On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 08:02:04PM -0600, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> I ran into this bug in the handling of clauses on the combined "masked
> taskloop" OMP directive when I was working on something else. The fix
> turned out to be a 1-liner. OK for trunk?
>
> -Sandra
> commit 17c4fa0bd97c0709450
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 08:03:09PM -0600, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> I've got another patch forthcoming (stage 1 material) that adds some new
> diagnostics for non-rectangular loops during gimplification of OMP nodes.
> When I was working on that, I discovered that the Fortran front end wasn't
> att
Greetings,
Propose patch for https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104812 to
reject non-conforming code when construct-name clashes with already
defined symbol names, e.g:
subroutine s1
logical :: x
x: if (x) then ! Currently gfortran accepts 'x' as constuct-name
Hi Harald,
Steve's analysis (see PR) showed that we confused the case when a
symbol refererred to a recursive procedure which was named the same
as an intrinsic. The standard allows such recursive references
(see e.g. F2018:19.3.1).
The attached patch is based on Steve's, but handles both func
