Hi all,
@Fortraners: Comments to the added 'do concurrent' item?
@Thomas: Are you fine with this C++ wording?
@Andrew: Likewise for C++ and ROCm bump?
Anyone: comments are welcome.
Affected pages:
* https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-15/changes.html
* https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/gomp/
Cheers,
Tobia
On 17/04/2025 15:10, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hi all,
@Fortraners: Comments to the added 'do concurrent' item?
@Thomas: Are you fine with this C++ wording?
@Andrew: Likewise for C++ and ROCm bump?
This part is fine with me.
Andrew
Anyone: comments are welcome.
Affected pages:
* https://gcc.
Hi Jerry,
thanks for the review and sorry for the long delay. With publishing the team's
patches for gfortran, I also created a pull request for OpenCoarrays. There I
was asked to add some testcase with more "beef" in it. I.e. something that
really makes use of teams and not only smoke tests it. T
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> * https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/gomp/
This is a no-brainer. Please go ahead and push (and any such changes in
the future).
It does make me wonder whether we really need/want distinct docs for minor
releases or shouldn't better keep just one for the br
I now see this in git:
remotes/origin/releases/gcc-15
So we are at or very close to the release.
Cheers,
Jerry
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 5:31 PM Jerry D wrote:
>
> I now see this in git:
>
> remotes/origin/releases/gcc-15
>
> So we are at or very close to the release.
Very close. See https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2025-April/245943.html .
Thanks,
Andrew
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jerry
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Tobias Burnus wrote:
* https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/gomp/
This is a no-brainer.
Well, it still adds GCC 16 …
It does make me wonder whether we really need/want distinct docs for minor
releases or shouldn't better keep just one for the branch?
I
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Anyone: comments are welcome.
> + The standard C++ library (libstdc++) is now supported
I wouldn't mark up libstdc++ as in this context; we are pretty much
treating it as a proper name/project name.
(Two occurrences.)
Looks good to me otherwise, t