Am 09.03.25 um 17:54 schrieb Mikael Morin:
(Actually, none of the cases you mentioned above can happen, at least
not now, but you're right). Patch which does this approved?
Sure.
Committed after regression-testing.
Thanks for the hint (and the pre-review :-)
Best regards
Thomas
c
Hi Mikael,
_symbol *asym = a->expr->symtree->n.sym;
You may consider calling gfc_commit_symbol(s) instead at the end of the
function body. It might avoid leaking the old_symbol field in case the
function is called more than once or the symbol is already existing (not
completely clear wheth
Le 09/03/2025 à 17:40, Thomas Koenig a écrit :
Hi Mikael,
_symbol *asym = a->expr->symtree->n.sym;
You may consider calling gfc_commit_symbol(s) instead at the end of
the function body. It might avoid leaking the old_symbol field in
case the function is called more than once or the symbol
Hello,
sorry to come late to the party.
Le 08/03/2025 à 13:52, Thomas Koenig a écrit :
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/interface.cc b/gcc/fortran/interface.cc
index edec907d33a..e3bc22f25e5 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/interface.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/interface.cc
@@ -5836,6 +5836,8 @@ gfc_get_formal_from_
