On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 12:23:26PM +, Julian Brown wrote:
> * g++.dg/gomp/bad-array-section-10.C: New test.
This test FAILs in C++23/C++26 modes, just try
make check-g++ GXX_TESTSUITE_STDS=98,11,14,17,20,23,26
RUNTESTFLAGS=gomp.exp=bad-array-section-10.C
While in C++20 comma in ar
On 05/01/2024 01:43, Lipeng Zhu wrote:
This patch try to fix the bug when HAVE_ATOMIC_FETCH_ADD is
not defined in dec_waiting_unlocked function. As io.h does
not include async.h, the WRLOCK and RWUNLOCK macros are
undefined.
libgfortran/ChangeLog:
* io/io.h (dec_waiting_unlocked): Use
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinaries
Op wo 10 jan 2024 om 11:54 schreef abhay dutta :
>
>
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 10:14:41 +0100
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 12:23:26PM +, Julian Brown wrote:
> > * g++.dg/gomp/bad-array-section-10.C: New test.
>
> This test FAILs in C++23/C++26 modes, just try
> make check-g++ GXX_TESTSUITE_STDS=98,11,14,17,20,23,26
>
Julian Brown wrote:
This patch adds support for parsing general lvalues ("locator list item
types") for OpenMP "map", "to" and "from" clauses to the C front-end,
similar to the previously-posted patch for C++. Such syntax is permitted
for OpenMP 5.0 and above. It was previously posted for mainl
Dear all,
we are accepting loop annotations IVDEP, UNROLL n, VECTOR, and NOVECTOR
for ordinary do loops, but ICE when such an annotation is specified
before a DO CONCURRENT loop.
Since at least the Intel compilers recognize some of the annotations
also for DO CONCURRENT, it seems natural to exten
On 1/10/2024 7:52 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 05/01/2024 01:43, Lipeng Zhu wrote:
This patch try to fix the bug when HAVE_ATOMIC_FETCH_ADD is
not defined in dec_waiting_unlocked function. As io.h does
not include async.h, the WRLOCK and RWUNLOCK macros are
undefined.
libgfortran/ChangeLog
