Am 09.04.25 um 04:06 schrieb Jerry D:
On 4/8/25 1:43 PM, Harald Anlauf wrote:
Hi all,
the attached patch fixes a rather strange 12/13/14/15 regression.
When walking through the list of procedures in an interface to
find the matching one, the code could remember an inferred type
from a false mod
Hello,
Le 08/04/2025 à 15:29, Andre Vehreschild a écrit :
Hi all,
while working at teams stuff I encountered some issue with the ASSOCIATE
statement:
1. First of all: It does not open its namespace as it is expected to. I.e. the
associate-name (referring to the term as used in F2018 11.1.3.1 R
Hi Andre and Mikael,
The associate block is added *after* the associate statement is matched and
the associate_names added to the parent namespace; see
parse.cc(parse_associate).
nagfor and flang-new both behave in the same way as gfortran. So ifort and
ifx are the odd ones out.
In F2018 and F20
Hi Mikael,
thanks for your input. Meanwhile I checked the compiler explorer
https://godbolt.org/z/Ehbjefzab and got an in-decided picture of what could be
the way to go. First of all, most of the compilers in compiler explorer are
gfortran for different architectures. So I ignored them.
I used t
