrings and essentially adds only the simplification
> of %re/%im applies to complex arra
Dear all,
the time needed for running the gfortran testsuite has increased so
much that I am looking for options to get this down to something
that is more bearable when working on a Fortran-only patch.
I am already building with --disable-bootstrap, as I cannot afford
a full bootstrap. It is a
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 09:03:27PM +0200, Harald Anlauf wrote:
>
> the time needed for running the gfortran testsuite has increased so
> much that I am looking for options to get this down to something
> that is more bearable when working on a Fortran-only patch.
>
> I am already building with --
When I'm working on a particular area of gfortran, I tend
to use RUNTESTFLAGS to limit what is tested. For example,
I just fixed SPREAD() for scalar source and ncopies < 1.
I do
% cd obj
% gmake
% cd gcc
% gmake check-fortran RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=spread\*.f90"
This only runs 63 tests. Of cours
You could possibly modify the dg.exp file. These are basically scripts.
It's a bit of a pain.
On Fri, May 30, 2025, 1:29 PM Harald Anlauf wrote:
> > When I'm working on a particular area of gfortran, I tend
> > to use RUNTESTFLAGS to limit what is tested. For example,
> > I just fixed SPREAD()