Re: [PATCH] Fortran: error recovery for invalid types in array constructors [PR107000]

Hello Le 04/10/2022 à 23:19, Harald Anlauf via Fortran a écrit : Dear all, we did not recover well from bad expressions in array constructors, especially when there was a typespec and a unary '+' or '-', and when the array constructor was used in an arithmetic expression. The attached patch in

Re: [PATCH] Fortran: error recovery for invalid types in array constructors [PR107000]

Le 05/10/2022 à 10:51, Mikael Morin a écrit : Unfortunately, it doesn't fix the bogus incommensurate arrays errors. The following does. diff --git a/gcc/fortran/arith.cc b/gcc/fortran/arith.cc index e6e35ef3c42..2c57c796270 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/arith.cc +++ b/gcc/fortran/arith.cc @@ -14

Re: [PATCH] Fortran: reject procedures and procedure pointers as output item [PR107074]

Hello Le 04/10/2022 à 21:27, Harald Anlauf via Fortran a écrit : Dear all, when looking at output item lists we didn't catch procedures and procedure pointers and ran into a gfc_internal_error(). Such items are not allowed by the Fortran standard, e.g. for procedure pointers there is C1233 (R1

Re: [Patch] Fortran: Add OpenMP's assume(s) directives

Hi Jakub, On 04.10.22 14:58, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote: On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 02:26:13PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 07:47:18PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi OK? Ok, thanks. Committed as https://gcc.gnu.

Re: [Patch] Fortran: Add OpenMP's assume(s) directives

Minor update to just posted patch: the table did not revert all strings where a substring directive name existed, i.e. 'target' vs. 'target update', 'assume' vs. 'assumes'. Now fixed. Otherwise unchanged: Tobias On 05.10.22 13:19, Tobias Burnus wrote: Hi Jakub, On 04.10.22 14:58, Jakub Jelin

Re: [Patch] Fortran: Add OpenMP's assume(s) directives

On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 02:29:56PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: > + gfc_error ("!OMP ASSUMES at %C must be in the specification part of a " s/!OMP/!$OMP/ Otherwise LGTM. Jakub

Re: [PATCH, v2] Fortran: reject procedures and procedure pointers as IO element [PR107074]

Hi Mikael, > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 05. Oktober 2022 um 12:34 Uhr > Von: "Mikael Morin" > Please move the check to resolve_transfer in resolve.cc. I have done this, see attached updated patch. Regtests cleanly on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. > Strangely, the patch doesn't seem to fix the problem on the t

Re: [PATCH, v2] Fortran: error recovery for invalid types in array constructors [PR107000]

Hi Mikael, > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 05. Oktober 2022 um 11:23 Uhr > Von: "Mikael Morin" > An: "Harald Anlauf" , "fortran" , > "gcc-patches" > Betreff: Re: [PATCH] Fortran: error recovery for invalid types in array > constructors [PR107000] > The following does. > > > diff --git a/gcc/fortran/ari