Re: [Patch, fortran] PR49213 - [OOP] gfortran rejects structure constructor expression

Hi Harald, I'll change to gfc_charlen_type_node. Thanks for your patience in reviewing this patch :-) Cheers Paul On Tue, 27 Jun 2023 at 20:27, Harald Anlauf wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > this is much better now. > > I have only a minor comment left: in the calculation of the > size of a character

[Patch fortran] PR89645 - No IMPLICIT type error with: ASSOCIATE( X => function() )

This is a heads up for a patch that has not been exercised enough as yet. It works rather better and with less pain than I expected. The testcase is really that of PR99065 but I thought that I should give Ian Harvey prior credit for PR89645. Both appear in the meta-bug PR87477. I'll do the exerc

[PATCH, part3, committed] Fortran: ABI for scalar CHARACTER(LEN=1),VALUE dummy argument [PR110360]

Dear all, the previous patches to this PR unfortunately caused a regression, seen on Power big-endian systems/-m32 (pr110419), and while trying to investigate on x86 also showed a regression (ICE) on cases that were not covered in the testsuite before. The original fix did not properly handle the

Re: PR82943 - Suggested patch to fix

Hi Alex, welcome to the gfortran community. It is great that you are trying to get actively involved. You already did quite a few things right: patches shall be sent to the gcc-patches ML, but Fortran reviewers usually notice them only where they are copied to the fortran ML. There are some ge

Possible problems with OpenMP task parallelism

I've been starting to try using OpenMP task parallelism, but I'm running into some issues. I'm not sufficiently experienced with task parallelism in OpenMP to know if I'm misunderstanding how it should work, or if there's a compiler bug. Here's an example code (highly simplified from the actua