I forgot to include the gfortran.map part of the patch, and so the test failed
on platforms that have symbol versioning.
Fix below committed to master.
FX
commit ce8aed75a38b468490ecab4c318e3eb08d468608 (HEAD -> master)
Author: Francois-Xavier Coudert
Date: 2022-09-21 10:04:22 +0200
Fo
Follow-up patch, including a test, committed as attached.
FX
0001-Fortran-handle-RADIX-kind-in-IEEE_SET_ROUNDING_MODE.patch
Description: Binary data
Hi Harald,
I think I understand much of what is said, but I feel that I do
not really understand what *clobber* means for the different
beasts we are discussing (although I have an impression of what
it means for a scalar object).
Obviously, "clobber" means taking a big stick and hitting the
Dear all,
I intend to commit the attached, obvious patch for a NULL pointer
dereference until tomorrow unless there are comments or objections.
We better skip initialization for a symbol which is an associate name.
Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Thanks,
Harald
From 0259762271b2eb430e058b0bff
Le 21/09/2022 à 11:57, Thomas Koenig a écrit :
Hi Harald,
I think I understand much of what is said, but I feel that I do
not really understand what *clobber* means for the different
beasts we are discussing (although I have an impression of what
it means for a scalar object).
Obviously, "cl
Hi Mikael,
Am 21.09.22 um 20:56 schrieb Mikael Morin:
Le 21/09/2022 à 11:57, Thomas Koenig a écrit :
Hi Harald,
I think I understand much of what is said, but I feel that I do
not really understand what *clobber* means for the different
beasts we are discussing (although I have an impression
Dear all,
the patch for this PR was submitted for review by Jose here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055934.html
but unfortunately was never reviewed.
I verified that it works on mainline and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu,
and I think that it is fine.
Although the above mail suggest
Hello,
Here is a patch that fixes an ICE in gfortran triggered by an invalid
end statement at the end of an OMP metadirective:
```
!$OMP metadirective ...
...
!$OMP end ...
```
Does this fix look correct?
Thanks,
--
Paul-Antoine ArrasFrom 73ecbc2672a5352a08260f7a9d0de6d2c29ea
Hello Harald,
the patch for this PR was submitted for review by Jose here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055934.html
but unfortunately was never reviewed.
I verified that it works on mainline and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu,
and I think that it is fine.
Although the above mail
