Re: libgfortran: remove support for --enable-intermodule

2023-06-11 Thread Mikael Morin
Le 10/06/2023 à 22:28, FX Coudert via Fortran a écrit : See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109373 I don’t believe it is widely used, and it was removed from everywhere else in gcc. Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK to commit? FX OK, thanks.

Re: [PATCH] Fortran: add Fortran 2018 IEEE_{MIN,MAX} functions

2023-06-11 Thread Thomas Koenig via Fortran
Hi FX, >> The KIND=17 is a bit of a kludge. It is not visible for >> user programs, they use KIND=16, but this is then translated >> to library calls as if it was KIND=17 if the IEEE 128-bit floats >> are selected > > Can you check what the IEEE test results are when -mabi=ieeelongdouble is ena

Re: libgfortran: remove support for --enable-intermodule

2023-06-11 Thread FX Coudert via Fortran
> OK, thanks. Committed at https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=ecc96eb5d2a0e5dd93365ef76a58d7f754273934

Re: [PATCH] Fortran: add Fortran 2018 IEEE_{MIN,MAX} functions

2023-06-11 Thread FX Coudert via Fortran
Hi, > Running > nohup make -j7 check-fortran > RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/-mabi=ieeelongdouble/-mcpu=power9"& > from the gcc subdirectory yielded only a single failure: I dug more into the code and I understand why all tests are running: since db630423a97ec6690a8eb0e5c3cb186c91e3740d and