Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/102332 - ICE in select_type_set_tmp, at fortran/match.c:6366

Hi Harald, That is the sort of thing that I had in mind. Is it worth adding the check for CLASS_DATA? I cannot remember if that is made redundant by the test of the class_ok attribute. Cheers Paul On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 at 21:08, Harald Anlauf wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Am 28.12.21 um 12:56 schrieb

Need for __builtin_issignaling()

Hi, In order to finalize our support for Fortran IEEE modules, we need to have access to a reliable issignaling() macro, that would work across all floating-point types. Some targets (glibc ones, notably) have it, but not all, far from it. Instead of implementing our own, probably buggy, probab

Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/102332 - ICE in select_type_set_tmp, at fortran/match.c:6366

Hi Paul, Am 29.12.21 um 12:45 schrieb Paul Richard Thomas via Fortran: Hi Harald, That is the sort of thing that I had in mind. Is it worth adding the check for CLASS_DATA? I cannot remember if that is made redundant by the test of the class_ok attribute. the macro CLASS_DATA appears to have

[pushed] Fortran: keep

Hi, Fortran 2018 added some synonyms to the existing IEEE_CLASS_TYPE values, namely IEEE_NEGATIVE_SUBNORMAL (which is the same as IEEE_NEGATIVE_DENORMAL) and IEEE_POSITIVE_SUBNORMAL (same as IEEE_POSITIVE_DENORMAL). When they were added to the C side, they were not kept in sync with the Fortran pa