Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] P1689R5 support

2023-02-03 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Fortran
On Fri, 3 Feb 2023, 04:09 Andrew Pinski via Gcc, wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 1:07 PM Ben Boeckel via Fortran > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > This patch series adds initial support for ISO C++'s [P1689R5][], a > > format for describing C++ module requirements and provisions based on > > the sou

Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] P1689R5 support

2023-02-03 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Fortran
On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 at 08:58, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > On Fri, 3 Feb 2023, 04:09 Andrew Pinski via Gcc, wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 1:07 PM Ben Boeckel via Fortran >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > This patch series adds initial support for ISO C++'s [P1689R5][], a >> > format for d

Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] P1689R5 support

2023-02-03 Thread Ben Boeckel via Fortran
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 09:10:21 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 at 08:58, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Feb 2023, 04:09 Andrew Pinski via Gcc, wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 1:07 PM Ben Boeckel via Fortran > >> wrote: > >> > This patch series adds initial support f

[PATCH] fortran: Fix up hash table usage in gfc_trans_use_stmts [PR108451]

2023-02-03 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Fortran
Hi! The first testcase in the PR (which I haven't included in the patch because it is unclear to me if it is supposed to be valid or not) ICEs since extra hash table checking has been added recently. The problem is that gfc_trans_use_stmts does tree *slot = entry->decls->find_slot_with_

Re: [PATCH] fortran: Fix up hash table usage in gfc_trans_use_stmts [PR108451]

2023-02-03 Thread Steve Kargl via Fortran
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 08:03:36PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek via Fortran wrote: > Hi! > > The first testcase in the PR (which I haven't included in the patch because > it is unclear to me if it is supposed to be valid or not) ICEs since extra > hash table checking has been added recently. The problem