../../gcc/fortran/trans-io.cc: In function 'tree_node*
gfc_trans_transfer(gfc_code*)':
../../gcc/fortran/trans-io.cc:2662:24: error: enumeration value 'EXPR_UNKNOWN'
not handled in switch [-Werror=switch]
2662 | switch (ref->u.ar.start[n]->expr_type)
|
H Harald, hi Paul,
Harald Anlauf wrote:
Pushed as r15-5766 .
This caused a build fail; see also: https://gcc.gnu.org/PR117843
It looks as if a 'default: break;' is missing.
…/gcc/fortran/trans-io.cc: In function 'tree_node*
gfc_trans_transfer(gfc_code*)':
…/gcc/fortran/trans-io.cc:2662:24:
This fixes a bootstrap failure due to a warning on enum values not being
handled. In this case, it is just checking two values and the rest should
are not handled so adding a default case fixes the issue.
Pushed as obvious.
PR fortran/117843
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
* trans-io.cc (
Hi All,
This patch was originally pushed as r15-2739. Subsequently memory faults
were found and so the patch was reverted. At the time, I could find where
the problem lay. This morning I had another look and found it almost
immediately :-)
The fix is the 'gfc_resize_class_size_with_len' in the ch
Thanks, Andrew, for fixing this!
I did not get any reports from the pre-commit testers; I only
saw the fallout later.
And sorry for breaking bootstrap!
Harald
Am 29.11.24 um 10:16 schrieb Andrew Pinski:
This fixes a bootstrap failure due to a warning on enum values not being
handled. In this
Hi Paul,
the patch seems to contain stuff that has already been pushed
(gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr117768.f90, and the chunks in
class.cc and resolve.cc). Can you please check?
Cheers,
Harald
Am 29.11.24 um 17:34 schrieb Paul Richard Thomas:
Hi All,
This patch was originally pushed as r15-2
Hi Harald,
Sorry about that - it was the standard HEAD versus HEAD~ mistake.
Thanks for pointing it out.
Paul
On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 at 17:31, Harald Anlauf wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> the patch seems to contain stuff that has already been pushed
> (gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr117768.f90, and the chu
