Hi all,
pushed as gcc-15-6292-g9684e70952a. Thanks for the review.
- Andre
On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 19:15:12 +0100
Harald Anlauf wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> Am 16.12.24 um 15:26 schrieb Andre Vehreschild:
> > Hi Harald,
> >
> > thanks for finding the bug so quickly. I took another look and came up with
Hi All,
This bug was so obviously in defiance of the standard that I pushed it to
mainline as r15-6260. I meant to post this message immediately but was
distracted before I could press send. I will be backporting today.
Paul
Change.Logs
Description: Binary data
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-ex
Hi all, hello PA,
Tobias Burnus wrote:
Paul-Antoine Arras wrote:
See the revised patch attached and my comments below.
I have not looked in depth at the patch, but managed to
write C-ism code, which caused a segfault (due to a missing "call"),
Additional comments: Can you hoist the condition
24
# of expected failures 274
# of unsupported tests 87
/usr/home/kargl/gcc/obj/gcc/gfortran version 15.0.0 20241217
(experimental) (GCC)
The unexpected failures are all ASAN or LTO related. Jerryd has
indicated that the patch bootstraps on x86_64_linux_gnu and also
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 04:53:42AM -0800, Damian Rouson wrote:
> including automatic GPU offloading. Then a few months ago, the death blow
> that I couldn’t work around was robust support for kind type parameters.
>
gfortran doesn't have robust kind type parameters?
% cat xx.f90
program foo
Thanks Paul.
Regards, Jerry
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024, 12:34 AM Paul Richard Thomas <
paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This bug was so obviously in defiance of the standard that I pushed it to
> mainline as r15-6260. I meant to post this message immediately but was
> distracted bef
