[Patch] Fortran/Openmp: Use OPT_Wopenmp for gfc_match_omp_depobj warning

When checking something else, I noticed that there was one warning in openmp.cc that did not use OPT_Wopenmp. I intent to commit the attached patch later today as obvious. Tobias Fortran/Openmp: Use OPT_Wopenmp for gfc_match_omp_depobj warning gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: * openmp.cc (gfc_match_om

Re: [Patch] Fortran/Openmp: Use OPT_Wopenmp for gfc_match_omp_depobj warning

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:25:54PM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote: > When checking something else, I noticed that there was one warning in > openmp.cc that did not use OPT_Wopenmp. > > I intent to commit the attached patch later today as obvious. > > Tobias > Fortran/Openmp: Use OPT_Wopenmp for gfc_

[PATCH, v2] Fix fortran/PR114024

Hi Steve, all, here's an updated patch with an enhanced testcase that also checks MOLD= besides SOURCE=. Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Is it OK for mainline? Cheers, Harald On 2/22/24 22:32, Harald Anlauf wrote: On 2/22/24 22:01, Steve Kargl wrote: BTW, my patch and I suspect your impro

Re: [PATCH, v2] Fix fortran/PR114024

On 23 February 2024 22:15:17 CET, Harald Anlauf wrote: >Hi Steve, all, > >here's an updated patch with an enhanced testcase that also >checks MOLD= besides SOURCE=. > >Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Is it OK for mainline? LGTM cheers > >Cheers, >Harald

Re: [PATCH, v2] Fix fortran/PR114024

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 10:15:17PM +0100, Harald Anlauf wrote: > Hi Steve, all, > > here's an updated patch with an enhanced testcase that also > checks MOLD= besides SOURCE=. > > Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Is it OK for mainline? > >From my viewpoint, yes. Thanks for finding a better s