Hi All,
This correspondence touches on something that I was going to raise - how do
we incorporate experimental F202Y features?
The reason that I ask is that Reinhold Bader proposed extensions to the
processing of assumed rank objects, which became a DIN proposal to WG5 -
see attached. It made so
The use -std=f202y seems like a reasonable approach to
wall off experimental implementations of proposed changes
to the Fortran standard. Thomas has introduced -funsigned
for this purpose, which I suppose can be thought of a more
fine-grained wall.
BTW, J3 passed 24-136r1.txt, which is marked a
On 9/10/24 12:49 AM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
Hi All,
This correspondence touches on something that I was going to raise - how
do we incorporate experimental F202Y features?
I very much suppory this idea and would like to see Thomas and Pauls
patches go in under this option so we do not
Hi Paul,
This correspondence touches on something that I was going to raise - how
do we incorporate experimental F202Y features?
I think your suggestion of -std=f202y is good, we can then make
-funsigned depend on that.
Hmm... one thing. I just read
https://wg5-fortran.org/N2201-N2250/N223
