Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR 96992, V4] Fix Class arrays of different ranks are rejected as storage association argument

Hi Harald, thank you very much for ok'ing this large patch. Merged as gcc-15-1965-ge4f2f46e015 Looking forward to get (no) bug reports ;-) Thanks again, Andre On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 20:52:37 +0200 Harald Anlauf wrote: > Hi Andre, > > Am 10.07.24 um 10:45 schrieb Andre Vehreschild: > > Hi Harald

Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR 96992, V4] Fix Class arrays of different ranks are rejected as storage association argument

On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 10:04 AM Andre Vehreschild wrote: > > Hi Harald, > > thank you very much for ok'ing this large patch. Merged as > gcc-15-1965-ge4f2f46e015 > > Looking forward to get (no) bug reports ;-) This seems to break bootstrap with ../../gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc: In function

Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR 96992, V4] Fix Class arrays of different ranks are rejected as storage association argument

On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 10:54 AM Richard Biener wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 10:04 AM Andre Vehreschild wrote: > > > > Hi Harald, > > > > thank you very much for ok'ing this large patch. Merged as > > gcc-15-1965-ge4f2f46e015 > > > > Looking forward to get (no) bug reports ;-) > > This seem

Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR 96992, V4] Fix Class arrays of different ranks are rejected as storage association argument

On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 11:04 AM Andre Vehreschild wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > I am sorry to hear that. Shall I revert? I would suggest to instead fix by initializing the variable with NULL (and a comment). > - Andre > On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 10:57:48 +0200 > Richard Biener wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul

Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR 96992, V4] Fix Class arrays of different ranks are rejected as storage association argument

Hi Richard, I am sorry to hear that. Shall I revert? - Andre On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 10:57:48 +0200 Richard Biener wrote: > On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 10:54 AM Richard Biener > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 10:04 AM Andre Vehreschild > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Harald, > > > > > > thank you

Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR 96992, V4] Fix Class arrays of different ranks are rejected as storage association argument

Hi Richard, would that be sufficient? Bootstrap is still running for me... From c30c2cf829a094ba5e4c2c31333bed6e8c0d32af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andre Vehreschild Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:21:04 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] [Fortran] Fix bootstrap broken by gcc-15-1965-ge4f2f46e015 gcc/fortran

RE: Lower zeroing array assignment to memset for allocatable arrays

> -Original Message- > From: Harald Anlauf > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2024 12:53 AM > To: Prathamesh Kulkarni ; gcc- > patc...@gcc.gnu.org; fortran@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: Lower zeroing array assignment to memset for allocatable > arrays > > External email: Use caution opening links

Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR 96992, V4] Fix Class arrays of different ranks are rejected as storage association argument

On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 11:24 AM Andre Vehreschild wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > would that be sufficient? Bootstrap is still running for me... Yes. Richard. > From c30c2cf829a094ba5e4c2c31333bed6e8c0d32af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Andre Vehreschild > Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:21:04 +0200

Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR 96992, V4] Fix Class arrays of different ranks are rejected as storage association argument

Hi Richard, bootstrap finally passed and the fix is now merged as gcc-15-1971-gb9513c6746b Thanks for your patience. - Andre On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 14:01:02 +0200 Richard Biener wrote: > On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 11:24 AM Andre Vehreschild > wrote: > > > > Hi Richard, > > > > would that be suffi

[Patch, Fortran, PR88624, v1] Fix Rejects allocatable coarray passed as a dummy argument

Hi all, attached patch fixes using of coarrays as dummy arguments. The coarray dummy argument was not dereferenced correctly, which is fixed now. Regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / Fedora 39. Ok for mainline. Regards, Andre -- Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gcc dot gnu dot org Fro

[Patch, Fortran, PR84244, v1] Fix ICE in recompute_tree_invariant_for_addr_expr, at tree.c:4535

Hi all, the attached patch fixes a segfault in the compiler, where for pointer components of a derived type the caf_token in the component was not set, when the derived was previously used outside of a coarray. Regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / Fedora 39. Ok for mainline? Regards, And

[PATCH] fortran: Factor the evaluation of MINLOCK/MAXLOC's BACK argument

From: Mikael Morin Hello, I discovered this while testing the inline MINLOC/MAXLOC (aka PR90608) patches. Regression tested on x86_64-linux. OK for master? -- 8< -- Move the evaluation of the BACK argument out of the loop in the inline code generated for MINLOC or MAXLOC. For that, add a new

Re: Lower zeroing array assignment to memset for allocatable arrays

Hi Prathamesh! Am 11.07.24 um 12:16 schrieb Prathamesh Kulkarni: -Original Message- From: Harald Anlauf Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2024 12:53 AM To: Prathamesh Kulkarni ; gcc- patc...@gcc.gnu.org; fortran@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Lower zeroing array assignment to memset for allocatable

Re: [PATCH] fortran: Factor the evaluation of MINLOCK/MAXLOC's BACK argument

Hi Mikael, Am 11.07.24 um 21:55 schrieb Mikael Morin: From: Mikael Morin Hello, I discovered this while testing the inline MINLOC/MAXLOC (aka PR90608) patches. Regression tested on x86_64-linux. OK for master? this is a nice finding! (NAG seems to fail on the cases with array size 0, while