Re: libgfortran bootstrap failure

On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 10:30:26PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote: > The recent patch to support Power IEEE128 causes a bootstrap failure > on AIX and possibly all non-GLIBC systems. > > +#if defined(__powerpc64__) && __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__ \ > +&& defined __GLIBC_PREREQ && __G

Re: [PATCH] Mass rename of C++ .c files to .cc suffix

On 1/11/22 17:16, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 05:03:34PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote: On 1/11/22 16:56, Jakub Jelinek wrote: While e.g. libcpp or gcc are in C++. Which means I should rename .c files under libcpp, right? Is there any other folder from gcc/ and libcpp/ that would

Re: GCC GSoC 2022: Call for project ideas and mentors

On Thu, Jan 06 2022, Martin Jambor wrote: > [...] > > I will update you as more details about GSoC 2022 become available. > The official timeline has been published at https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/timeline I do not know how the "standard coding period" and "extended deadlines" w

Re: GCC GSoC 2022: Call for project ideas and mentors

On Wed, Jan 12 2022, Martin Jambor wrote: > On Thu, Jan 06 2022, Martin Jambor wrote: >> > [...] >> >> I will update you as more details about GSoC 2022 become available. >> > > The official timeline has been published at > https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/timeline > > I do not know h

Re: [PATCH] Fortran: make IEEE_CLASS recognize signaling NaNs

Hi, I can confirm that I don’t see this failure on a Debian bullseye/sid (Linux 5.11.0-46, glibc 2.31-0ubuntu9.2) with a fresh bootstrap of master: $ grep signaling testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.sum PASS: gfortran.dg/ieee/signaling_1.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors) PASS: gfortran.dg/ieee/signa

Re: [PATCH] Fortran: make IEEE_CLASS recognize signaling NaNs

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 11:23:43AM +0100, FX via Gcc-patches wrote: > I can confirm that I don’t see this failure on a Debian bullseye/sid (Linux > 5.11.0-46, glibc 2.31-0ubuntu9.2) with a fresh bootstrap of master: > > $ grep signaling testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.sum > PASS: gfortran.dg/ieee/sig

Re: [PATCH] Fortran: make IEEE_CLASS recognize signaling NaNs

Hi Jakub, > We need -fintrinsic-modules-path option for the signalling_1.f90 compilation > but need to make sure it isn't used when the *.c file is compiled, so they > need to be compiled by separate compiler invocations probably. Thanks for posting the errors! So I wasn’t seeing it because I had

Re: [PATCH] Fortran: make IEEE_CLASS recognize signaling NaNs

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 12:03:40PM +0100, FX wrote: > > We need -fintrinsic-modules-path option for the signalling_1.f90 compilation > > but need to make sure it isn't used when the *.c file is compiled, so they > > need to be compiled by separate compiler invocations probably. > > Thanks for post

Re: [PATCH] Fortran: make IEEE_CLASS recognize signaling NaNs

> Thanks. Just a nit, it is cc1 that reports the warning, not f951. I confirm the patch fixes the testcase failure. And I fixed the comment in a follow-up commit. Thanks! FX

[PATCH] git-backport: support renamed .cc files in commit message.

Hi. There's a patch that enhances git-backport so that it updates commit messages for files which name ends now with .cc and is still .c on a branch. Example usage: $ git show test commit 8ed4b2cb9aa158c0ef418fd1ac66271664904604 (test) Author: Martin Liska Date: Wed Jan 12 16:08:13 2022 +010

[PATCH] PR fortran/67804 - ICE on data initialization of type(character) with wrong data

Dear Fortranners, the attached patch improves error recovery after an invalid structure constructor has been detected in a DATA statement. Testcase by Gerhard. Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline? This should be a rather safe patch which I would like to backport to 11-branch afte