Re: [PATCH] Fortran: fix FAIL of gfortran.dg/specifics_1.f90 after r16-372 [PR120099]

Pushed as r16-734-gbf98b735ae01c6 after an off-list OK by Jerry, and no other responses to the opposite. Harald On 5/18/25 22:53, Harald Anlauf wrote: Dear all, the attached proposed patch fixes PR120099 by modifying gfc_return_by_reference so that it returns true with -ff2c also for intrinsic

Re: [patch, fortran] PR120049 - ICE when using IS_C_ASSOCIATED ()

Hi Jerry, so contrary to what the name of patch claims (pr120049-final.diff), it fixes only the case of direct use of iso_c_binding, but not the indirect one thru the other module, which is the reason for the original ICE and the PR. So if you want to push the incremental patch now, go ahead. C

Re: [patch, fortran] PR120049 - ICE when using IS_C_ASSOCIATED ()

On 5/19/25 1:50 PM, Harald Anlauf wrote: Hi Jerry, so contrary to what the name of patch claims (pr120049-final.diff), it fixes only the case of direct use of iso_c_binding, but not the indirect one thru the other module, which is the reason for the original ICE and the PR. So if you want to pu