Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR81265, v1] Fix passing coarrays always w/ descriptor

Hi Steve, the testcase is in the coarray directory, where tests are executed mit -fcoarray=single and lib. I don't know about none. Because the code stops compiling when it encounters a coarray with no single or lib. Therefore I suppose there no way to run it without coarrays. Hope that helps, A

Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR81265, v1] Fix passing coarrays always w/ descriptor

On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 03:20:43PM +0200, Andre Vehreschild wrote: > > attached patch fixes a runtime issue when a coarray was passed as > parameter to a procedure that was itself a parameter. The issue here > was that the coarray was passed as array pointer (i.e. w/o descriptor) > to the function

Re: Fwd: [patch, fortran] Matmul and dot_product for unsigned

Le 26/09/2024 à 21:57, Thomas Koenig a écrit : Now for the remaining intrinsics (FINDLOC, MAXLOC, MINLOC, MAXVAL, MINVAL, CSHIFT and EOSHIFT still missing). I have one patch series touching (inline) MINLOC and MAXLOC to post in the coming days. Could you please keep away from them for one mor

Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR81265, v1] Fix passing coarrays always w/ descriptor

On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 08:12:01PM +0200, Andre Vehreschild wrote: > > the testcase is in the coarray directory, where tests are executed mit > -fcoarray=single and lib. I don't know about none. Because the code stops > compiling when it encounters a coarray with no single or lib. Therefore I > su

Re: Fwd: [patch, fortran] Matmul and dot_product for unsigned

Le 27/09/2024 à 17:08, Thomas Koenig a écrit : Hi Mikael, Now for the remaining intrinsics (FINDLOC, MAXLOC, MINLOC, MAXVAL, MINVAL, CSHIFT and EOSHIFT still missing). I have one patch series touching (inline) MINLOC and MAXLOC to post in the coming days.  Could you please keep away from them

[Fortran, Patch, PR81265, v1] Fix passing coarrays always w/ descriptor

Hi all, attached patch fixes a runtime issue when a coarray was passed as parameter to a procedure that was itself a parameter. The issue here was that the coarray was passed as array pointer (i.e. w/o descriptor) to the function, but the function expected it to be an array w/ descriptor. Regtest

Re: Fwd: [patch, fortran] Matmul and dot_product for unsigned

Hi Mikael, Now for the remaining intrinsics (FINDLOC, MAXLOC, MINLOC, MAXVAL, MINVAL, CSHIFT and EOSHIFT still missing). I have one patch series touching (inline) MINLOC and MAXLOC to post in the coming days.  Could you please keep away from them for one more week or two? Looking at the pre