Hi Jerry,
thanks for the review and the kind words. Committed as gcc-15-8481-g0f344846a62
Thanks again,
Andre
On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 11:42:35 -0700
Jerry D wrote:
> On 3/20/25 9:20 AM, Andre Vehreschild wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > attached patch fixes a 15-regression where an element of an
Hi Paul,
well, I had those might complicated patches bit my mightily. So let's hope for
the best :-)
Thanks for the review. Committed with your proposed change in the testcase as
gcc-15-8642-ga5c69abf138
Thanks again,
Andre
On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 10:40:11 +
Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
Hi Andre,
Gosh, that's a mighty complicated patch :-) I suggest changing the comment
in the test case:
s/Check that components of procedure pointer aren't freeed./Do not free
procedure pointer components/ or some such.
OK for mainline and, I propose, 14-branch.
Regards and thanks
Paul
On Fri
Hi all,
attached patch fixes freeing of procedure pointers that are stored in a derived
type's component. GFortran did that already for polymorphic types but missed
out on the others.
Regtested ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / F41. Ok for mainline?
Regards,
Andre
--
Andre Vehreschild * Email:
Hi Paul,
thanks for the (additional) review. The patch has been merged already as
gcc-15-8481-g0f344846a62.
But I totally agree, that conv_procedure_call is calling (pun intended) for a
refactoring.
Thanks again,
Andre
On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 14:34:13 +
Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> Hi
