Re: Possible funding of gfortran work

2023-05-31 Thread Benson Muite via Fortran
On 5/31/23 09:08, Thomas Koenig wrote: > On 31.05.23 05:46, Benson Muite wrote: >> On 5/30/23 23:08, Thomas Koenig via Fortran wrote: > > * Complete language intrinsic parallel programming paradigm coarrays. This includes completing native coarray support (thread based). As > w

Re: Possible funding of gfortran work

2023-05-31 Thread Andre Vehreschild via Fortran
Hi Thomas, I have revamp the proposal a bit more. Thank you for your input. I took some of it "as is", but I also rephrased some of it. I hope you are ok with that. Here is what I have so far: --- - Title: GFortran-Improvement - Abstract: Enable the free gfortran compiler to support contempora

Re: Possible funding of gfortran work

2023-05-31 Thread Damian Rouson
Thanks for working on this, guys. I made a few suggestions below. Damian On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 5:25 AM Andre Vehreschild via Fortran < fortran@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > - Dependencies (on the project as well as projects that depend on the > technology; max 300 words) > > CP2K https://www.cp2k

[Patch] OpenMP/Fortran: Permit pure directives inside PURE

2023-05-31 Thread Tobias Burnus
I intent to commit the attached patch soon. However, I want to give anyone the chance to comment on any aspect before committing. Comments after the commit are welcome as well :-) OpenMP 5.2 now uses properties to clauses and "pure" is among those properties. Note that pure-2.f90 contains also