On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 21:46:32 +0100
Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote:
> Hi Bernhard,
>
> I'm trying to understand your patch. What does it really try to solve?
Compiler generated symbols should be marked artificial.
The fix for PR88009 ( f8add009ce300f24b75e9c2e2cc5dd944a020c28 ,
r9-5194 ) added
Do you have testcases/reproducers demonstrating that the patch actually
fixes the issues you're describing?
Am 17.11.21 um 09:12 schrieb Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Gcc-patches:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 21:46:32 +0100
Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote:
Hi Bernhard,
I'm trying to understand your pa
Dear Fortranners,
as NULL() is not interoperable, we have to reject it.
Confirmed by NAG. Other compilers show "interesting behavior".
Obvious patch by Steve. Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
OK for mainline?
Thanks,
Harald
From 52a3ee53f0a12e897c4651fa8378e045653b9fd3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2
