Dear all,
another trivial and obvious one, discovered by Gerhard.
We can have a NULL pointer dereference simplifying EOSHIFT on an array
that was not properly declared.
Pushed to mainline as r12-6977 after regtesting on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Will backport to affected branches [11/10] with some de
Dear Fortranners,
a check in gfc_calculate_transfer_sizes had a bug in the logic:
it did not trigger for MOLD having a storage size zero when
arugment SIZE was present. The attached obvious patch fixes this.
Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline/11/10/9?
Thanks,
Harald
From b8f124
