Hi Steve,
Am 07.02.25 um 21:39 schrieb Steve Kargl:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 09:31:12PM +0100, Harald Anlauf wrote:
Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline?
Looks reasonable.
While it is a really old bug but wrong code, I'd like to backport
this also at least to 14-branch. Any
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 09:31:12PM +0100, Harald Anlauf wrote:
>
> Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline?
>
Looks reasonable.
> While it is a really old bug but wrong code, I'd like to backport
> this also at least to 14-branch. Any reservations?
If it passes regression testing,
Dear all,
the initialization of allocatable non-deferred character with NULL
when being a component of a derived type used a wrong path instead
of properly initializing with a null pointer and produced really
weird code.
Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline?
While it is a really o