Re: ping re F2003 and F2008 standards compliance

2021-11-02 Thread Paul Richard Thomas via Fortran
Hi Sandra, Some weeks ago Andrew Benson triggered me to recover a patch for finalization in ordinary assignment. I have attached the patch and the testcase for early review. The main change that the patch makes is to call Tobias's finalization wrapper rather than the direct finalizer calls from st

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fortran manual updates

2021-11-02 Thread Martin Liška
On 11/2/21 00:56, Sandra Loosemore wrote: I'll wait a couple days before committing these patches, in case anybody wants to give some feedback, especially on technical issues. Hello. Appreciate the work you did, but the patchset will cause quite some conflicts in the prepared Sphinx migration

[PATCH] PR fortran/91497 -- Silence conversion warnings for MIN1 and MAX1

2021-11-02 Thread Manfred Schwarb via Fortran
Hi, In addition to the patches of Steve Kargl for PR 91497: The MIN1 and MAX1 intrinsics do explicit type conversions and should be silenced too for -Wconversion and -Wconversion-extra. Adjust testcase to only use *4 and *8 real types, provide a second testcase for *10 and *16 precisions. Regtes

Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/91497 -- Silence conversion warnings for MIN1 and MAX1

2021-11-02 Thread Thomas Koenig via Fortran
Hi Manfred, In addition to the patches of Steve Kargl for PR 91497: The MIN1 and MAX1 intrinsics do explicit type conversions and should be silenced too for -Wconversion and -Wconversion-extra. Adjust testcase to only use *4 and *8 real types, provide a second testcase for *10 and *16 precision

Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/91497 -- Silence conversion warnings for MIN1 and MAX1

2021-11-02 Thread Manfred Schwarb via Fortran
Am 02.11.21 um 14:26 schrieb Thomas Koenig: > Hi Manfred, > >> In addition to the patches of Steve Kargl for PR 91497: >> The MIN1 and MAX1 intrinsics do explicit type conversions and should >> be silenced too for -Wconversion and -Wconversion-extra. >> >> Adjust testcase to only use *4 and *8 real

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fortran manual updates

2021-11-02 Thread Sandra Loosemore
On 11/2/21 2:51 AM, Martin Liška wrote: On 11/2/21 00:56, Sandra Loosemore wrote: I'll wait a couple days before committing these patches, in case anybody wants to give some feedback, especially on technical issues. Hello. Appreciate the work you did, but the patchset will cause quite some c

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fortran manual updates

2021-11-02 Thread Martin Liška
On 11/2/21 15:48, Sandra Loosemore wrote: On 11/2/21 2:51 AM, Martin Liška wrote: On 11/2/21 00:56, Sandra Loosemore wrote: I'll wait a couple days before committing these patches, in case anybody wants to give some feedback, especially on technical issues. Hello. Appreciate the work you did

Re: libgfortran.so SONAME and powerpc64le-linux ABI changes (work in progress patches)

2021-11-02 Thread Michael Meissner via Fortran
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 10:56:33AM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote: > Would starting from Advance Toolchain 15 with the most recent glibc make > things easier for Thomas to test? The problem is gcc135 runs Centos 7.x which is not compatible with AT 13-15. -- Michael Meissner, IBM PO Box 98, Ayer, Mas

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fortran manual updates

2021-11-02 Thread Sandra Loosemore
On 11/2/21 9:20 AM, Martin Liška wrote: On 11/2/21 15:48, Sandra Loosemore wrote: On 11/2/21 2:51 AM, Martin Liška wrote: On 11/2/21 00:56, Sandra Loosemore wrote: I'll wait a couple days before committing these patches, in case anybody wants to give some feedback, especially on technical issu

Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/91497 -- Silence conversion warnings for MIN1 and MAX1

2021-11-02 Thread Thomas Koenig via Fortran
On 02.11.21 15:22, Manfred Schwarb wrote: Am 02.11.21 um 14:26 schrieb Thomas Koenig: Hi Manfred, In addition to the patches of Steve Kargl for PR 91497: The MIN1 and MAX1 intrinsics do explicit type conversions and should be silenced too for -Wconversion and -Wconversion-extra. Adjust testca

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fortran manual updates

2021-11-02 Thread Damian Rouson
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 8:56 AM Sandra Loosemore wrote: > > ... I will hold off on that if it's going to cause problems. > > Thanks for taking on this task, Sandra. I'm not aware of the technical issues around mark-up formatting and the transition that's happening, but I hope nothing holds up a l

Re: ping re F2003 and F2008 standards compliance

2021-11-02 Thread Jerry D via Fortran
Paul, great for getting this posted! I would approve but maybe Sandra should. Regardless, thanks for getting this together. Best Regards, Jerry On 11/2/21 1:18 AM, Paul Richard Thomas via Fortran wrote: Hi Sandra, Some weeks ago Andrew Benson triggered me to recover a patch for finalization

Re: ping re F2003 and F2008 standards compliance

2021-11-02 Thread Sandra Loosemore
On 11/2/21 8:11 PM, Jerry D wrote: Paul, great for getting this posted! I would approve but maybe Sandra should. Ummm, I only have approval superpowers for documentation patches, and as a relative newbie to the Fortran front end I would probably struggle to come up with anything useful to say

Bug 103054 - [f18] Gfortran accepts invalid and rejects valid co_reduce argument keyword name

2021-11-02 Thread Damian Rouson
In TS 18508, the second summy argument of co_reduce was named "operator." In the Fortran 2018 standard, the corresponding argument has the name "operation." GFortran accepts the non-standard keyword argument name "operator" and rejects the standard name "operation." % cat co_reduce.f90 implici